Posted January 08, 2012
JoeSapphire
Consultant Liar
JoeSapphire Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Vitek
Master of Karate and friendship for everyone
Vitek Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From British Indian Ocean Territory
JoeSapphire
Consultant Liar
JoeSapphire Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted January 08, 2012
nah it's not really anything. Just thought it was a bit strange to start trying to make yourself look less scumful from the murder,
but I suppose all you said was that you two weren't in corroboration in the game which is pretty certain. I guess.
So why did you vote for NMillar when Zchinque did and vote for whoever it was that other time? Tell us again?
but I suppose all you said was that you two weren't in corroboration in the game which is pretty certain. I guess.
So why did you vote for NMillar when Zchinque did and vote for whoever it was that other time? Tell us again?
Red_Baron
Best Rant Ever!
Red_Baron Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2009
From Denmark
Posted January 08, 2012
Well, it might be simply because Vitek agreed with his targets, but its true that we didn't really receive much explanation from either of them.
Now to an open ramble - or chain of thought - However you like to see it:
I gotta say that with Crazybear being so absent, I think that we got lucky with him only being vanilla. If a town is lynched for lurking, I prefer that one. But then we lost doc as well, hmm I don't really see how they could point him out.. so as Vitek said, maybe someone just feared him? Or was its his manner of playstyle that made him a good target. Going to re-read what he wrote to see if I'll see something else - as my focus in many of his posts has been on the advice/recommendations, instead of what he wrote in regards of his suspects and targets. Actually I only recall him pointing at nmillar and stuart, correct me if I am wrong?
Stuart was close to a lynch and one of my targets as well, judging from reactions to vote. But there seems to be something against Orryrro as well, though I am unsure what that case is - if anyone of those targeting him could explain?
Now to an open ramble - or chain of thought - However you like to see it:
I gotta say that with Crazybear being so absent, I think that we got lucky with him only being vanilla. If a town is lynched for lurking, I prefer that one. But then we lost doc as well, hmm I don't really see how they could point him out.. so as Vitek said, maybe someone just feared him? Or was its his manner of playstyle that made him a good target. Going to re-read what he wrote to see if I'll see something else - as my focus in many of his posts has been on the advice/recommendations, instead of what he wrote in regards of his suspects and targets. Actually I only recall him pointing at nmillar and stuart, correct me if I am wrong?
Stuart was close to a lynch and one of my targets as well, judging from reactions to vote. But there seems to be something against Orryrro as well, though I am unsure what that case is - if anyone of those targeting him could explain?
sdf1234
New User
sdf1234 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From Colombia
Posted January 08, 2012
I'd go with the fear theory, this idea was stated several times at day 1. I'm really sad it had come to this - it actually means Z cannot play with us. He is always the first target for NK, and if he is not, he is probably mafia...
Anyhow, back to the game. The case about Orryrro was that although he was posting, he did not post anything relevant to the game. This idea is presented by the now deceased Zchinque at post #360.
Anyhow, back to the game. The case about Orryrro was that although he was posting, he did not post anything relevant to the game. This idea is presented by the now deceased Zchinque at post #360.
sdf1234
New User
sdf1234 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From Colombia
Posted January 08, 2012
And if no one has anything to add, vote stuart9001.
Red_Baron
Best Rant Ever!
Red_Baron Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2009
From Denmark
Vitek
Master of Karate and friendship for everyone
Vitek Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From British Indian Ocean Territory
Posted January 08, 2012
JoeSapphire: nah it's not really anything. Just thought it was a bit strange to start trying to make yourself look less scumful from the murder,
but I suppose all you said was that you two weren't in corroboration in the game which is pretty certain. I guess.
So why did you vote for NMillar when Zchinque did and vote for whoever it was that other time? Tell us again?
I just pointed out that our supposed ploy is moot now. But yes, you can say I did it to look less scummy. It was one of stuart's main accusation against me, afterall. but I suppose all you said was that you two weren't in corroboration in the game which is pretty certain. I guess.
