Geez, the reason for SPF's vote against amok is bad but Red_Baron's is just horrible.
Voting someone for being different? Yeah, great reason. You don't even suggest he is scum, you only want to start bandwagon against him?
That's awful.

There is only one reason why I am not going to vote you right now (can you guess why?) but you absolutely deserve to be lynched.
Much better lynch than someone who should be lynched to provide information for being "different".

amok: Unfortunately 'fresh ski tracks every morning' is all my PM offers. Which is why I added the bit about me not knowing how this helped bit at the end of my last message.

Red_Baron: Are you suggesting that we hunt neutrals on day one, simply to get 'accurate information'? This seems odd to me. It's not that I don't think amok's half-claim merits exploring, but rather that I feel the objective of any day is to hunt scum.

It is true that, for the most part, a townie is lynched on the first day, but do we not get accurate information as well? Doesn't a lynch usually give us information to work with, regardless of the person lynched or the people doing the lynching?

P1na: That sounds like a plan indeed, Oh Great Pineapple.

JoeSapphire: I really think that you should prod nmillar and QuadrAlien.

I guess I avoided being included here by posting few minutes before you. :-)

Ok, I don't like Amok's unprompted eyebrow wiggling half-claim. Especially when he follows it up with "I am not claiming anything at all yet...".

This sort of half claiming when put under a bit of pressure seems really scummy to me. Hinting at being something important without being prompted and without giving any actual info just seems slippery. If you're not ready to claim yet, why start claiming?

I am extremely disappointed that nobody has called me out for lurking yet.

Stop lurking.

Stop trying to detract from your obviously guilty demeanour.

Fine.

the reason why I do not have any likes or clues is that I came here with poor Bernie, he was my owner.

I am Fluffy McPawski, his trusted St.Bernhard. I am neutral, and I am here now for one reason only - to sniff out the killers and revenge my master. This is why I win when town wins (all killers are dead - yeay) and loose when scum wins (I did not get my revenge - boooo). It is also why JMich's clue is correct, my gender is not given.

...

Woof

But JMich is scum, so supporting his "clue" makes you scum too. Robbeasy is the third, which is the usual number of mafia, so that's pretty much job done.

There are a higher than normal number of players though, so there may be another member somewhere that I haven't figured out yet, but those 3 will do for starters. Let's get voting!

And do not forget that scum may actually have 'correct' clues, but they do not identify the killers. As JMich's clue does :)

Does anyone have "bite marks" as a clue ?

(Because that would leave only one pair of ski trails unidentified...)

I admit I missed a lot of what happened in this game so far so couls you tell me how does it identifies tracks and what are the other identified tracks?

Also 10 days is not looming deadline and calling it that way if fearmongering.

3 pairs of ski tracks.

amok = 4 legs.

Actually, this would support the theory of a 4 person mafia. 3 sets of ski tracks, plus 1 dog (no skis).