Allow me to quote you
I'm not sure where you mention the one-shot though. You say you investigated flub, then you say you have a day cop ability.

Oh well, I'll sleep on it and see who I vote for.

[i]Couldn't edit. Typed wrong number when trying to link the quote to the right post (357 instead of 347). So, disregard the previous one, it's supposed to look like this instead.
[/i]
--------------------

So question :

How is "one-shot cop" a "traditionally third-party" role ?

Hmmm, interesting find, Telika.

Hmm, that's interesting. I'm bad at remembering that replacements are the same person as the person they replaced. This is pretty significant...

I had completely forgotten that it was QuadAlien before Pazzer. :S

Hmm well I was a one shit vig, in an earlier game, so I guess one-shot cop ain't totally far off.

However usual third-party roles is considered to be:
Arsonist
Cult
Cult Leader
Cultafia
Cultist
Inquisitor
Jester
Lyncher
Mentor
Mime
Reporter
Serial Killer
Survivor
Unlyncher

So gaddamnit, this is terrible. So flubbucket is still my primary suspect, but following this the logic would be to lynch pazzer, heck he even voted for himself. However that can also be taken as a good sign (Unless he is doing a Damnation), then if he is actually truthful then flubbucket is scum and should be lynched - but might be able to avoid it if Pazzer is indeed third-party.

So perhaps would should decide already know that if Pazzer is one-shot cop, and third-party, we should still lynch flubbucket as the next one. Then we can get those of us currently voting for flubbucket to change and hope that Pazzer is truthful.

But the darn problem is that if he is third-party he might not have a town agenda, as such we don't actually know if flubbucket is town or not even if we go through with the lynch and Pazzer is not a one-shot cop. This is freaking annoying, but heck if that situation occurs I'll be voting for amok.

pazzer voted for me and then voted himself without an unvote...<---------------------

irrelevant post regarding voting.

I may believe his point regarding being busy, and I will admit to having fun with the false accusation banter. However, in order to get a proper lynch and follow-up information you all much consider your options carefully.

Why are some players still weighing options? Why are some voting non-starters? Which lynch will garner the most information? Are either of the two (flubbucket/pazzer) scum at all??


And most important of all, how do I get Firefox to copy/cut/paste?!?!?

Ctrl+C, ctrl+x, ctrl+v?

Ok, here we are. I still very much think we should lynch pazzer, even more since Telika's find last night. In the interest of avoiding a no lynch I would be willing to change my vote to flub but I honestly think paz is more likely to be our scum.

Personally, I'll finally do a semi-serious vote. I'll unvote flub and vote pazzer, if only because he's voting for himself. I he wants to die, is unlikely to keep up the job and might get modkilled, I'd say we better lynch him now.

hmm.... I will be staying on my vote on pazzer.

In light of it at seeming to be at best a one-shoot day cop, and he now have used is ability, it means that he no longer have a power role. That consideration is gone, and from now on he is 'vanilla'. That is not even considering lies and deceits.

Yes, lying is just inexcusable. I'm sure there's someone else who has lied a lot in this game...

hehe, not what I meant.

I think lying has a purpose, but I was thinking not considering he is not lying about his role, i.e. he do may have a power role at all. But now it seems that the best possible outcomes is that he had a one-shoot ability, which now is used.

In the interest of actually reaching a lynch by today, Unvote flubbucket and Vote Pazzer.

I believe he is now one vote away from a lynch, correct?

Nope. Joe hasn't specified, he didn't specify on day 1 either from what I remember.