So why did you vote for NMillar when Zchinque did and vote for whoever it was that other time? Tell us again?
As I said I voted nmillar together with Zchinque because I wanted to see what he is trying to do and nmillar never aknowledges one vote.
I voted stuart becuase of his contradiction which Zchinque pointed out and I wanted him to respond and his response gave me no reason to unvote.
Red_Baron: I gotta say that with Crazybear being so absent, I think that we got lucky with him only being vanilla. If a town is lynched for lurking, I prefer that one. But then we lost doc as well, hmm I don't really see how they could point him out.. so as Vitek said, maybe someone just feared him? Or was its his manner of playstyle that made him a good target. Going to re-read what he wrote to see if I'll see something else - as my focus in many of his posts has been on the advice/recommendations, instead of what he wrote in regards of his suspects and targets. Actually I only recall him pointing at nmillar and stuart, correct me if I am wrong?
It quite surprised me and I think it had to be because they feared him not because his playstyle because some people mentioned his style confuses them and makes scumhunting harder which is something that mafia should encourage.muttly13
I must break you
muttly13 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Aug 2011
From United States
Posted January 08, 2012
So no one sees the Z kill as simply a mafia way to get Stuart lynched easily on D2? Mafia watches as we lynch a town lurker, then decides to kill the man who started the train on Stuart to make it seem he was taking his "revenge".
Think about how Stuart has played. He came right out of the gate talking. How many new players given a mafia role would do that? Any? Then when the wagon has formed he simply checks out, barley defending himself. How is that a scum tell? If anything it should read as a new townie getting frustrated at the seeming injustice of it. Too me he has played about as town as you can in this game without realizing it.
Could it be some master plan to read out as town? I guess, but thats some plan and since Crazy flipped town he had a pretty risky way of getting things started if CrazyBear turned out to not be a hothead.
So I ask you to consider that this is at least a possibility. And if you can make that step, who then comes right back and votes Stuart after it was pretty much universally agreed that the contradiction evidence against him was weak and he was only "our best bet for day 1 and a deadline?" And who revoted him within HOURS of hammering a confirmed townie and D2s start after stating, and I quote,
"So even though is a terribly flimsy choice, I blame the holidays due to lack of time for discussions and evidence gathering. Lets hope this lynch and night brings new info of interest. "
How does voting hours after the NK for the easiest train out there without adding an iota of new thought to the case count as "hoping for new info"? One would have assumed you would use new info for new thoughts, or at least allowed new info to present itself.
I believe the mafia made a major misstep in trying to push Stuart back so rapidly. If nothing else, Stuart can even be used as a backup lynch since there is clearly so much support aligned against him. What is the point of piling on him again so quickly?
I would love to hear explanation for any of this Red_Baron...
Think about how Stuart has played. He came right out of the gate talking. How many new players given a mafia role would do that? Any? Then when the wagon has formed he simply checks out, barley defending himself. How is that a scum tell? If anything it should read as a new townie getting frustrated at the seeming injustice of it. Too me he has played about as town as you can in this game without realizing it.
Could it be some master plan to read out as town? I guess, but thats some plan and since Crazy flipped town he had a pretty risky way of getting things started if CrazyBear turned out to not be a hothead.
So I ask you to consider that this is at least a possibility. And if you can make that step, who then comes right back and votes Stuart after it was pretty much universally agreed that the contradiction evidence against him was weak and he was only "our best bet for day 1 and a deadline?" And who revoted him within HOURS of hammering a confirmed townie and D2s start after stating, and I quote,
"So even though is a terribly flimsy choice, I blame the holidays due to lack of time for discussions and evidence gathering. Lets hope this lynch and night brings new info of interest. "
How does voting hours after the NK for the easiest train out there without adding an iota of new thought to the case count as "hoping for new info"? One would have assumed you would use new info for new thoughts, or at least allowed new info to present itself.
