Robbeasy: Krypsyns behaviour doesn't actually strike me as that odd to be honest - and some of his earlier posts were well thought out and had some good points in. At this point I wouldn't be willing to shift my vote, but as deadline gets closer I would do anything other than no-lynch, of course. I still think CSPVG is an excellent candidate for lynch!
I agree with you that his readings were well thought-out and very characteristic of him. However, shifting his vote back and forth between Darko and Vitek is not something I associate with him (but I played only one game with him). It's more something I would expect from you. I was thinking that this was some kind of trap he was trying, like when he voted CSPVG on day #1 without mentioning any reason (#238 + #298). I had previously disrupted his "trap" by asking about it (#274 + #278). I don't know whether I'm doing it again, but since it's been already three days since it began, I allow myself to mention it.
Robbeasy: @mrkgnao - so basically you are hanging your whole theory on me 'bussing' adalia on the one phrase 'Can you see why I'm doing this?'
Yes. I freely admit that the cases against all three of my suspected scum are not particulry strong (which is why all three are "tend to scum", not "strong scum"). But if I look around I don't see anyone making a significantly stronger case, which is why our combined scum list has eleven names on it. I certainly think that your case against CSPVG is weaker (Vitek's case is somewhat more substantial).
This dependence on one sentence or even one word has been my method all along. It worked twice (popperik and trenton+budejovice) and failed once (HijacK+JMich). Time shall tell whether I'm 3-for-1 or 2-for-2.
BTW, I'm not the only one using this method. I remember a game ages ago (perhaps Vitek could dig it up) where someone has made a "case" against another based on an "I'm train" joke.
Robbeasy: no matter its first day and illogical to buss someone who had no other pressure on them.
I already mentioned that I now think that your first vote was a distancing attempt gone wrong. When you placed your second vote, adaliabooks was anything but with "no other pressure on them".
Robbeasy: no matter that I'm bussing the strongest role Mafia is likely to get.
I already mentioned that I subscribe to Vitek's analysis that, based on Telika's previous game, it's likely that the scum did not know adalia's role during day #1.
Robbeasy: no matter that I didn't waver all day.
Except that you did. You removed your first vote on him.
Robbeasy: no matter that I explained the phrase - I was trying to provoke further response from Adalia. Let me be clear - I knew my PM had me piloting a spaceship called 'Robbeasy'. Vitek said 'I am spaceship', which matched my PM, but adalia immediately came out with 'I am Train'. This rang alarm bells because it looked to me like adalia might have had a different sort of PM. The 'Can you see why I'm doing this' was a further prod at him - i was after a response confirming or expressing further puzzlement at Viteks 'I am spaceship'.
I didn't really expect you to say "Wow! mrkgnao is right! I am scum!". I don't seem to remember anyone in any game that was unable to explain his behaviour, yet some were scum (and some were town).
Robbeasy: But meh - I've explained it enough, you either believe it or not.
I'm like a nail. The more
you hammer on me, the more embedded I become, for better or worse.
I do hope you're scum. I hate to have wasted all this electronic ink on a townie.
Red herring of the day: Flubbucket has a new avatar with #672 on it.
Wouldn't it be nice if he had one with the number of a future post then we'll see who lands on it.
