It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
StingingVelvet: Personally I really liked this game... short and simple, but fun and with a cool look. Well worth $20 or less, though why it came out at $60 is beyond me. We need varied pricing in video games.
This is also what I think.

I want to add, that I actually liked the "censorship" in the game. It really added to the game.
I would like to enter, and here is something funny http://youtu.be/gRw-lfXy_tQ

Thanks for the giveaway.
avatar
Protoss: I surely don't want to participate, but just to warn that this is one of the worst games I ever played. The camera makes me sick, there is a gay porn chapter (ok, they are just both naked running around, but still...), and the gameplay is mediocre at best.
avatar
StingingVelvet: Of your two complaints one is utterly stupid and the other has an option in the menu to disable shaky-cam.

Personally I really liked this game... short and simple, but fun and with a cool look. Well worth $20 or less, though why it came out at $60 is beyond me. We need varied pricing in video games.
The funny part is that a game journalist from Gamespot(I think this was the site) lost his job over a review of this game. He said exactly how bad it is and he lost his job. From that moment till nowdays I still don't trust sites like Gamespot & IGN on reviews ;)
avatar
StingingVelvet: Of your two complaints one is utterly stupid and the other has an option in the menu to disable shaky-cam.

Personally I really liked this game... short and simple, but fun and with a cool look. Well worth $20 or less, though why it came out at $60 is beyond me. We need varied pricing in video games.
avatar
spinefarm: The funny part is that a game journalist from Gamespot(I think this was the site) lost his job over a review of this game. He said exactly how bad it is and he lost his job. From that moment till nowdays I still don't trust sites like Gamespot & IGN on reviews ;)
I think he was fired because of the first Kane & Lynch game, not the second one. Gave it 6 or 7 over 10. That was back in 2007 i think. The irony is, his site which he created after he lost his job; Giant Bomb now acquired by CBS Interactive, the owner of GameSpot. All hope is gone...
avatar
wormholewizards: I think he was fired because of the first Kane & Lynch game, not the second one. Gave it 6 or 7 over 10. That was back in 2007 i think. The irony is, his site which he created after he lost his job; Giant Bomb now acquired by CBS Interactive, the owner of GameSpot. All hope is gone...
I can't find the article,but maybe I'm wrong. But I do recall someone lost his job over Kane & Lynch. And yes it was 2007 or 2008.
Wow thats a great giveaway :D Thank you! Maybe i am lucky ^^

I try it with lolcatz :)
Post edited April 21, 2012 by CheekyBoinc
Here's a funny video of Skyrim

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTRmAhu08pA
Count me in please!

Funny video: http://youtu.be/Q34z5dCmC4M

Enjoy!
avatar
wormholewizards: I think he was fired because of the first Kane & Lynch game, not the second one. Gave it 6 or 7 over 10. That was back in 2007 i think. The irony is, his site which he created after he lost his job; Giant Bomb now acquired by CBS Interactive, the owner of GameSpot. All hope is gone...
avatar
spinefarm: I can't find the article,but maybe I'm wrong. But I do recall someone lost his job over Kane & Lynch. And yes it was 2007 or 2008.
Yes, you're right. It was Jeff something, forgot his last name. He lost his job because of the average score that he gave; 6/10. Eidos weren't happy because they pay lot of money for advertisement on that site.
avatar
wormholewizards: Yes, you're right. It was Jeff something, forgot his last name. He lost his job because of the average score that he gave; 6/10. Eidos weren't happy because they pay lot of money for advertisement on that site.
I can recall he was a top-notch writer for GameSpot.... and this showed that money make reviews... not the games ;)
Don't mess with the panda

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X21mJh6j9i4
Here we go again..I'm in.
avatar
wormholewizards: I think he was fired because of the first Kane & Lynch game, not the second one. Gave it 6 or 7 over 10. That was back in 2007 i think. The irony is, his site which he created after he lost his job; Giant Bomb now acquired by CBS Interactive, the owner of GameSpot. All hope is gone...
avatar
spinefarm: I can't find the article,but maybe I'm wrong. But I do recall someone lost his job over Kane & Lynch. And yes it was 2007 or 2008.
Yes, the first one (which I also liked). This is about the second one.

Neither game is amazing, but neither game is bad either. They're fun shooters with a unique style.
avatar
spinefarm: I can't find the article,but maybe I'm wrong. But I do recall someone lost his job over Kane & Lynch. And yes it was 2007 or 2008.
avatar
StingingVelvet: Yes, the first one (which I also liked). This is about the second one.

Neither game is amazing, but neither game is bad either. They're fun shooters with a unique style.
They are both mediocre games for have fun it :)
I want a groundfloor penthouse with no one above me.