Posted February 01, 2012
NotFrenchYet: Ah! Baz, that's an interesting point you bring up in #1280 about a single-player 3rd mafia faction - wouldn't that explain the traitor?
Okie dokie. I was re-reading with tea and nutella, and in the depths of the thread, I found this: ...
Except, y'know, this is the only piece of serious scum hunting you've done the whole time... ;)
I thought there was something odd about the pressure on Baron when he paraphrased his PM - out of the three people applying serious pressure, two are now confirmed mafia. SirPrimalform! A moment of your time, please.
I'd like to put this down to being bad at scum hunting (I do feel that my deductive skills are lacking) but I know that won't be enough to convince anyone. :P Okie dokie. I was re-reading with tea and nutella, and in the depths of the thread, I found this: ...
Except, y'know, this is the only piece of serious scum hunting you've done the whole time... ;)
I thought there was something odd about the pressure on Baron when he paraphrased his PM - out of the three people applying serious pressure, two are now confirmed mafia. SirPrimalform! A moment of your time, please.
I'd like to think that if I was mafia, I wouldn't be as stupid as to join in on an attack with my scumbuddies. Out of interest, who were the other two? I think Orry was one of them, which would make the other one a member of the other faction, right?
NotFrenchYet: Now, I know for fact that you've had genuine reasons for absence (jeez I sound like a teacher!), which is why I'm not calling you out for that.
But I read back for Primal-posts, and some of them do seem rather off. For example, #541:
Wha? What was the basis for that deduction? And what relevence did/does it have to anything?
It was so long ago I honestly can't remember. I wish I could say more. But I read back for Primal-posts, and some of them do seem rather off. For example, #541:
Wha? What was the basis for that deduction? And what relevence did/does it have to anything?
NotFrenchYet: Primal also vaguely supported a night 0 theory until Violator stepped in to clarify (#550, #176).
Otherwise his posting tends to follow one of two forumlae: either agreeing with the quoted poster ... or suggesting alternatives to the quoted idea ... without actually offering anything of his own.
... including full reads. He states his supicions occasionally but hardly ever votes to back them up ... and has never actually posted a full read on everyone. He was miles way from all three lynches.
I wanted to avoid going all metagamey, but that's unfortunately how I always play. I am bad at being town. Otherwise his posting tends to follow one of two forumlae: either agreeing with the quoted poster ... or suggesting alternatives to the quoted idea ... without actually offering anything of his own.
... including full reads. He states his supicions occasionally but hardly ever votes to back them up ... and has never actually posted a full read on everyone. He was miles way from all three lynches.
I can't really fault your reasoning there, I have been playing unconstructively.
In a vague attempt to rectify that, here are some thoughts (not really reads, but the best I can come up with):
Red_Baron: Possible third Gambiani member - His kill happened on the night we would have expected a Gambiani kill assuming they're alternating
nmillar: I'm now fairly certain he's town, I'm not sure of the reliability/usefulness of his info though
I thought I had more but I've got a block now. Maybe in ten minutes I'll have dredged some more thoughts out.
I hope I haven't screwed the formatting up...