Thought I put it out in #961 but I'll put on the big list.

Rob - My number one suspect. His habit of quick hammering had gained him this spot on the list. He is the main link to two theories of mine - Rob + TB, Rob + Joe.

Stuart - My number two suspect. I thought he was scum since the big contradiction Zchinque exposed on D1. On D2 and D3 he he had done nothing to correct this impression.

Muttly - 99% town. I'm pretty confident with this one. His D2 play was classic cop.

Vitek - Doing all sorts of scummy stuff like D2 pushing claims, all around twisting cases and the list goes on... The last one bit is today, where he said it would have been stupid of mafia to bus Pazzer but 2/3 of his suspects were voting Pazzer. But, whenever he is called on it, he just pulls his "Get out of prison" card reminding us he was confirmed by cop. I am weary of him.

Joe - Supposed PR, but I don't believe his claim. It just seems too many claimed town power roles. I think he might be in one league with Rob and lynched Pazzer in order to look town.

Peanut - Same as Joe, supposed PR but I don't believe the claim.

TB - I think Vitek's idea of a mafia "name cop" is possible. I say mafia only if Rob flips mafia.

I am starting to think there is a catch with Muttly's investigating ability. Will ponder a bit more about it.

And I am weary of being accused of twisting cases. Which cases have I twisted?

@itai; Do you realise your reads just said you think Rob is scum together with Joe and Twilight is scum if Rob flips scum? And stuart is your number 2 suspect? And you don't believe Penut's claim? And I am scummy? Too many scums out there, don't you think?

I agree I didn't make myself clear.

I think Rob is scum together with Joe or TB.
If he isn't, then my number two suspect is Stuart along with Peanut or Vitek.
I just find it hard to believe so many town power roles. Maybe Joe is valid but Peanut not, or it is the other way around.

@Vitek - I meant posts, and the last example is what you did with Rob's (Post #951).

That I said no interaction and then flurry of interaction on day 3 is bad? Yes, I admit I suspected Robebasy before so I might have be biased against him. And I said it'S twisting because at first I was pointing out no interaction with pazer and then I pointed out interaction with him but it looked odd to me how there suddenly was a lot of interaction.

Do you mind a lot when people call you Peanut here? :-)

It's no twisting, I read it that way. To me it sounds he is detracting from reading trhough as he mentions he was encryptor (therefore no need to interact in game thread) and the questions mark at the end of it sounds like he doubts there is anything to be found.

So Rob is scum with either Joe or Twilight? Why should you think Penut lies about his role, then? It doesn't make sense.

Nah, it's all good, I'll respond to/see either. The nickname was invented by a guy who couldn't spell, hence the lack of A. It just became a running joke after that.

I agree, it's a little odd and seems like covering their tracks ("Oh, I totally talked with Pazzer, it's right here, see!"). I still lean towards Stuart over Robb for now though, so I think we should focus on him today. I mean, right now most of us are pretty much in agreement about him being a big suspect.

Regardless, I'm convinced. I suppose it's up to the rest of the guests to decide at this point if they agree.

One more thing. Rob's and stuart's votes are lot different than rest of votes on pazzer. They came after Joe's revlation that pazzer is lying and any scum could expect he will get lynched so they jumped on him to get town points.

@Joe; Do you know that Robbeasy is not named Robert Beasy? I asked him some time ago. ;-)

Nope - it had nothing to do with what Joe said - I knew Pazzer was lying as soon as I saw his post on his supposed 'actions' - # 876.
I still think your attack based on Pazzer interaction / non interaction is weak in the extreme, my friend.

@itai -nearly every post you do comes across to me as scum at the moment, yet you had that one single post that is stopping me - the one where you proclaimed you definitely DIDNT want Muttly lynched, like you had some prior info on him (I'm too lazy to ferret the exact post number out, sorry!). With all the power roles flying around I'm guessing you knew he was a cop somehow, but since that time a lot of what you are saying just doesnt make any sense. You're making connections all over the place, throwing out stuff all over the place - much like the way I sometimes play..;o)

@Joe - the Robbeasy name comes from when i was heavily into Thief..;o) I AM called Rob, however. Also like a pig in shit now Thief is here on GOG..;o))

I find funny that you see every remaining player other than you and muttly as scum, which shows you have lot of suspects, yet you haven't participated on any lynch wagon of this game (muttly wagon included as he would be likely lynched if he hadn't claimed cop). Maybe not exactly scummy but interesting nonetheless.

Is that aimed at me ? Erm, I've hammered both lynches....

And - I do not see every other player as scum at all - I have you as town, for a start. My only scum suspects at moment are really Twilight, Stuart, and Itai.

Votecount:

3 - Stuart9001 (Joesapphire, Peanutbrittle, Robbeasy)
1 - Robbeasy (Stuart)

Not voting: Muttly, Itai.sharim, Vitek, Twilightbard

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline is 8pm 20 Feb.

At itai.sharim.

Well, I would have participated on Baron's lynch hadn't Rob stole hammer. And, as Pazzer lynch goes, I was not around when it happened.

@Penut - I've said it before, the only thing that leads me to you is process of elimination. I see Rob, Joe and TB very connected. So, if he flips mafia - my guess would be that either Joe or TB are mafia as well.

As lynching Rob goes, if he flips town that it clears both Joe and TB (at least for me) leaving me with two easy choices for next lynch (with a bit of help from Joe's investigation). On the other hand, if he flips mafia it leaves a bit of a guess work to pin the last member but we have enough town members for this.

I suppose I understand Stuart's unwillingness to post. Most of our argument's against him are "we've evidence to suppose that most players are town, which leaves stuart as mafia."
I agree there's not really anything to argue about there. Well I suppose you could try and find reasons why those we think are town are actually mafia, (ah but you wouldn't want to do that if you might accidentally give away something about your buddy-in-crime. eh?)

Mt. Sharim's "trust no-one" approach is actually a fairly town way of thinking. Mindgames's right though that he did seem to have some information on muttly13.

((I have been told and told again that "Beasy" is no name for a gentleman of Mindgames' stature but will I listen? Robert Beasy just has too nice a ring to it.))

(( I thought maybe you were talking about the member of our mafia community, before I remembered that she spelled her name "Thiev". I surmise that Thief is a game.))

Considering that Thief 1 and 2 were both recent releases... :P

Well, I want to say that you lean town, yeah, the shouting match wasn't fun, but overall I'm starting to think you lean town, but that's mostly a gut feeling.

My opinion on Stuart? I found his overreaction, bothersome. It reminded me of his action when all eyes were on him on Day 1. I sorta get the feeling that he's very interested in pushing away the attention as fast as possible, sort of like he had something to hide. I can't really make a big case on him, but I definitely feel like his actions are very suspicious.