I believe the mafia made a major misstep in trying to push Stuart back so rapidly. If nothing else, Stuart can even be used as a backup lynch since there is clearly so much support aligned against him. What is the point of piling on him again so quickly?
I would love to hear explanation for any of this Red_Baron...
nmillar
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
nmillar Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted January 08, 2012
Vitek: As I said I voted nmillar together with Zchinque because I wanted to see what he is trying to do and nmillar never aknowledges one vote.
This has been mentioned a few times now. The reason I didn't acknowledge either vote was because I assumed it was a ploy to draw mafia on to a quick lynch. If it had been successful, then mafia members would have been easily identifiable if I had been lynched - i.e. three of the six following Zchinque on the bandwagon. Yes, I'm fully aware that I'm assuming there are 3 mafia members once again, but I think we've established that's the norm in pretty much every game now.
sdf1234
New User
sdf1234 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From Colombia
Posted January 09, 2012
I am still not sure how the lynch of Crazybear came to be but here are a few things I noticed:
1. Stuart reaches L-1 and then Vitek unvotes (post #363).
2. JoeSapphire throws Crazybear's absence into the air (post #368).
3. muttly13 again mentions Crazybear's absence (post #377).
This time it sticks, and PenutBrittle is the first to bite and from post #383 the whole wagon starts to roll.
One note of interest - muttly13 never jumps on the wagon. I was expecting muttly13 to at least support a lynch he himself started.
@muttly13 - Why do you say he was a confirmed townie? (Or do you mean he is now?)
Another thing I find interesting is Zchinque not protecting himself. I find it hard to believe a doctor would protect someone else instead of protecting a confirmed power role.
1. Stuart reaches L-1 and then Vitek unvotes (post #363).
2. JoeSapphire throws Crazybear's absence into the air (post #368).
3. muttly13 again mentions Crazybear's absence (post #377).
This time it sticks, and PenutBrittle is the first to bite and from post #383 the whole wagon starts to roll.
One note of interest - muttly13 never jumps on the wagon. I was expecting muttly13 to at least support a lynch he himself started.
@muttly13 - Why do you say he was a confirmed townie? (Or do you mean he is now?)
Another thing I find interesting is Zchinque not protecting himself. I find it hard to believe a doctor would protect someone else instead of protecting a confirmed power role.
Vitek
Master of Karate and friendship for everyone
Vitek Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From British Indian Ocean Territory
Posted January 09, 2012
nmillar: This has been mentioned a few times now. The reason I didn't acknowledge either vote was because I assumed it was a ploy to draw mafia on to a quick lynch. If it had been successful, then mafia members would have been easily identifiable if I had been lynched - i.e. three of the six following Zchinque on the bandwagon.
You almost never acknowledge vote. ;-) muttly13: So no one sees the Z kill as simply a mafia way to get Stuart lynched easily on D2? Mafia watches as we lynch a town lurker, then decides to kill the man who started the train on Stuart to make it seem he was taking his "revenge".
Think about how Stuart has played. He came right out of the gate talking. How many new players given a mafia role would do that? Any? Then when the wagon has formed he simply checks out, barley defending himself. How is that a scum tell? If anything it should read as a new townie getting frustrated at the seeming injustice of it. Too me he has played about as town as you can in this game without realizing it.
Could it be some master plan to read out as town? I guess, but thats some plan and since Crazy flipped town he had a pretty risky way of getting things started if CrazyBear turned out to not be a hothead.
So I ask you to consider that this is at least a possibility. And if you can make that step, who then comes right back and votes Stuart after it was pretty much universally agreed that the contradiction evidence against him was weak and he was only "our best bet for day 1 and a deadline?" And who revoted him within HOURS of hammering a confirmed townie and D2s start after stating, and I quote,
"So even though is a terribly flimsy choice, I blame the holidays due to lack of time for discussions and evidence gathering. Lets hope this lynch and night brings new info of interest. "
How does voting hours after the NK for the easiest train out there without adding an iota of new thought to the case count as "hoping for new info"? One would have assumed you would use new info for new thoughts, or at least allowed new info to present itself.
