Well, first off, I've never read another game where the mod has been a player. And, to be honest, with rules that seem to be based towards insanity, he might not be a player, just messing with our heads. What I'm concerned with right now is that lynching the mod, even if it does give us some minor piece of information, removes our ability to read into the lynch. We have a wagon, but no case (Because we can isn't a case), a defense, reactions, a claim, there's a lot of information that we potentially lose at this point. And a vote record does help the town.

As far as my scum reads. I'm curious of Damnation and SPF, due to the lynch the mod call, but I'm not really sure. I think I'm gonna reread tomorrow and see what pieces stick together. Too tired right now, not gonna change my vote right now with my mind sorta, half asleep. Will add more in the morrow.

I think I found the problem I had with lynching the mod, but it is more of a question (as I am still figuring out how this works :)):
If the mod is lynched, (s)he is dead. In the rules a person who is killed can no longer post in the thread. This means that if the mod is lynched (s)he can no longer post here. Surely this is not right? (if you are not going down the Sandman way and what is killed is a point of view, i.e you then get a different version of the mod, which may actually be interesting)

Also to address a logical fault with the true/false question. If I understand the statement correctly, the person forced to lie is not forced to lie all the time, but have a limited number of posts, then (s)he must lie. This means that when answering this question, they may be in a position where they are able to tell the truth. It is not clear from Zchinque posts whether a forced lier need to lie in all posts... so if someone is under this restriction there is an option to bypass it - waiting for the conditions of the restriction to lift, and then post "true".

(my posts always gets very rambling when I am not editing them, but I hope the sentiment gets through)

All of the players in this game are humen: True/False

True

(Though I suspect that the post restriction wouldn't be along the lines of 'You must lie at every opportunity' because that's... that's just mad. Yeah I know it's set in a mental asylum. Yeah I know.
I'ld expect it to be something like "You must claim to have no powers" or "You must claim to be male" or "If asked where you were on the night of the murder you must reply "I only just arrived"")

Moderator: (Or Spirits that do collect within these living quarters, whose knowledge of the souls of mortal man is complete and infallible) if the majority lynchvotes an unlynchable target, will that end the day?

amok, why was this post edited?!?!

All of the players in this game are human: True/False? True

I also would echo the potential of the mod being the liar. But the statement was "townies" with a "post restriction" so there is room for interpretation correct??

oh hell. at least one of us is paying attention.

Sorry, my mistake. Forgot about this forum having the 5 min rule.

I posted the first bit just as an answer to your question, and a few min later I thought about the last bit... In an ideal world (forum) this would have been 2 of mine posts, one after the other, and none of them would have the "edited" tag

10 minutes actually, not 5.

Amok's edited post has been noted. Due to this being amok's first game with us, and that I have no reason to believe this was more than a common double post, I have decided to be lenient and will not invoke any sanctions towards him.

This is the only warning amok, and indeed all of you, will get. Any further posts that shows as edited - whether it's because of actual editing or the more likely double post - will lead to a modkill of the player in question.

Now let us all grumble about some of the annoyances the GOG forum software brings.

That question is much too open-ended for me to answer.

To the moderator:

For example, a vote for Robbeasy is not counted in the official votecount. If 7 voted for Robbeasy would that bring about The End Of Day?

Another example, a player may have the Lynchproof power or equivalent. Would forming a majority vote against such a player end the day?

Finally, votes for Zchinque appear in the votecount. If 7 vote for Zchinque, would that end the day?

No problem, duly noted. Will not happen again.

Yo! I really don't think I should be doing your thinking for you, but I'll humour you just this once. QuadrAlien earlier attempted to vote for Rob. He showed up as not voting in the votecount. A majority of people not voting do not end the day. These questions, even if hypothetical in nature, depend on information that is not public knowledge. As such, I will not be able to give you a clear answer, but I refer you to the rules in the first post of this very thread.

GOG forum software caused all my children to be born toothless and naked.

Even....tually (I know nothing about Dragonfly or Nitwit)

Okay I'll play.

Unvote: SapphireJoe

Vote: Zchinque

Ummmmm, I just got a message over the GOG Messages. It's not from the mod so I'm posting it Verbatim.

[i]EnsembleOfShaows
[/i]
[i]All of the players in this game are human: True/False.
False [/i]

This was marked as 9 hours ago, as of this post. Haven't reread anything yet, but I'm a little confused now.