Isn't this supposed to be (N <= 9) ?

*sigh* Trent, trent, trent. I'm trying so hard to focus attention away from you.

Yer kiddin' right? Your role claim is proof you're town? Geez, why didn't I figure that out earlier?

HEY EVERYONE. I'M VANILLA TOWN. YOU DON'T HAVE TO LYNCH ME.

Now we just wait to see who doesn't say that, and lynch 'em. Then we cruise to easy victory.

It's not? How do you know? Even if you and Flub are vanilla, are you sure there are more? Why?

...which is why you just brought it up. And explained it. Again.

Once again your reading skills are lacking. I. Did. Not. Bring. It. Up.
Mrkgnao brought it up and I was responding. How you seem to miss this eveytime is baffling.

This is not a role madness game or everyone, yes even flub and me, would have a role. So I am sure this is not a role madness game.

Again with the vanilla claim. I. Did. Not. Bring. It. Up.
I was responding to mrkgnao's question on the matter. You acting the fool again about it is not helping matters.

Their play was way more different. Their roles brought more benefit with earlier claim. Yours doesn't. I doubt it scum will risk hitting another vanilla townie, so if you really are one all that you managed to do with this claim was to put targets on everyone else's backs.

Now that I said this I see another possible play here. Just as with the PGO this could possibly serve as a reason why are you surviving for so long.

I was replying under the assumption that trentonlf was vanilla, as this was the point of the argument.
I did make a mistake though.
It should be N/8, not (N-1)/9.

Got it.

*Sigh*
There is no play here. There is no deception of any sort.

Yes I mentioned my ship model after CSPVG did, and it seems as if that was a mistake.
Yes I claimed vanilla townie after Hijack asked about it at the end of day one. I posted that in 222 because a lot of people were saying my playstyle was similar to game #23 where I was scum. I am not scum this game. And as I said in post 222 there is nothing special about me, I'm just a simple townie.

The only reason this seems to be an issue is everyone keeps bringing it up. I would love to stop explaining this over and over and over and over again.

It may appear as such, but if it comes to voting, I have in mind the suspects that so far look like liabilities. In any case, everyone who so far justified their votes so far hasn't done it very well as far as I'm concerned. Too much speculation, not enough tangible evidence.

That was a joke in correlation to the young girl comment. :P I looked the word before hand on google and knew what the roots were, but I just thought they sounded really funny. Perfect for an anti-sexism joke.

The formula is incorrect. If the odds of getting a power role out of 9 possible target is N/9, then with 1 target claiming townie the formula would become N/(9-1), because only 8 possible targets for a power role remain.

OMG, I can't believe I didn't check the front page today. The hype was real.

Do you think it was necessary for Rob to bus an alleged fellow scum so early?

You mean Lucas Ar.... erm... Disney? Yeah!! Awesome stuff!

I would understand defending myself against someone I suspect as scum, or someone I suspect as town with compelling evidence in spite of them being wrong, but not against someone who I'm fairly certain is town, but also just a bad player. He did no questioning. He has no evidence. He just came up with this "marvelous" theory and expects everyone to take it as evidence. Fun stuff.
I'm sure that's how scum are caught. /endsarcasm
As for readings, no one got anything substantial so far. I'll make an effort and come with something more conclusive, but right now I am still just paying attention to the flow. I act once an opportunity arises.

Coming from someone who has been accused by an interesting number of people of posting novellas without saying anything, this is humorously ironic.
Also, building cases? Shouldn't you pay attention to everyone?

You should have seen me game #23.
Also, please don't put words into my mouth or I'll pull a trent on you. Never said adalia's role claim is true. I said I believe it. There's a difference, especially when you don't know the truth.

Again, who said anything about a threat to CSPVG? I said a risky play. nothing about any threat or me putting him on my scum list. A risky play. Now I will indeed pull a trent on you and recommend reading comprehension lessons.

Care to make a bet?

Here's where your lack of skills as a whole come. You theorize and only do that. Nothing else. Evidence can be seen through posting. Whether it is someone catching someone else with a slip, doing an interrogation or reading scummy posts.
As far as any of these go, you do a lot of talking, but prove nothing and come up with nothing.
I'll keep my stand and say you're town, but also a bad player.

You also conveniently for a second time omit to say that in the same post where I said I believe adalia's claim, I was IN FAVOR of his lynch. Second time you omit this.

And once again you disregard actual evidence of posts for your implausible theories.

You did this with trent, and now you're doing it with me.

Need I say more what type of player I think you are?