trentonlf: I would like to hear from others on adaliabooks before we hammer anything.
I believe the main thing that drew our attention to adaliabooks is the relative weakness of some of his arguments and the ease with which he was willing to retract them when confronted. This has been commented upon by quite a few going back at least 5 real-time days now.
I find most of the other points made against him (e.g. the four scum, the train incident) of little relevance in hindsight, execpt in that they might have rattled him. In truth, I must admit I still don't really understand the train incident that well. It seems, according to Krypsyn (#469), that Vitek had made some "point/joke" (if he did I missed it). I also still don't understand what Robbeasy (#142) meant by "Can you see why I'm doing this?" (doing what? and indeed why?). But I guess I can live with my ignorance.
Unlike HijacK, I understand why adaliabooks used the word "misinterpret". I believe what he's saying is "Yes. I've made some questionable posts along the line, but I'm still town, and you are misinterpreting weak arguments as an indication of my being scum". That by itself, while possibly true, does not, however, balance for me the sum of his past posts. This argument could just as easily be that of a scum trying to save his hide as a townie trying to dissuade us from making a mistake.