It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Telika: I mean, can this be interpreted as no result ? Doesn't the "a" prevent this interpretation?
Yeah, I got that about half a second after hitting post. Glad I didn't have to wait 10 minutes to correct that.

Still, it hardly matters as I was joking. I don't really think there's such a thing as a day block, and I'm not even sure I believe pazzer's claim.
avatar
pazzer: ......................<snip>......................

Am voting for flub as most of his posts have been meaningless with no effort made to find mafia. Plus got a no town result when investigated him.

Was most disappointed not to have a day kill but day cop ability was quite fun too.

..................<snip>..................
You are either lying or an insane cop. Either way your investigation is wrong. I also find it odd in light of CSPVG's claim and caveat.

I am willing to be lynched to show myself town if it will then lead to the lynch of pazzer to show him scum. Now where have I heard this before.....

I do not trust the "day cop" claim especially in light of the calls by so many to stop claiming. I was a proponent early on of getting the Day One information out and my play has been quite town. I invite any scrutiny.
avatar
Vitek: But pazzer has history of claiming day ability before so I would wait with accepting his claim.
Was he town or mafia during those instances?
avatar
JoeSapphire: and JMich flubbucket were conspicuous in that they had voted for nobody at all!
Does this mean JMich and Flub is really one person :)

Good name, by the way.
avatar
flubbucket: I am willing to be lynched to show myself town if it will then lead to the lynch of pazzer to show him scum.
I assume Pazzer is totally okay with that ?
Oh fuck, we have the Telika and nmillar situation and now we have a similar situation between paz and Flub. paz says flub is 'not town' and flub says he's lying... So unless paz is insane then one of them is lying and therefore scum.

Great, so we have two "one or the other" situations and one admitted liar. No shortage of lynch targets but none of them really definite safe lynches. Probably 1 or 2 amongst the 5 though. My guesses are nmillar and flub.

Reasoning for flub is that I can't see a motivation for paz lying out of the blue like that, if he's scum that lie wouldn't pay off in the long run because it would get him lynched.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Oh fuck, we have the Telika and nmillar situation and now we have a similar situation between paz and Flub. paz says flub is 'not town' and flub says he's lying... So unless paz is insane then one of them is lying and therefore scum.
You've posted several times since pazzer made the comment about flubbucket, so why have you waited until now to actually comment about it?
avatar
nmillar: You've posted several times since pazzer made the comment about flubbucket, so why have you waited until now to actually comment about it?
I assume he commented now because flubbucket just commented to pazzer, thus making this a comment to the situation that have now occurred after flubbucket posted. And SPF had not commented after flubbucket made his post, until this. So it makes perfect sense.

As for flubbucket suggestion to lynch him, and then pazzer if flubbucket is town - I am totally okay with that :)
avatar
Red_Baron: As for flubbucket suggestion to lynch him, and then pazzer if flubbucket is town - I am totally okay with that :)
I'd do it the other way round - a day role is very unusual, so pazzer's claim is most likely false. This also means I need to drop Red_Baron or Robbeasy from my scum list, but not sure which one.
avatar
Red_Baron: As for flubbucket suggestion to lynch him, and then pazzer if flubbucket is town - I am totally okay with that :)
avatar
nmillar: I'd do it the other way round - a day role is very unusual, so pazzer's claim is most likely false. This also means I need to drop Red_Baron or Robbeasy from my scum list, but not sure which one.
wel... then I do have door #2 for you:

Red+Rob+Pazzer....
avatar
nmillar: I'd do it the other way round - a day role is very unusual, so pazzer's claim is most likely false. This also means I need to drop Red_Baron or Robbeasy from my scum list, but not sure which one.
Hehe, I agree - highly unusual. But since I am already suspect of flubbucket I would be more inclined to vote for him first - as I am currently thinking along the lines of if pazzer is scum, then he and flubbucket must have something going on between them (given my belief that flubbucket is scum). However flubbucket has (thank god) not randomly claimed a power-role yet, so given the choice of lynching a claimed unusual power-role, but a power-role or lynching the one I already suspect to be scum, I favored the latter. And in that regard I also favor it above the Telika/nmilla situation - where I don't really have that strong suspicion for either.


@amok so now you decided to place pazzer in favor of Telika, I see. And it has nothing at all to do with two of those being interested in voting for you? Oh and have you by now actually made an actual case against any one of those? :D
avatar
Red_Baron: @amok so now you decided to place pazzer in favor of Telika, I see. And it has nothing at all to do with two of those being interested in voting for you? Oh and have you by now actually made an actual case against any one of those? :D
That's not exactly news :)

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post729

But don't worry - you still have the top spot.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Oh fuck, we have the Telika and nmillar situation and now we have a similar situation between paz and Flub.
Yup. I'm in a good position to understand Flub's reflex and I'll just point out that, when I suggested it, mister Definitely-Convinced hasn't been very "yeah okay let's do that then".

So, right now, I'm waiting for mister Fire-And-Forget's answer to Flub.
avatar
nmillar: You've posted several times since pazzer made the comment about flubbucket, so why have you waited until now to actually comment about it?
This was my first post since flub responded and said he'd be ok with being lynched. I had commented on the paz and flub situation, but until Flub's post it wasn't as similar as the situation between you and Telika. You know what? RB explained this better than I can be bothered to, his post says what I want to.

I do kind of wonder what the point of your post here was though.
Oh fuck me, you guys really stepped in it while I was busy doing house demolition huh? And sadly, real life basically had me running around my house for the past few days looking for drains.

I'm not going to step into things too deeply, mainly because catching up after a few days and a lot of posts feels like a rather daunting task even during the best.

I'm pushing the pazzer/flub situation a bit to the side. It does seem like pazzer has almost inadvertantly claimed some sort of cop role, but I'd like him to clear that up before we look at it too deeply. Mainly because of the other incident...

nmillar/Telika/CSPVG (Seriously you think I wouldn't have to keep forgetting what letters go where here!)....I'm oddly in favor of a Telika lynch here...Jailer roleblocks and protects their target, and with a lack of a lynch it honestly does feel like there's something there.

EXCEPT, CSPVG's claim really bugs me a bit. Since he clued us in about the locked door, I'm trying to figure out what that means. His claim seems to be for investigation but he doesn't really talk about his results in any definitive state. Possible killer who simply got blocked by the protection? As bumbling as he seems to claim? Ugh, seriously this one got walked into but good, my head's spinning even more then it was a few minutes ago.