UK_John: When I started this thread I never realized how many pluses would be given to posts and how few negatives (although even in this thread there are examples of minuses that prove why we should not have it - which is proof if ever their were proof of needed change, given the subject of this thread in particular :) !!). This tells me that most of us are very sensible and it is the minority that doesn't 'get it'. Such is life in general, I suppose.
In any event, overall, one thing you can say about the message rep system, and that is when you see lots of minuses and pluses at the right of practically every message, you know a lively debate is taking place! So like with most bad things like this message rep system, there is always a silver lining. Problem is, is there a way to widen that silver lining so the whole thing is silver?
First you've got several replies, which means that the debate is lively, you don't need a score to prove that, in fact a score proves absolutely nothing to the tempo of the debate, just scroll down and read.
Second you're now saying that it's OK to put a - score down as those are the people who obviously don't "get it" so are therefore in a minority.
Am I reading this wrong or is this a open and free system where we score your post accordingly with
either a + or - ?
According to you, those who give a - score just don't "get it" and are in some way not playing the game.
I can score whatever I bloody well like and to have someone come along and tell me (if ever anyone knew it was me who left a - score) that I didn't "get it" would have my size ten boot in their face. How dare you!
It is ignorant and arrogant of you to assume that just because someone does not agree with what you say is in some way not understanding.
I really, really, think you've lost your way John and I would suggest that it is
you who just don't "get it" and have become obsessed with this especialy with your new insinuations.