timppu: Funny, I have no objection of keeping all my Pink Floyd music in digital files on my hard drive, which I can easily copy to any of my electronic devices capable of playing mp3 music. I don't like the idea that all those devices should download the same music through ITunes. My mp3 car stereo does not even support ITunes.
keeveek: With my current connection downloading Pink Floyd discography would take me around 30 minutes. There is no reason why should I
store them all the time.
Lately, I don't even download music at all anymore, I am perfectly fine with my Spotify account.
PBay is blocked here, and downloading the music (while at the same time sharing it to others) is still illegal.
You are obviously fine with paying monthly to Spotify Premium to play the Pink Floyd music you have already bought before. I am not. Also, my car stereo does not support Spotify either.
keeveek: and your solution is to buy new external HDDs over and over again up to the point the new HDDs will no longer support old file systems?
Ummm, what are you blabbing about? The digital file does not really care what the underlying file system is, as long as the file system is not archaic compared to the one where the file was created. I can store the same files on NTFS, ext4, whatever file system Android is using etc. If a new file system becomes dominant, I simply copy the files from the old file system to the new one, just like I did from FAT to NTFS, or how I keep copying files between my Linux and Windows partitions.
keeveek: And if you're still using magnetic external HDDs (because flash ones are too small), you can loose all your data in a second.
Actually it is the other way around. Magnetic HDDs much rarely die in an instant, without SMART giving lots of warning signs beforehand etc. It is the SSDs that have sometimes had the problems of a firmware error wiping out the whole disk just like that, without any pre-warning.
And in a case like this, I would just take the files from a secondary backup. If I didn't feel the files were important enough to keep several copies around, then I guess they weren't that important. Some backups might be even online, like on GOG servers. But I don't solely rely on that.
timppu: I stopped trusting that as one of the cloud/social services, where our family had lots of our personal videos and photos, sent an email earlier that they are closing their doors. We were in a hurry to download everything back from the service, and decided to make sure we always have local copies of them in a safe place from now on.
keeveek: I don't store my personal files in the cloud not for convenience reasons, backup reasons, but for security reasons.
You can always encrypt your personal files so heavily that not even NSA can open them. If you really feel they would even be interested in them.
So, what was the real reason you don't keep your personal photos and videos online?
keeveek: Those photos which we hold dearer to our hearts, we print and store in albums. Like some old people. But analog is rather trustworthy.
But what if a volcano erupts next to your home, and all your albums are engulfed in fire? What do you do then, huh?!? Using your earlier logic, that's why you should keep all your personal files only in the cloud, and definitely not keep any local copies of them in albums or HDDs at your home.