Bigs: Same PC BS in Australia -
Child pornography laws in Australia prohibit all sexual depictions of children under the age of 18 (or under 16 in some states).
This often includes images of people who merely appear to be under 18. For instance, magazine photographs of women with A breast cup sizes have been censored in recent years, reportedly leading to an increase in the average breast size of women in Australian magazines. [1] Furthermore, there is a zero-tolerance policy in place, which covers purely fictional children as well as real children
It really is pathetic. I know there's an entire niche in the porn industry where girls dress up to look younger so to look underage but really, is it doing any harm? Seems to me that it's better than these people needing to get their jollies elsewhere (usually involving actual kids getting harmed).
I think this is primarily a discussion about condoning versus "nipping it in the bud".
Condoning means that you accept there's people like that out there and instead of letting them find their satisfaction by exploiting kids, you offer legal alternatives (loli manga, 18+ girls acting as if they're younger, etc. etc. etc.).
Nipping in the bud basically clamps down on any such behaviour, believing that doing so will decrease the amount of pedophiles.
Western society leans very heavily towards nipping in the bud yet all evidence points to the opposite being better (look at Japan for starters) - remove all the "legal" alternatives and what you get are a lot of frustrated people who try to find less legal outlets.
In the end, i don't think you can stop pedophiles from existing - so it's a question of whether what society is doing right now is making matters better or worse. Looking at the amount of cases and witch hunts, I'd say the latter.