Hey don't quote my posts before I've re-read them for the 138th time.

OK, this part actually made me mad. No.
I went through every page looking for every single vote relating to adalia, adding the reason for the vote/unvote next to it. When in doubt, I copy/pasted the exact words so no one would be misrepresented and so we could have an easy-to-read and objective reference. Then I went through every single page 2 more times.
There is nothing "a bit" about this and I don't like the comparison:
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_24_the_not_ending_soon_war/post651

I still think it somewhat misrepresented the adalia/CSPVG "relationship", but I accepted mrkgnao's interpretaion of it as valid. I actually like how he plays so far, despite of alignment.

Nevermind, I won't go there.

Bah, don't play the damn game when you are unable to defeat stupid Burnley.

I am not willing to dig into that.
It's hard to judge why he posted. Could just find some spare time knowing he is wanted and I am not able to tell if there was sinister intent behind it.

It sure suggests that. It itself is meant to suggest he has something to claim and to be left alone but often it is counterproductive as it just makes people push that person to claim range.
CSPVG is known to claim recklessly so it is bit out of characters but on the other hand he does it on his own terms, not when pressured for it.
I am not really one to judge it again, as I already think he is mafia so my view is skewed and I am usualy stubborn to claim myself. Or maybe I just burnt out my brain cells' power fuel for today. :-)

You mean my usual posting, right? :-)
I am not here to praise people but I can compliment your tie if you wish.


So you don't agree with them. :-(

My Pokemon eat question mark from my last post. I got him neutered in return.
"Gotta spay them all!"

Sorry to interrupt but I voted CSPVG about 1 hour ago.
(I also found mistake in one of yours D1 votecounts today. I am sorry. I hope you are not mad at me, almighty mod)

I never said it wasn't accurate, I merely said it added nothing new. Just like Sage's cut/pastes of adaliabooks' posts.

Oh, please do. I always do love a good rehash of the obvious. You are pretty good at it. :)

I basically read this as you calling a post that took me an hour to write useless. Thanks.

And thanks.

These things wouldn't happen if you didn't ask for votecounts when i sleep. Seriously. Do i ring your votecount alarm middle in the night ?

Even more seriously, i am half asleep. If i try to correct anything right now i will make it much much worse. Will look into it tomorrow, after my (first) eleven hours of sleep.

(Also i hope it wasn't someone else who got lynched on day one. That would be embarrassing.)

I think Telika was lynched day one, I could be wrong though :-)

yog- post 1060 -- what really????? not a good post at all.

Hijakc bring up possible power role bc of ships-- scummy thing to do

yog vs hijack - is this really getting us anywhere??

Rob- thinks Mrk and CSPLVG might be togather in out to get him.

Well at least my vote for yog got something going and people talking.

dedo questions about my list from 3 days ago why wait so long

Yogs states that his game play has not been very good recently. (To me I see this as a bit of scum worrying about how others are going to interpret his posts and trying to get others to think nothing of it.. )

Rob- states he is the only one applying pressure

hmmm.. books played scummy and flipped scum yet hijack is pointing out all the scummy things yogs is doing but nah he cant be scum

Krypsyn - goes over bandwagon on books in good detail (+)

yogs and tent going back and forth over roles.. sigh

Yogs - love the use of we and not scum....

Hiajcks - To me it seems a lot of text with no real information. he is not pointing out that anyone is scum or really leaning scum. It is like he is neutral on everyone. No questions to anyone either. Seems like a - hey look a big post from me... im not scum

not sure I am understanding this whole Kryspn vs. Sage style posts. --
does this mean I am being put under the scope bc someone hit their head and likes my play style...FYI i have no play style yet. being my game 3 I am still learning.. not trying to play like others and be the loudest voice

yogs- posts a wall of text with no real substance.

Ypgs- He calls my play style out for game 1 - My first ever game -

game 2 - he thought I was scum the whole time - so my play style sucked

game 3 (this one) He calls out my staying on the side lines and now just posting better.....well if we wanna go that route your game play is backwards... scum tend to sink and town tend to get their footing as scum post more and more nonsense.

