It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
P1na: I was going to say that if they could double kill, Telika and I would have been the targets, but if as you said we Rod was the handkerchief killer (must have missed that) my role is pretty much obsolete so no point killing me. I don't help much on the deducing front, after all.
Rodzaju was mafia flavour cop. Handkerchief killer visited me Night 2, so it is very likely to be him as nothing happeneed to me. There was also blonde hair found on handkerchief by Telika so he very likely visited nmillar on N1.

avatar
P1na: As for the vigilante option, that begs the question why he didn't kill before.
Could be one-shot, could be just careful, could be Darko who is SK and chose to kill only know when he knew he won't be killed by mafia. But yeah, I get where are you coming from.
avatar
DarkoD13: Didn't one of the scum in the previous game have a power that could kill when it was used multiple times on the same person?
Yes.
avatar
DarkoD13: Didn't one of the scum in the previous game have a power that could kill when it was used multiple times on the same person?
Yes, why?
How is it relevat to this game?
SPF is long dead, Rodzaju targeted different people and last scum killed this night.
avatar
Vitek: Yes, why?
How is it relevat to this game?
SPF is long dead, Rodzaju targeted different people and last scum killed this night.
I don't remember how the power worked, so I'll take your word for it if you think it's irrelevant.


avatar
Vitek: There was also blonde hair found on handkerchief by Telika so he very likely visited nmillar on N1.
That can't be true since the handkerchief outside your room should also have boot polish.
Argghh noooo!
Argghh noooo!
avatar
Red_Baron: Argghh noooo!
Zombies! RUN!!!!
!oooon hhggrA
I'm looking at a "power" which can do a thing several times in a row and then effect a kill.

Any comments??

I have no such knowledge other than seeing two kills just like everyone else.

It would be nice to have someone come forward with information, but I guess that would be to easy. I know, right??
Is there a good reason for me not to suspect JMich since he hasn't reported back yet, CSPVG's report notwithstanding??
avatar
flubbucket: Is there a good reason for me not to suspect JMich since he hasn't reported back yet, CSPVG's report notwithstanding??
I'm an innocent lady that knows nothing of tonight's activities? Let me properly wake up and see what we currently have then.
So if everyone's denying it, it probably wasn't town activity, right?
So, CSPVG claims to have visited me, P1na claims to have stolen from Red_Baron, Darko should be out in the woods again. That leaves 3 people, one of which is known to have an undisclosed night action.

Now, it is possible that Red's death was something akin to a reverse innocent child, though I do find that improbable. It would make sense with Rod's claim of not wanting Red to be murdered, but since Rod flipped scum, that win condition could very well be a lie.

Now, my current suspects are CSPVG, though Telika's list of actions does seem to clear him, and the enigma known as Vitek. I'm not sure if I want to get in more Vitek arguments though, but I would like to know what Vitek action is, and who he used it on tonight, if he did indeed use it.
avatar
JMich: it is possible that Red's death was something akin to a reverse innocent child, though I do find that improbable.
What's that?

I had initially suspected it as a one-shot vigilante action by a town Vitek based on his first few posts about it, but he would have come forward if that was the case. That's why I started considering the mafia power from the previous game as an alternative.

What annoys me the most right now is the level of confusion CSPVG brings to the game. He had semi-cleared flub, now he clears you while he casts doubt over his flub result. That and the way he claimed in the first place don't make me particularly eager to trust him.
avatar
JMich: it is possible that Red's death was something akin to a reverse innocent child, though I do find that improbable.
avatar
DarkoD13: What's that?
Innocent child? I was thinking of the third variant, meaning alignment revealed after X days, but in this case more of a "If you're alive after Day 4, you die".