No. I. Didn't.

I think that was what SPF meant by the above. I'm interested too, do you have a penalty for not abiding by the post restriction?

... Whaaa? I don't follow that at all...

Something I don't understand:
Vitek 'post'ed so xyem could continue, however, how did he know that xyem wanted to continue, unless they have been talking outside game- which implies a mafia board thing. Unless one of them can link me to a general discussion thread where this happened, like last time.

Ah I see, sorry Xyem, my bad.

I... I still don't see how those two points are contradictions. There's an implied change of heart, yes, but that doesn't make them mutually exclusive.

In that case, you should be equally suspicious of Primal for his flagrant contradiction in a matter of sentences, i.e. #937

Ahem.

Should really learn how to quote as would help avoid misunderstandings. NotFrenchYet when I was talking about Rodzaju's restriction it was in response to Vitek (post 929). See you're now making things up. As I never posted “She lied! We should lynch her!". Also not sure how trying to identify all the mafia isn't pro town play.

@Vitek Do you have a post restriction that prevents you fully claiming or all you just been difficult?

Cheers, thanks Vitek.

@Pazzer, when you float your mouse over someone's post, a yellow 'reply' button comes up- that opens a new window with the quote. that's how I've been doing it anyhow.

Yes, I paraphrased for comic (?) effect. The post in question is #934:
Due to the order of posts I assumed you were talking about the "contradiction" xyem found. Again, apologies if I misunderstood.

There's no contradiction. Earlier on in that post I said

"Xyem is by far the scummiest person in my eyes for obvious reasons."

"I don't have any strong reads either way for the other players" means what it says. Other players.

I'll forgive you though as your brain is probably fried from all that NaNoing. :P


@littlerabbit: A discussion thread like this? http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/forum_mafia_administration_and_general_discussion_1/post34

Did I read that right? You brought up "Lynch all liars" in response to Rod wondering if it's worth asking for an explanation? o.O

The shadow of the stone pillars falls out, creeping across the ground.

Day Five Third Votecount
With seven alive it takes four votes to lynch.

2 - Xyem (cast by LittleRabbit and SirPrimalform)
1 - Vitek (cast by Rodzaju)

Not Voting - Vitek, NotFrenchYet, Pazzer, xyem

Xyem is closest to lynch at L-2

Hey I can't help but notice that post 932 has been editted. What's all that about?

The votecount has been editted sorry about that.

Oi, I voted for Xyem as well. This is the second time you've forgotten to count my votes.

@NFY:
If Orry's trigger (the 2 sequential nights in a row) had been triggered later it would have resulted in a mafia win (presuming 3 mafia). Even swapping the days Orry and Muttly died would have very likely resulted in that.

The reason why they contradict is because the change of heart is only implied. There is nothing at all to explain it and you never even gave a reason for suddenly wanting to unvote him when I pointed out the contradiction. And the way you tried to defend against it was.. peculiar to say the least.

And then again, trying to deflect attention onto SirPrimalform even though he clearly stated "other players".

@pazzer: Didn't you agree with Vitek to lynch me at the deadline if nothing came up? Why do you now say (#956) that you couldn't vote for me?

@littlerabbit: There was a discussion about my claim yesterday..

@SirPrimalform: You know you're lurking when even the moderator doesn't notice you posted :P

@Joe: Huh.. so it is. My connection was playing up yesterday so I guess it was that.

I still find it quite strange that despite the explicit agreement and obvious support to lynch me.. people are still pushing to lynch me now instead of doing it closer to the deadline. Surely those extra days would be better spent finding out mafia members? Or am I missing something?