Darko - why only ask me to explain some of my reads and not all?

trent- seems so much about his role and night action. Feel like all his posts are about it.

(re-Read over day 2)

DarKo is very quick to point to who he thinks is town (trent and yogs)

Vitek is the next post to chine in and agree yogs is town

mrkgnao points out he is not keen on Viteks post - tendency to attempt to dissuade the town from exploring specific avenues of investigation. (Yet Vitek does not go after him as he does later to dedo. Vitek seems to very easily go after someone if they bring him up but not here. why?)

Rob talks about getting back to books posts -- (he uses "their" previous posts (why not say his posts) goes on to say he is ok with trents night claim

Krypsyn returns from the game world to start posting again.
Krypsen states we should go back to books and flub -admits he had concerns flub might have power role and played different (hmm)

yogs wants to talk about 4 scum and why it might be possible (should be worrying about finding scum not how many?)

Yogs calls out Hijack for his reason for not voting for books. ( Good post)

Dedo and Dark seem to be tiffing a bit nothing major

Rob out of the blue pops on, says I have not really read books posts again but yeah its been getting quiet on the Trent train so VOTE because of how he got off the wagon at some point. (not reading the thread is not a town thing to do)

Dedo mentions to Darko he thinks vitek is scum
next post we hear from vitek again after a while of quiet from him. Vitek gets very defensive and a bit snippy

Hijack and yogs banter a bit

Darko kinda backs dedo when it comes to vitek being behavior and not adding to the thread

Rob unvotes trent and goes over bandwagon and gives a half can be scum half can be town.. not every much real info added to the game

CSPVG posts! Long time not talkie! Brings up Rob for his last posts in day 1 being scummy. ( are we waiting for rob to post so we could go after him or just give him a good opportunity to point out scummy actions? )

Rob vote Vitek because he did not vote for books

GGGGRRR WHY ARE WE STILL TALKING ABOUT THE NUMBER OF MAFIA! THIS GETS US NO WHERE!

POST - 715 Vitek -@ mostly mrkgnao - (basically tries to null everything MrK has posted. and says everything maybe looked at as one way or the other and nulls the whole posts. - I find this a bit scummy) That's also why we should require list of reads form player who is about to get lynched. So we would know his opinion on every player (this can be good for town and bad for town as well. It would give mafia a way to go on the next day depending on who the persons reads are)

yog -- (well since Rob voted Vitek let me jump on this train and see where it goes! )

Dedo and Vitek still fighting with each other

yog decided to push Hijack again

Krypsen likes my post style and thougts.... HE MUST HAVE HIT HIS HEAD OR HAD A STROKE -- MIGHT NEED HELP
-
Vitek claims an inatament object?

I have to give a +1 to yogs for calling out Hijack

Darko - posts a list of the wagon but leaves of his I will vote in the monring. (not sure this means anything)

yogsloth post 116 brings up flubs avatar after the everyone stopped talking about it. (why?)

Thanks, Sage!

A couple points:

Really? I must have missed this. What post(s)?

I've been accused of worse.

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_24_the_not_ending_soon_war/post595

and if it doesn't clicky cause I can never get it to its post #595 (7 posts after coming back from night)

Maybe it is just late and I am exhausted, but can you explain why?

Is there a chronological order to your notes?
As for a couple that concern me,

Because I don't consider "straddling the fence" as an actual read. It can be anything from "equally scummy/townish" to "I don't know". "Leaning to scum or town", however, are actual reads and can't be posted without justification.


Because proclaiming an intention of voting (sincere or insincere) is not the same thing as voting.

They are kinda over the place because when I do re-reads and see something ill just add it. Since there is some interest in my notes I will try to make sure to keep them better organized. Also these are just my notes and things I want to remember or that I find off. or interesting There are things on there that have already been answered or my opinions have changed because of answers or posts about that note.