Ah, you are obious newb. I have ten page psychological analysis file on every person in this game. And I expect it'll only get bigger. :-D
/jk

I agree with you, I am not sure how was he able to come up with such analysis from few bazilišek's posts.

It's hardly psychoanalysis when baazilisek had demonstrated instances of each in this very thread.

Inconsistenty: He claimed to have voted for me in jest (to not take him seriously because it was RVS) yet had admitted that it was a half-serious vote.
Narcissistic: Thought I was referring to him being fair when I had made no mention of him being unfair.
Won't share information: By his own admission.

If I were 'going for the kill', you wouldn't have "only just read it" because I would have been going "look everyone vote for baazilisek because he is these things".

The fact that I removed my vote for him because the discussion is getting more serious should indicate that any "barbs" it had were those spongy safety ones.

Yyyyes, exactly. This is what worries me. You went out of your way to draw attention to him and make him look suspicious, then you pulled your vote. What were your motives in pursuing the argument as far as you did, and what was the benefit of drawing those conclusions about baziliek if you were only going to write them off as "spongy"?

(... spongy's a good word!)

Because I was trying to explain how the comment that led him to vote for me wasn't part of the game, because it was directed at and for Joe (i.e. how his reasoning was wrong). The conclusions were nothing more than me voicing what I perceived about him to him.

As I said before, if I were trying to draw attention to it, you wouldn't have only just noticed that I said it in the first place.

Acutally, I said "I just read something that made me see the Duel in a new light", followed by an aside that I'd been reading about RVS. Personally I'd been puzzled by the skirmish for a while (see post 104). The 'something' I read was external and a priori had nothing to do with your posts.

Sorry. Couldn't resist..!

Thanks for the clarification though - all that mischief from a misinterpreted and out-of-game comment..! One last question, if I may... You said you voiced your conclusions "about him to him." If you had incurred that same disagreement in private, would you have behaved in the same way?

Heh heh :P Okay.

My issue is that you say I drew attention to it, but that's clearly not the case. If you read, you'll note that the only reason why I voiced it at the particular moment is because it was claimed that the whole thing was pointless. I didn't press it, ask for others opinions, for anyone to take note or even repeat it again. If you hadn't brought it back up, I doubt it would have even been mentioned again! :)

Pretty much. I always get annoyed when people are inconsistent or ignoring the arguments/explanations put before them. As bazilisek seems to have figured, I'm a logically minded person so such things are probably particularly annoying for me. You can probably see it in any debate I've been in on these forums :P

As I said though, I probably wouldn't have voiced my "conclusion" as I wouldn't have such a prompt, but I would point out inconsistencies, where I was ignored etc.

In which case I'm probably gonna drive you nuts!

I like to think I take note note & account of everything, but often don't aknowledge or reply unless I feel that a reply serves a useful purpose...

Things are really heating up. Shame the day will end in a no lynch.

@Bazilisek assume you missed it so will ask again how did Xyem wave his townnisses in our faces and do you think he's town or mafia?

@Vitek why did you call SirPrimalform up for fishing but not Violator?

@TwilightBard curious what meaning your vote for me had as I'd assumed it was just a rvs vote.

Violator makes a good point about Muttly being a lyncher. It certainly makes more sense than my initial though he is mafia. If he is indeed a lyncher it's likely TwilightBard is town.

Though Bazilisek doesn't think a lyncher would be so obvious and for that matter neither do I. Also Muttly hasn't claimed lyncher which is surprising given it's an open secret.

So it could be Violator taking advantage of Muttly's fixation to make his mafia buddy appear town.

Not sure what to make of SirPrimalform's reluctance to lynch a new player but willingness to lynch Muttly.

Also confusing me is NotFrenchYet as it seems he's trying to set people up to be lynched by twisting things.

As for the soft claiming I think it's a bad idea as it helps the mafia out with finding the power roles. But as we're claiming I'm la li lu le lo.

Deadline is looming so I need to place my vote somewhere vote NotFrenchYet

He answered :P

It was in regards to me complaining to Joe that putting the deadline on while there was plenty of activity was unfair on town.

See xyem's post. I really don't want to talk about this silly affair any more, as it's not helping anyone except the mafia.

("That's exactly what scum would say! Afraid he had made a slip there! Boo!")

If the deadline is serious, and I hope it's not, we're screwed.

unvote
vote ViolatorX

I did explain what I meant before. It wasn't reluctance to lynch a new player, I was speaking outside of the game and saying that if we were going to lynch someone for no reason whatsoever that I wouldn't vote for a new player. I'm fine with voting for a newbie if they've done something to make me suspicious.

Having said all that, I don't feel I have strong suspicions of anyone but this bloody deadline is looming, so vote Xyem..?

We haven't had a vote count for 2 days, the deadline is today. Vote count please!

Soft shadows sweep long across the grass. The day is, indeed, almost over.

Day One Fifth Votecount
With twelve alive it takes seven votes to lynch.

2 - TwilightBard (cast by Muttly13 and LittleRabbit)
2 - xyem (cast by NotFrenchYet and SirPrimalform)
2 - NotFrenchYet (cast by Rodzaju and Pazzer)
1 - Bazilisek (cast by Vitek)
1 - Orryyrro (cast by ViolatorX)
1 - ViolatorX (cast by Bazilisek)

Not Voting - TwilightBard, Orryyrro, xyem

TwilightBard, Xyem, Notfrenchyet are tied closest to lynch at L-5.

This day will end in 32 hours. (Tues 18 Oct 23:00 Greenwich Mean Time)
ah prod yu face!

votes xyem

The deadline is close and he seems the most suspicious by a small margin.