Sorry Orryyrro :( Now Ghost:
I liked your posts and felt they were strongly town in D1, but I think your play in D2 has done a total 180, and not for the betterment of town.
GhostQlyph: Jesskitten is odd. There is reasoning and town-friendly behavior, but loads of bandwagoning and "safe" votes. Jesskitten has a lot of experience, as well, and could possibly have caught on to their "styles" between town and mafia, and consciously started avoiding standard mafia play. Another suspect, but bottom of the list.
This strikes me as testing the waters for a potential mislynch. I'm not the only one you call out in #178, you list other suspects too, but your reasons are basically
a)
Too townie logical fallacy, and
b) "Loads" of bandwagoning, which is outright false, since I only voted once outside of RVS, and he was the lynchwagon, and at that time I was pushing his wagon with a scumslip. I note you haven't acknowledged this point since I brought it up in
#181.
GhostQlyph: I hope people will be less quick to jump on my bandwagons as well. Luckily I've been trying to avoid starting them this time.
Funny that from your post analysis, the two people you have voted for in D2 so far up till this point (You voted baz in #189, me in #193, and said this in #198) were people you started a new bandwagon on, based on suspicions you had listed earlier. And you acknowledge his long post but simply glossed over my refutation when I pointed out you were dead wrong. Well here's a long post back for you. ;)
GhostQlyph: On the subject of Orryyrro and Vitek, I notice that this day they are MUCH more vocal. My current "most suspected mafia" full team would consist of Jesskitten (in an advisory role of some sort, helping the newer and less experienced pair to cover their asses), Vitek (probably Roleblocker) and Orryyrro (as the Godfather). They would work together very very well, and the play styles and observations match up with such a thing.
Granted, as I cautioned above -- let's move a bit more slowly this time. We don't need a one-off lynch that ends up all bad.
And again here. How do you know there's even a roleblocker? And I can see the explanation of Orryyrro re: the asking for investigations, but considering the reason he got into hot water in the first place was a random vote on someone, that seems like something rather too complex for the Mafia to orchestrate, especially since Damnation and nmillar were
not Mafia (and had random voted before him). How did the Mafia get them to vote Roosh so Orry could vote him too and get suspicious and then cleared? How did they get Damnation, a now-confirmed townie, to pick him as the "innocent" so that he can get investigated and cleared? That theory fell apart at the seams when Damnation flipped town. So that smells to me more of an earnest attempt to clear his name, though I think his other play still makes him suspicious overall. But to not only know that there are 3 scum, but be able to guess who they are and also what roles they have?
GhostQlyph: If we did, though, I'd pick Jesskitten. Most experienced player and doing some scummy things that are well-hidden behind what appear to be townie posts. If she was Mafia, we'd be cutting off their mastermind. If not... possibly losing a majorly helpful player, but on the other hand I'm seeing a lack of town-friendly behavior except in the realm of bland politeness and scum-tells obscured with murky and often bandwagoned reasoning.
Still, let's be careful this time.
Again, you call bandwagoning as my scummy reason, when I only accused and voted one player on D1 (because it blew up and he claimed scum so quickly) outside reaction fishing on Roosh's vote in RVS, which I explained and you said you were satisfied with. What gives? It seems like you're trying to off your counterpart on town side. And then you slap another dlsclaimer on it that you can point back to later when I flip town.
GhostQlyph: As for not pursuing the Orryyrro thing even though he's scummy:
I lost a metric assload of respect for my mislynch. I still think Orryyrro is a big and easy target for as scummy as he is, but!
<snip>
A: I do not want to damage the credibility of other arguments against him by butting my vote in.
And B: I can help flesh out problems people have with his posts
without leading a torches-and-pitchforks mob in his direction.
And of course, C: others will lynch him just as well as I do if he IS scum, and will be less likely to pull down a mislynch if he ISN'T scum.
This is just playing it safe.
I'm not about to send another townie to the gallows, and lord knows if I get involved and people LISTEN to me, that's got a nice chance of happening. When I get started, I'm not likely to back the hell off.
