It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
There is of course another way to confirm my claim, but I think it's a lousy idea.

Place 5 votes on Pazzer.
If I'm telling the truth, he will not die.
Of course, If I'm lying, I hear you argue "it's more or less game over", which is why it's a lousy idea.
Even if I'm telling the truth, It would be very easy for the mafia to add that extra vote & kill him anyway.

So IF your suspicous enough to want to test this, I reccomend that 2 townies (& pazzer) DO NOT VOTE HIM.
That way, he is safe & I am confirmed.

I'll start us off.
Vote Pazzer
I'll leave it up to you....
avatar
Rodzaju: So IF your suspicous enough to want to test this, I reccomend that 2 townies (& pazzer) DO NOT VOTE HIM.
That way, he is safe & I am confirmed.
I see a bit of problem with your plan. I think mafia won't co-operate so easily...
avatar
Rodzaju: So IF your suspicous enough to want to test this, I reccomend that 2 townies (& pazzer) DO NOT VOTE HIM.
That way, he is safe & I am confirmed.
avatar
Vitek: I see a bit of problem with your plan. I think mafia won't co-operate so easily...
It was just a thought...
The whole point of getting claims out in the open was to examine them & try to pin down the scum.
All we seem to be getting is a whole lot of wine, so I do what I can to cut through the crap....
avatar
Vitek: Well I think it's time for me to claim too, right? But it would really be better to leave it alone.
This bothers me somewhat. Let me line up my assumptions for claritys sake...

1 - Vitek says this as he likely has some sort of power role that he loses if he discusses. Perfectly reasonable for him to present in this fashion.
2 - Assuming he has a power role of some kind he would have used it over the past three nights to come up with some useful information.
3 - He has spent a large amount of time mapping out his case against me.

So, there are my assumptions. If you think those sound reasonable, I will now take you to my line of thought... I have a somewhat unique perspective on this as I KNOW I am Town. If you can believe that, then it begs the question why he is spending his time on me. The obvious answer is of course he knows I am town as well. None of this came together in my head until he decided to not claim and brush it off.

To be fair and balanced... The Issues!

1 - You must believe I am town.
2 - You must presume that he cant state his claim as he will lose his ability.
3 - Even if all this true, what was he doing with all the rest of his time?

Responses....

1 - Take as you will.
2 - Perhaps he just feels that strongly about revealing any information. He has persistently objected to the claims up to this point. I suppose that’s possible.
3 - Why... he spent them watching TwlightBard and Bazilisek of course.... as the Mafia Cop.

Thats why he was in the Ballroom with the Candlestick all along!!!!! Sorry, carried away a bit there. Anyway, thats my latest thought.
avatar
Vitek: Well I think it's time for me to claim too, right? But it would really be better to leave it alone.
Have you been following Game 9?

I think, assuming you are town, you have just painted a big target on your own back.
No-one else claims a role that gives them a useful ability tonight.

It would be helpful to get whatever info you have out into the open while you still can.
avatar
Rodzaju: It was just a thought...
The whole point of getting claims out in the open was to examine them & try to pin down the scum.
All we seem to be getting is a whole lot of wine, so I do what I can to cut through the crap....
Eh, you asked mafia to vote pazzer and town to stay away...

avatar
muttly13: 1 - Vitek says this as he likely has some sort of power role that he loses if he discusses. Perfectly reasonable for him to present in this fashion.
2 - Assuming he has a power role of some kind he would have used it over the past three nights to come up with some useful information.
3 - He has spent a large amount of time mapping out his case against me.

1 - You must believe I am town.
2 - You must presume that he cant state his claim as he will lose his ability.
3 - Even if all this true, what was he doing with all the rest of his time?

Responses....

1 - Take as you will.
2 - Perhaps he just feels that strongly about revealing any information. He has persistently objected to the claims up to this point. I suppose that’s possible.
3 - Why... he spent them watching TwlightBard and Bazilisek of course.... as the Mafia Cop.

*redakčně kráceno*
Or maybe I am convinced you are mafia, have you thought about this possibility? Even if you are town you should consider this.
How could you know I watched Twilight and bazilišek? (I didn't btw.)
So because I did case against you it means I had time at night to watch some people. Shouldn't it be opposite?
avatar
Rodzaju: It was just a thought...
The whole point of getting claims out in the open was to examine them & try to pin down the scum.
All we seem to be getting is a whole lot of wine, so I do what I can to cut through the crap....
avatar
Vitek: Eh, you asked mafia to vote pazzer and town to stay away...
If they had gone for it, it would have made them easier to identify....
But if it's not going to fly:
Unvote
Yeah, that's my point, who would ever fall for this?
avatar
Vitek: redakčně kráceno
That's a real disapointment.

I was hoping it would turn out to be some useful information!
But Google says no :(
avatar
Vitek: Or maybe I am convinced you are mafia, have you thought about this possibility? Even if you are town you should consider this.
How could you know I watched Twilight and bazilišek? (I didn't btw.)
So because I did case against you it means I had time at night to watch some people. Shouldn't it be opposite?
- I have, and its possible. Hence, I broke everything down quite clearly as my assumptions and thoughts, removing them from facts. Plus, I didnt immediately vote you, I would like to see other peoples responses, if any.
- I dont know, I am speculating based on your responses and presenting why I believe my speculation may be true.
- Not what I said. You had three nights to use powers. Taking the time to write up about me was simply an investment of your own time, not game time. Again, as I know I am town that leaves me with an interesting perspective I chose to share.
avatar
SirPrimalform: You said you claimed ages ago, implying that sheep was indeed your claim.
avatar
xyem: If I hit Joe in the face with a pole, it doesn't mean it is my pole.
... wait, what? I understand what you mean there, but it's not a comparable analogy... Are you saying that if you claim sheep, it doesn't mean it's your claim? Or your sheep? Or what?

@Pazzer, I'm confused about your softclaim back on D1 - how does that fit with you being the miracle maker?

@Rabbit : Is a flavour thief different from a flavour cop?
avatar
NotFrenchYet: @Rabbit : Is a flavour thief different from a flavour cop?
as I understand it, cop gets a positive result; yes or no; whereas theif only get a hint, I only got that Rod was a magic user, not his orientation.
avatar
NotFrenchYet: @Rabbit : Is a flavour thief different from a flavour cop?
avatar
littlerabbit: as I understand it, cop gets a positive result; yes or no; whereas theif only get a hint, I only got that Rod was a magic user, not his orientation.
There can be a number of different cop roles.
The traditional cop (Orry) gets a guilty / innocent type result.
A Role cop gets the role (Vanilla, tracker, whatever).
A name cop get's the character name.
A flavour cop gets flavour info on the target.
This last is very similar to your flavour thief.
Presumably you steal something that indicates the flavour of the target.
avatar
NotFrenchYet: ... wait, what? I understand what you mean there, but it's not a comparable analogy...
SPF said that me claiming is the same as it being my claim.
Action does not dictate ownership.

Just because I hit Joe with a pole, doesn't mean it is my pole.
Just because I claimed to be sheep, doesn't mean it is my claim.
avatar
NotFrenchYet: ... wait, what? I understand what you mean there, but it's not a comparable analogy...
avatar
xyem: SPF said that me claiming is the same as it being my claim.
Action does not dictate ownership.

Just because I hit Joe with a pole, doesn't mean it is my pole.
Just because I claimed to be sheep, doesn't mean it is my claim.
Just repeating the same thing doesn't really help..
Is it an incorrect claim you've been forced to make; yes or no?