The one truly scummy thing I've seen from Vitek is his post where he says he would be OK with lynching Krypsyn for inactivity and other reasons. I found it to be extremely out of character and I would probably vote him for it,
But then I see Krypsyn's reads, where he has me as top scum along with Vitek and I begin doubting myself. I know he has a history of suspecting me, but it's getting ridiculous the 3rd time around. In our previous game, he probably suspected me even after I got NKed, while he was chilling in the Cop quicktopic with a scum.
Krypsyn: Vitek (Scum):
I seems like his posts during Day 2 have be more interested finding things wrong with other people's posts, rather that being pro-active with anaysis. He seems to try to find minor problems with other people's posts, then make these mole hills into mountains. I see this as more disruptive and obfuscating than as actual scum-hunting.
My prime example of this is perhaps a little OMGUS. When I was replying to trentonlf, and I only quoted part of his post in my reply, trentonlf questioned me about it. I didn't think it was a big deal, but it was a decent enough follow up by trentonlf. However, Vitek jumped on, also putting pressure on my for “omitting” details to make trentonf look guilty. The way he followed up someone to attack me (for what I believe is a weak reason) is highly suspect.
Lastly, when he has made potentially pro-town posts, such as his reads post in 941, they have seem very weak, with little bite. He essentially says he doesn't think anyone has done anything to seem that scummy. Super.
This along with how he fence-sat regarding the adaliabooks lynch, and never voted makes him one of my top two scum candidates.
Vitek's participation is always minimal and limited to sarcastic remarks/trying to kill conversations he deems anti-town, up to the point when he focuses on a player for a minor thing and they fight for the rest of the game (or until one of them dies). Has your experience with Vitek been so different from mine?
I'd be interested in you showing me a game where Vitek was active in bandwagons though, especially on Day 1.
Krypsyn: One of my major complaints about DarkoD13 is that he was always nitpicking others, but never coming out with something positive. I even noted his stance on trentonlf (but not yogsloth) in my notes, but I missed it while compiling my reads post. By no means does this exonerate him, but he no longer is at the bottom of my list; Vitek is now (hence he gets my vote).
Well, you know, it's not like I've done a reads post recently, it was easy to miss. trentonlf: @Krypsyn. Where has Darko attempted to twist what others have said? I can't seem to find anywhere he does and you left no links to posts that show it.
Krypsyn: Posts 641 and 659 are good examples of this.
Right now, the voting pool for me is Vitek, Krypsyn, Sage103082. Sage's notes post was an interesting touch though, I'll have to go through her posts again before making up my mind.
I wouldn't vote for CSPVG at the moment for reasons I've mentioned before (I've also seen them mentioned by Vitek somewhere).