<snip>
I can't make up my mind about Vitek. First he's Mafia, then he's Town, now he's looking like Mafia again according to the arguments being presented against him.
I'm not going to start a witch-hunt on him because of how things worked with Damnation, but he's looking pretty scummy now.
<snip>
Highly recommended, because I agree: another mislynch would be a horrible idea. Underlines mine. This smells very heavily of two things.
1) You've already started two bandwagons anyway, so it's not that you are afraid of starting witch hunts, but that you are afraid of starting witch hunts on
certain targets. A lot of what you have done in Day 2 is like "I think this person is scum, buuuut.. I don't want to vote him first. I want to see if others agree." or "I can't decide if Vitek's town or not.. he's kinda town, kinda scum", "Typhoon's suspicious but not suspicious enough", etc. You're blatantly fence-sitting and waiting to see where the town comes down on certain targets, using their arguments (ie, baz's on me) to then start a mislynchwagon on them despite your repeated sayings to the contrary.
2) You're playing a very heavy game of
Appeal to Emotion. You keep saying, "Oh, woe be me, I mislynched and now everyone hates me, so I need to be more wishy washy on everything I do." No. If you are town, you have to turn that back around because it makes you look awful. You state that you lost a lot of respect for your mislynch, but who has actually said that in response to your Day 1? No one! Where are you even coming up with this from? It's like you're trying to drag the town in following you anyway but putting up big disclaimers that you may be wrong, on every corner. Of course you may be wrong. I may be. But that's part of Mafia.
GhostQlyph: <snip>
Probably in poor taste to respond to a post sticking up for me with an in-depth analysis, but this is why I take risks like this.
I might get on peoples' nerves, but reactions get put out there and that gives us all a lot more to work with than if we all played safe and quiet.
As I said in the last post before nightfall,
I encourage anyone who suspects me to lynch me, doubly so since I was very very wrong about Damnation. I personally don't think it'll help at all, but if you think the game will work better with me out of the way, then throw those votes in. Not a difference in the world either way, to me.
<snip>
RE: Start of paragraph 2:
Discredited myself in a major way. You'll notice that while aggressive, my day 2 playstyle is more cautious.
I'm fearful of that happening again. Also, it'll take
some time before the rest of the town trusts me enough again for my words to hold weight. So I'm gathering the evidence carefully now, and you've probably noticed I'm quicker to toss suspects now than I was before.
<snip>
No offense taken.
I understand how I must look right now, and your massive post here has sent my suspicions of you to an early grave. I still think it odd you and Vitek believe Damnation looked innocent at the stage of his lynching, but clearly you guys have experience that makes you see something about his posts I didn't. I'm still not buying that most everyone else saw it (even in hindsight) either.
I back up your assessment of those two fully. I'm not willing to continue my harassment of my previous targets, however, for obvious reasons, so I'm going to focus on Jess.
Vote Jesskitten More underlined Appeal to Emotion here, in very heavy doses. You are well within your rights to vote me (even if I don't think you had a reason since you didn't address my refutation at all) and I think you have a great point on the bandwagoning on your Typhoon's suspicions here, but again, I repeat, from all this, what jumps up at me is that either you are scum and trying to subtly influence your town to vote along with you by emotionally feeling sorry for you, and/or doing major fence-sitting so you can easily switch claims and reads later and point back to this, or you are town and really, really feeling bad about Damnation, in which case I have to say with the best of intentions, even if you're going to lynch me for this, but please wake up and stop doing this, because I highly doubt town has discredited you in the least from your D1 play. He brought it onto himself with the scum claim.
Lynch All Liars gets him right there.
But you can't ignore the rest of your suspects on the first day just because some turned up dead and innocent. Are you implying that if you lynch any one of your D2 suspects, or we get nightkilled, then you automatically clear the survivors as town and move on to Day 3 with everyone else? Of course not, some of them flipping town does not at all clear the rest.