It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Should be out July 19. From what i see it looks ok.
I've very excited. Chris Avellone is the lead writer on this one.
Definitely looking forward to it, they've done a really good job on the DLC, strangely it seems more polished than the main game.
Have the DLCs been good for this game so far? IMO the DLCs for Fallout 3 weren't very good. I haven't purchased the F:NV DLCs mainly because I just couldn't get into the game like I could with F3 but this could give me a reason to go back.
I'm not sure I'll get it. Dead Money was alright but Honest Hearts was incredibly short. I finished it in less than an hour, which is a shame because I loved the setting.
I'm not terribly excited. The last two DLCs were somewhat underwhelming (they had some very cool features but were highly flawed). I'll hold out for the final DLC for now, when we finally get to meet Ulysses.
I hope this is the last one so they'll finally release a goty edition.
Cant wait for this. I really enjoy fallout new vegas a lot more than fallout 3 and more dlc is a good thing.
DLC tends to be terrible value for money and doesn't usually add much to a game.

Damn you Bethesda for creating this blight upon the gaming industry.
I haven't played Honest Hearts yet. Was too busy with The Witcher 2 and now other games. Probably for the best anyway, I think I will start a new character for the rest of the DLC.

Was Honest Hearts better than Dead Money? I thought Dead Money was alright, not great.
avatar
zomgieee: DLC tends to be terrible value for money and doesn't usually add much to a game.

Damn you Bethesda for creating this blight upon the gaming industry.
Microsoft was responsible for the 360's DLC capability; Bethesda just happened to be the first to make use of it. While Oblivion's popularity made the concept of DLC quickly successful this would have happened either way since Microsoft was determined to push this idea.
avatar
zomgieee: DLC tends to be terrible value for money and doesn't usually add much to a game.
That completely depends on the DLC, they vary in quality and value the same as full games do, or expansion packs do.

There's no more reason to hate DLC in general than there is to hate expansion packs in general. You should hate bad DLC, or DLC that is a poor value, but that is not something all DLC qualifies as.

Examples of good DLC:
Fallout 3 - Point Lookout, The Pitt, Broken Steel
Mass Effect 2 - Lair of the Shadowbroker, Project Overlord
BioShock 2 - Minerva's Den
Dragon Age - Liliana's Song
ARMA 2 - Mission packs
Grand Theft Auto IV - Ballad of Gay Tony, Lost and Damned

And more.
Point Lookout was the best DLC I've ever played.
I wouldn't call Broken Steel good. Adding the 20 to 30 levels kinda broke the game balance, the little that it had. And partly the purpose of the DLC was to fix the retarded ending of the original.
avatar
Aningan: I wouldn't call Broken Steel good. Adding the 20 to 30 levels kinda broke the game balance, the little that it had. And partly the purpose of the DLC was to fix the retarded ending of the original.
Also it was too combat focused. Still, I enjoyed it for some of the quests and the way it changes the world. Also it was quite long and meaty and well worth $10.