I believe the mafia made a major misstep in trying to push Stuart back so rapidly. If nothing else, Stuart can even be used as a backup lynch since there is clearly so much support aligned against him. What is the point of piling on him again so quickly?
I would love to hear explanation for any of this Red_Baron...
Wow, this seems like biiig overreaction. I agree the votes started piling unecessary quickly but you defend stuart a bit too much. Think about how Stuart has played. He came right out of the gate talking. How many new players given a mafia role would do that? Any? Then when the wagon has formed he simply checks out, barley defending himself. How is that a scum tell? If anything it should read as a new townie getting frustrated at the seeming injustice of it. Too me he has played about as town as you can in this game without realizing it.
Could it be some master plan to read out as town? I guess, but thats some plan and since Crazy flipped town he had a pretty risky way of getting things started if CrazyBear turned out to not be a hothead.
So I ask you to consider that this is at least a possibility. And if you can make that step, who then comes right back and votes Stuart after it was pretty much universally agreed that the contradiction evidence against him was weak and he was only "our best bet for day 1 and a deadline?" And who revoted him within HOURS of hammering a confirmed townie and D2s start after stating, and I quote,
"So even though is a terribly flimsy choice, I blame the holidays due to lack of time for discussions and evidence gathering. Lets hope this lynch and night brings new info of interest. "
How does voting hours after the NK for the easiest train out there without adding an iota of new thought to the case count as "hoping for new info"? One would have assumed you would use new info for new thoughts, or at least allowed new info to present itself.
I believe the mafia made a major misstep in trying to push Stuart back so rapidly. If nothing else, Stuart can even be used as a backup lynch since there is clearly so much support aligned against him. What is the point of piling on him again so quickly?
I would love to hear explanation for any of this Red_Baron...
Interesting thing is, almost each time someone is NK'ed on this site and he suspected someone it confirms the person more than it cast suspicon on him/her. I think sometimes we are WIFOMing too much.
itai.sharim: Another thing I find interesting is Zchinque not protecting himself. I find it hard to believe a doctor would protect someone else instead of protecting a confirmed power role.
Seriously? Docotrs can't protect themselves. It's main part of their role!nmillar
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
nmillar Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
muttly13
I must break you
muttly13 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Aug 2011
From United States
Posted January 09, 2012
I am excited to have found what feels like the first solid scum-tell of the game. And I mention Stuart is easily lynchable with all the support on it from day one, hardly a strong defense. In fact, its a basic tenant of my argument that Baron went right after the most likely and easiest d2 target.
stuart9001
Advertise here!
stuart9001 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted January 09, 2012
I was going to start by voicing my opinion that I have been framed by the scum, but muttly has beat me to it.
I have to add though that I found this strangely prophetic.
@ Vitek: I agree that my post which contained a vote was indeed a mess, my point about it being ignored was not directed at the mod it was at the other people playing, none of whom seemed to have noticed it.
I have to add though that I found this strangely prophetic.
Red_Baron: And yes Zchinque, I know that your back to your old scheme of telling how to play instead of playing - like it as way to post without actually saying anything. But heck I don't really care, since I disagree. It does give us info, it tells us about one player. If by some stroke of luck he is scum, then we got lucky. If he is town, then we have a higher chance of hitting the right target next time. And we avoid a no lynch, although the night-kill might kill one of us as well. Thats the chance one takes in a mafia game.
My emphasis. @ Vitek: I agree that my post which contained a vote was indeed a mess, my point about it being ignored was not directed at the mod it was at the other people playing, none of whom seemed to have noticed it.