I'm going to cut some content from my post aimed at Joe, sorry, post is too long :D
JoeSapphire: It's good to hear from Damnation. Seems to be sort of hot-headed and, what's the word I'm looking for? I shall liken him to an angry debatist in the house of commons. No that's not what I'm going for. Anyway. He has intimated that it's his style and that worries me slightly. Justifying a vicious playing style before he's even begun, but I'm not really getting too much stench of evil from him.
That's pretty much my playstyle in a nutshell, I'm vicious, aggressive and have no bars when it comes to arguing in this. Plus, I tend to come up with as many possible scenarios as I can, not in order to cause confusion, but to make sure everyone is damned clear on what kind of actions they can take, so they are not goaded into making the wrong ones.
Now, as I said, I don't think your post gives a lot to go on, and my opinion has not shirked one bit about you - like I said, you could be lying, and the impression I have of you so far tells me that you most likely are.
And in recent events, I'm not going to pound on nmillar for the time being, and I will explain why later in this post. Therefore,
unvote itai.sharim... Oh boy, were to begin... You really stepped in it, didn't you?
Damnation: but he sure did assist in it.
itai.sharim: When and how?
Let's continue the point-by-point arguing for just a little while - this question I cannot fathom you bother to ask, we got into said rabbit hole because Rodzaju revealed information best left secret, and how did he get there? bazilisek and nmillar (Plus others, including yourself, mind you) kept pushing him for doing so. A man who is being pushed performs all the wrong actions - always consider Murphy's Law, no matter what. Rodzaju, being pounded on, said multiple times he wanted people to stop it because it didn't help, and initially many dropped of his back, main exceptions being baz and nmillar. It took still some time for nmillar to back off, and as such, nmillar assisted in pushing us into the rabbit hole
Damnation: your original question clearly seem to omit the fact that I mentioned baz in the exact line you take issue with.
itai.sharim: Correct. I have found no contradiction regarding your statement about baz.
Up until now that is.
Oh dear, either you're a complete idiot or completely missed my point, or you wish to cause confusion. There is absolutely no contradiction, and why is actually very simple, anyone bothering to read just my original post and our parley will see that. I mentioned that in mafia 2, Ubivis, who falseclaimed town doctor, got loads of flak for doing so, and I therefore pointed out that baz's claim could easily also have been a falseclaim - how are we to know? As such, I pointed out the staggering similarity of unprovoked roleclaiming, yet the stark contrast in reactions. I think that's pretty much going at baz for doing his claim, and mind you, I did not attack Ubivis during game 2 for his roleclaim, I said it was stupid, and I said so about baz's claim, so do be so kind to point out the contradiction?
Damnation: Ubivis roleclaimed town doctor ... he turned out to be the mafia roleblocker.
itai.sharim: Yet you vote nmillar.
Your point being? My vote on nmillar is reasoned openly in post 308 - why have you not read that? And do not say you have, for it is evident you have not, otherwise you would not be making this quoted statement
Damnation: why do you take issue with something I say about nmillar?
itai.sharim: I have no issue with you saying something about nmillar. My issue is with contradicting statements, especially if made on the same post.
Indeed you do, why else become so hostile when I attack nmillar? I have only mentioned my observations of you until now, clearly attacking nmillar cought your attention and triggered hostility?
Damnation: unless you're both mafia and you're foolishly attempting to protect your scumbuddy ...
itai.sharim: You agree it would have been foolish of me to try and protect my "scumbuddy" but yet you claim I'm triggering your "scumdar".
Call me stupid if you'd like, but how exactly are these mutually exclusive? You trigger my scumdar, and it's foolish of you to protect your scumbuddy. How does me saying it's foolish of you to protect your scumbuddy omit you triggering my scumdar?
Damnation: BUT you disregard the fact that this elaboration came two days AFTER, meaning he obviously had plenty of time to reread the thread ...
itai.sharim: You are really missing my point here. Since post 39 nmillar based his claim upon the flavor (as evident by his post 39 quoting). Never did he admit slipping, nor tried to explain it in any other way. His claim was always constructed upon the flavor.
This is clearly defending nmillar. I didn't miss your point, but you somehow missed mine. He quoted flavour in the post, yes. Has he said since then that he based the "There are more mafia in this game" on that? No, he didn't, not until late. He has later said that if you follow the usual setup guidelines, then dragging in the flavour, he arrived at what he assumes to be how the setup is. His first post was still "there are more mafia in this game" - omitted completely of "I think" or "my theory is" or the like, the way he presented it was as if he thought it fact, THAT IS WHERE THE ISSUE IS! Later arguments (In this case, two days after the fact) are not solid enough to back up an earlier statement like that, simply because others cannot know if you're just attempting to cover your own ass becuase you reread the post you made and realised you made a mistake. And yes he haven't admitted to slipping, he has enforced his statement is proper, without and argumentation at the time it was made, how can you claim his theory was always based on the flavour? How can you KNOW I ask, not WHY DO YOU THINK for you obviously do KNOW it's based on the flavour, otherwise you would not have worded your post as you did. And claiming a post is based upon a quote just because it is quoted is horseshit, what I am typing here is not related to my quote of JoeSapphire's post. Part of my post was, yes, and I have made clear what parts, nmillar did NOT make it clear that "there are more mafia in this game" was refering to the flavour, or if it were based on the flavour, all he stated that was clearly based on the flavour was "pointing this out as people seem to have missed it" - which is perculiar, he was the first one to even mention multiple mafia factions, no discussion had really been delved into the subject before he mentioned it...
Damnation: Actually, why are you so set on protecting nmillar?
itai.sharim: More attacking you than protecting nmillar.
You have all probably guessed it by now -
Vote Damnation No, it's a protection of nmillar hidden behind an attack, otherwise your attacks would not be so much in favour of arguing solely on my points against nmillar.
itai.sharim: I think Rodzaju won't survive many nights, nor will bazilisek.
Under this assumption, should Rodzaju share his information or take it to the grave?
Why do people keep quoting half sentences is beyond me.
Wondering why I put this here? Good. This single line:
itai.sharim: Why do people keep quoting half sentences is beyond me.
I strongly doubt I need to requote or explain it to anyone... But I'm thinking you will ask me to anyway.
itai.sharim: My only immediate suspect is QuadrAlien because he quoted half a sentence of mine and was confusing everyone (although he did apologize for that).
However, there are many who posted next to nothing and we are already a week since the game started - suspicious.
Read my just previous statement - I doubt explanation is required.
So thank you, itai.sharim, you just moved up as my number one candidate for being mafia.
vote itai.sharim