Oh boy, I can't wait until Pazzer gets up to post 530. It'll be like seeing someone watching The Sixth Sense for the first time.

This list
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post110
+this earlier one
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post37
looked to me like a majority. I won't go into details as to why I considered some things more dangerous than others (because of Joe's threats), but you can check an earlier post where I explain. Not sure what qualifies as misinformation in your book and you probably missed the "consensus" part.
And yeah, hammering anyone before they have a chance to defend themselves is incredibly stupid and can deprive the town of valuable info. Plus I was curious as to how Zchinque was going to handle himself when a player got close to getting lynched.

A new day, but no new posts yet? For shame, gentle souls.

Fair enough to those that say discussing last night's lack of a kill would not be a good idea. I can see how it would be detrimental to town, thinking of it now.

Also, while we're all seemingly clambering onto the vague claim train, I had to pick a number last night, too. I picked 3, and nothing at all happened. Exciting.

P1na: Don't you dare go serious about this game on me. Don't you dare.

Unfortunately, I've not much else to add. I'm still considering where to place my vote. Amok does seem like the likeliest candidate, but I can't escape the feeling that he's a jester. Does anyone else think Telika's case against nmillar holds up?

Oh, don't worry. You know I wouldn't do that.

No, but since Robbeasy, SirPrimalForm and Telika are our scum team, I can understand why he fabricated the case.

Did he say anything about me? Because if he's badmouthing me, I'll PM him a punch.

Some of it: http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post646

Interesting that nmillar has since declared me and Telika scum (did that come out of nowhere or has he said this before?). I'm surprised such an experienced player would be so OMGUS-y.

It is nmillars way - I've seen him declare the scum team before in just such a manner.

Come on then nmillar - give us your reasoning please?

Does he normally do it on the basis of who suspects him?

Ah i see - i also see how difficult it now is to defend myself as we can't mention it.

I see... can you link to an earlier time when you did talk about it or link to someone else making the same observation?

Can I play ball and ask for a link countering the repeated observation that can be read, but no longer commented, so we can have the other side of the argument as well? Things are bound to turn fun if we through links at each other about old posts without actually being allowed to talk about them, I really want to see that.

Is quoting old posts about that which can no longer be mentioned, mentioning that very same thing? The line is thin. I'm thinking of making a post full of quotes from day 1, that when read straight becomes a mention of the unmentionable, only it wouldn't really be me mentioning it. But I won't do so, partially because I would risk my life by pushing the boundaries of the ruleset (even an awesome hero such as I can be modkilled), but mostly due to laziness.

I enjoy these very limited summations, either they are a good way for us to get your thoughts or/and a good way to influence our thoughts :P Anyway allow me a few comments/corrections:

First off I find it interesting that you note the most suspect things in regards to amok, yet use the most negative words in regards to me who was/is gunning for amok.

Anyway:
p218: You missed the point which so far I have actually only seen Telika get, the chance of him being town was lower then the rest, thus he made a better target for day one. So no, not an attempt to avoid blame, but to avoid lynching town. Amazing how hard that is to understand for people.

p286: If you were actually summarizing correctly, you should have noted that I said I could believe the claim was made by joe, not that I actually did believe it. You should also note that a lot of others did say they believed it, without the clarifying statement..

p312: Again, if you were to actually write the facts; I stated I weren't scum hunting, I was hunting targets least likely to be town based upon mod info and their own claims. Heck of a lot better then pure guessing. But I guess, attempting to actually use day One for something useful is rubbish ;)

p317: Voting for someone in an RVS stage is not "having gone for JMich". But yes, I did vote for him, however to me there is a big difference of voting for someone, and going for someone. The latter entails a more dedicated effort to get that person lynched, like say my attempts to get amok lynched. In case you want to see the so called: Gone for JMich attempt:

Yea, that is clearly a very serious vote that should be used to claim that I am switching targets all the time and act oddly by rejecting to have gone for JMich. I find it interesting that some used this to say I was vote jumping and found enough reason to consider it scummy based upon an RVS vote combined with my actual case. So me having one actual case was very suspect. Yea, I am taking a closer look at those people ;)

Looking forward to your final conclusion, though I would advice a less suspect approach (or more careful read, even if I love having your thoughts for each day, the posts I commented on should have given you the info at the time they were, thus also now) if I am to keep my town image of you ;)

For the record the following people claimed I was vote jumping:
- DarkoD13 -> Voted in the amok lynch, not really sure what else about him.

- CSPVG -> Voted me, then changed vote to amok before deadline. Was very interested in seeing me lynched - he is on my don't know, but I guess more likely to be scum list - Not due to his beef against me but because of the arguments, such as "gut feeling" which is darn hard to argue with and asking others as to how much they suspect me.

- amok -> I believe he just went with it in an attempt to avoid a lynch by lynching me? or something - given his whole act on day one it is hard to say.

But yea, amok was a single vote away from lynch and multiple people posted before and could thus easily have voted, however failed to do so, which I find somewhat interesting as well.

PS: For the record I am only quoting, not discussing those that should not be named - which I assume is okay.

Not sure who you're referring to, but, personally, it's your voting for 2 different people (amok, Zchinque) between January 8th to January 10th that I found weird, not your RVS or JMich vote.