Hope you guys can learn something from it.

Stop twitching your finger on the scroll wheel!
(no problems on chrome here)

Why do people want to see it separate? I don't get it. And what would they do when a `new' game becomes an `old' game? It seems an unnecessary hassle to split this up. I don't see what the gain would be.

I would use optional GOG.com client that lets me

forgive my ignorance but what do you mean by Client?

I too answered no to the day-1 releases because it's all about the good old games, but I still really much appreciate sister site type releases, that's a given. :)

Maybe you could have some sort of independent game release type of deal, from all times of gaming.

Not only a client, but the whole distribution platform, but much better than Steam, at least if they keep it clean and DRM free. I love good old gaming!

Yeah, with the number of games requiring steam and it's console-style restrictive client, the more services offering no DRM or sensible DRM the better, so I went yes, but like you I would rather see them on a separate section of the site or separate site as the publishers would want advertising which is likely to clash with GoG's current style of individually presenting and describing games one at a time without making silly claims or splashing distracting animated adverts everywhere.

Let's put it this way: I think of this site as a specialised store, and don't want to see it become yet another supermarket. Because there is no other specialised store around half as good as this one, while supermarkets, ranging from decent to very good, are all over the place.

I have suggested they do a propper survey, but hey, lets get the ball rolling so to speak.

1/ Did you own an AMIGA A500?

2/ would you like to see old AMIGA games here?

3/ would you buy them?

Wiggy

I like the idea of getting DRM-free games so much that I'd probably buy somewhat more games if I could get them here, even new. On the other hand, GOG = Good Old Games and I'm not sure I want new games here. I mean, I wouldn't mind... But it kinda contradicts the basic idea. Someone mentioned a sister site and I agree. I would probably use it. Or maybe extend GOG so that Good Old Games is only a part of the larger site.

Anyway, I'm not terribly fond of buying $50 games (and much less 50€ games) and I can't really afford to buy many of them so it won't make a huge difference... But other new games, sure, why not, as long as I can afford them. I like my games DRM-free, and that pretty much means no mandatory client as well. That's why I hate Steam: I'd probably love it if it were optional but it is not. Also one of the major reasons why I still haven't bough some games I really want: Total War: Shogun 2, Civilization V, Deus Ex: Human Revolution... Especially the new Deus Ex is already so cheap that if it didn't require me to use Steam, I'd already have bought it.

So is the question refering to a GOG "steam like" program...

Thank you for not taking the survey and increasing my chances at winning. Oh, and your "I want a free game for 2 minutes of my time" is your choice, but don't you understand that the data will be used to make the service better? That doesn't seem worth it to you?

Good grief.

What functionality would it have?

I think we can take it as a given that it's not going to claw it's way into games like steam and very few, if any, games on GoG are likely to get patches so what would it offer apart from a game downloads (which are already in a single place on the website anyway)?

Done, and really hope it helps. I was kinda conflicted about last question, until I realised that us Europeans always get the equation 1 Euro = 1 Dollar on Steam and (at least where I live) retail is even worse

Everyone gets 6 of them free :P