Xaromir: We have reviews on the games sites already.
I'm thinking about trivia and background stories,
or what did you mean?
I may also write 1 or 2 things there.
PhoenixWright: As was noted in the original post (two long/short years ago!) the reviews under many games seem more like comments, and they aren't really in-depth. I guess when I say review I really mean review/discussion, not just a "graphics-good, gameplay-pretty-good, score-7.5" review.
HOLY... ! I thought this was a new idea.
Thanks for the heads up. Yes i noted that many reviews aren't exactly great,
but i think it doesn't belong in a Wiki, but i have to say i only participated on wikipedia so far,
i guess it can be what ever people want it to be, but i think a link to a review would be the better choice.
For two reasons:
1. Reviews usually contain opinions, i remember some edit wars on wikipedia been quite nasty.
2. We still have a review system, if you want to improve it's content, this can be done without a wiki.
That's the thought i have at the moment, not sure how helpful that is.
But i think keeping to the facts an hones descriptions of the games content and features
may serve the same purpose, in helping John Doe with the question if he may like it or not.