Your statement was an incoherent pot kettle comment. I say someone looks like Jester. You... say pot kettle. Thus meaning I look like Jester. I understand english is likely not your first language, but don't blame the misunderstandings on me.

Ok, after a reread, and an hour or two (or three) in Terraria to let my mind digest everything, I do have a few things.

Interesting enough was my view on Taleroth. I noticed a good number of shrewd posts early on before his...well, episode for lack of a better term. I couldn't help but get the feeling that he had an idea of what he was saying. Afterwards it seemed to be a bit of a step back, letting us have the lead in what we were saying. I don't think this looks very good.

Quad's bating of Orryyrro seems, scummy to me still. Yes, he does bring up a good point but the way he does bothers me. It looked like he was trying to make Orryyrro's reason, or lack thereof be a big red light, although there's just as big of one shining right on nmillar dropping the hammer. Hell my reason for voting for Fexen isn't that great all things considering.

Jess bringing up the strawman argument is fairly interesting. I'm curious though as to why she's surprised that Quad has votes on him with that behavior.

I do see more of the argument against Orryyrro now, although right now it's hard to turn that around into a definite vote. I'm just not sure at this point in time.

And nmillar...yeah, I can see the argument there too, and the hammer vote really doesn't look very good either as fast and as 'weak' as the reasoning was. Hard to get a read due to the timing on the vote, but I am suspicious.

As for everyone else, it's kinda touch and go, I don't feel like I have really solid enough reads. I don't know, I just seem to be having trouble putting everything into focus with everything. This really felt like a Day for everyone to not discuss anything but push what they thought from Day 1 without getting any more information.

Well, Quad isn't my biggest scum read...so I'm going to do this then.

[bUnvote. Vote Taleroth

Tossing in a post to let you fix that.

So that brings me to L-2? Time for the fun stuff. I was hoping to wait until day 3, but I may not get that chance.

I'm the town Vigilante. Apparently called a Bandersnatch.

The fun part is that I killed Robbeasy. To avenge Fexen. Which means either the mafia didn't kill anyone or they made the same target I did.

And for some reason Rodzaju recognized this scenario. That the vigilante killed Rob and the mafia did nothing of effect. Only people besides me who should know that are the mafia. I wanted to keep this under my hat and couldn't think of a way to vote against Rod. I wanted to see the third night. I think that maybe, just maybe, there is no mafia. But there's no way to confirm until "tomorrow."

But you've left me no choice.

Unvote nmillar, Vote Rodzaju
Because if there is mafia, then they would know what happened. That there target was already dead, based on the description of the kill. And Rodzaju knows when he has no reason to. He also seemed to be trying to fish out jesskitten as vigilante. I thought if she died tonight from a night kill it would confirm it. But I may not get the chance to entertain that speculation.

Are you frumious?

Also on a more serious note, do you get to nightkill every night, or just a limited number of times throughout the game?

Which answer might help me live through the night?

The honest one. The fact you have to ask is suspicious.

Your asking the initial question doesn't look too upright to me, either.

Interesting. A few pieces fall into place there. I highly doubt that theory of no Mafia is true (that would be exceedingly strange in a game where many of the players are still new).

What is frumious?

Unvote Orryyrro
Vote Rodzaju

Am I allowed to post the details of my role PM? Because I have an answer from my prior behavior, as well.

I refuse to answer because I hold hope of living. If I answer that it's a one-shot deal, then the town and mafia can proclaim they don't trust me, but nothing in lost in continuing the lynch. I die.

If I answer that it is two or more shot, the town will back off and say "oh, we can risk losing the asset" then the mafia night kills me. I die.

I die either way. But I'll gamble on the third option. And it is irrelevant to the information I have already given.

Well, this is just plain piddle right now. If any of this was true, do you really believe that the mafia would slip up so easily? In fact, you appear to have just said that you killed a townie out of pure revenge, without any other reason. Seeing as in the last few games, vigilante-ism has been a one-shot thing, I find it funny that you would waste a shot on something as stupid as this.

And another thing: what the hell, Taleroth? Are you claiming that Mafia are day-talking? Or did they telepathically communicate to each other the vigilante theory? Because, honestly, you really seem to believe that they would have been able to figure out that there was vigilante who targeted Robb, as opposed to the dozen-or-so other killing roles. If I would have had to guess who had thrown out a kill, other than mafia, then I would have assumed "serial killer" if anything at all. I mean, come on, this is wonderland after all. Possibly with a "get the jester" clause, I don't know. In fact, this seems to be a far more reasonable explanation for your nightkill than the one you provided.

"To avenge Fexen". Yeah, right. Good one.

I say that you are scummier than a three week old boiled egg sandwich that was coughed up by a dog into the gutter. Then eaten by a hobo.

My vote stays.

Then either you're mafia or I'll laugh as you lose the game to your own stupidity.

Option 4: You don't answer, you get lynched, you die.

And note that if you are town lying is bad play because it makes what you posted when you were alive less useful to the town since they can't trust it.