It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Just what do you think you're doing, Daves?
Gambit might have worked if hadn't got snowed under with other stuff. Though was a risky play from the beginning.

You'll find out soon enough anyway

I am, GABRIEL DELANEY, town lyncher

Good luck finding the mafia.
avatar
pazzer: Gambit might have worked if hadn't got snowed under with other stuff. Though was a risky play from the beginning.

You'll find out soon enough anyway

I am, GABRIEL DELANEY, town lyncher

Good luck finding the mafia.
In what way does this relate to your claim of a day role?
avatar
nmillar: In what way does this relate to your claim of a day role?
He wanted to flub lynched, I guess so he faked positive result.

The mafiascum.net wiki actually advises this.

Hm, and it kinda checks with Quadr's previous mention found by Telika.

Oh, blimey.
avatar
pazzer: Gambit might have worked if hadn't got snowed under with other stuff. Though was a risky play from the beginning.

You'll find out soon enough anyway

I am, GABRIEL DELANEY, town lyncher

Good luck finding the mafia.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Lyncher ?
avatar
pazzer: Gambit might have worked if hadn't got snowed under with other stuff. Though was a risky play from the beginning.

You'll find out soon enough anyway

I am, GABRIEL DELANEY, town lyncher

Good luck finding the mafia.
What is, exactly, your win condition ?
avatar
nmillar: In what way does this relate to your claim of a day role?
That was the gambit to try and get flub lynched. So most likely he's town.

unvote

win condition is all mafia dead and on wagon when flub lynched
Awesome. Totally not lost time at all.

Co-cop CSPVG thing "solved" (that is, true or not, CSPVG's claim is more credible now).

Town win plus flub lynch would be more compatible if flub mafia, but it would give a weird headstart to town to have one of its member being pushed to go after flub right from the start. So yeah, flub probably town.

Back to square one, right before dawn ? Fantastic. Means what, NMillar or me ?

Unvote. Vote NMillar. I believe absolutely not in the honesty of any of his asrguments against me so far, plus I had already too many reasons to vote for him before that. Vote me, people, if you prefer. But then, keep in mind throughout the next days that I was quite certain of NMillar's guilt, even though I had no straightforward element of the sort that Pazzer claimed to have.
But the problem is it doesn't have to be nmillar or you, you can be both town. It's fake dichotomy.

Can't we jsut lynch Red_baron like good people?
avatar
Vitek: But the problem is it doesn't have to be nmillar or you, you can be both town. It's fake dichotomy.

Can't we jsut lynch Red_baron like good people?
It doesn't even have to have anything to do with me. I was making my case against him even way before his "i jailed him therefore he is scum because there is only 1/154 chances for a doctor to shield a target while there is 365409076/3 chances for a roloblocker to block a killer" case.

Or nonvoting people can also decide that L-1 Pazzer lies about being town lyncher, and is actually mafia lyncher, or thus go "fuck that, let's have a jail for jail's sake", but I don't see any specific reason to suspect Pazzer in particular at this point. He's back to 50/50 chances as far as I'm concerned.

A few hours ago, I've PM-ed Joe about the hour of the day's end, but I've got no answer from him yet.
avatar
Vitek: But the problem is it doesn't have to be nmillar or you, you can be both town. It's fake dichotomy.

Can't we jsut lynch Red_baron like good people?
hear hear!
(Edit of my last post :

a) "lynch-for-lynch's sake", not "jail-for-jail's sake"

b) pazzer at L-2 since he removed his own self-vote)
Hmm, if pazzer is indeed telling the truth, then it seems highly likely that there'd be one or two mafia that jumped on the lynch wagon. He was at L-1 for a good 3 hours before appearing and making his claim too, so there was plenty of opportunity for mafia to push through the lynch.

I suspect at least 2 (if not all 3) of the mafia were on this wagon:

flubbucket, SirPrimalform Robbeasy and amok, CSPVG, P1na and pazzer himself all cast votes. Telika was also prepare to cast a vote until he realised pazzer was already at L-1.
avatar
nmillar: Hmm, if pazzer is indeed telling the truth, then it seems highly likely that there'd be one or two mafia that jumped on the lynch wagon. He was at L-1 for a good 3 hours before appearing and making his claim too, so there was plenty of opportunity for mafia to push through the lynch.

I suspect at least 2 (if not all 3) of the mafia were on this wagon:

flubbucket, SirPrimalform Robbeasy and amok, CSPVG, P1na and pazzer himself all cast votes. Telika was also prepare to cast a vote until he realised pazzer was already at L-1.
and what if pazzer is scum? can it not mean that those who did not hammer, even thought they had the chance, can be scum and did not want to hammer a scum buddy?
I pass by to check how things are doing, and we suddenly have a full turnaround? Unvotes right when we were 1 vote away from a lynch, when Joe could show up anytime and end the day with a nolynch? Are people seriously thinking that we every single player is going to have the time to come in, read, think about it, and agree on a new lynch victim today?

I will do my best to check on this again a bit later, but for now, my vote stays where it is.