htown1980: The difference between funding a kickstarter project and contracting with someone to build a house is simple. Kickstarter is an investment in something that may or may not happen, with conditions and risks – a reasonable investor would be aware of and bear some risk. A contract to build a house is a contract for the provision of goods and services.
Kickstarter pledges are not investments - you do not have any chance of a financial return and you gain no ownership of the company or project concerned. What you
do have is an agreement to provide products and services within a certain timescale. That is the situation with a building contract, so I fail to see your argument that the two differ.
htown1980: ...Anyone can quote legislation but the key is finding precedent where that legislation has been applied to a practical analogous situation...Kickstarter's exclusion clauses are unlikely to be found to be in breach of consumer legislation, given the circumstances that Kickstarter will be required to call upon them – in the absence of fraud.
Since fraud is the main concern in this thread (and the only issue I'm seeking to address), I take it that you agree that KS' exclusions would not likely cover them in the case of fraud?
htown1980: ...I am in Court regularly in different jurisdictions (previously in the UK) dealing with commercial and corporate litigation, consumer protection and trade practices disputes...
In which case you should be familiar with how things would play out in the UK - claims under £5,000 (few KS pledges will be anywhere near this) would go on the small claims track and at that level, few companies would consider the costs of defending a claim worthwhile, so claimant gets judgement in default.
So in the case of fraud, UK-based contributors should certainly be able to recover their money (from their credit card issuer - making a claim directly to begin with and using legal action if the claim is rejected) and this would likely apply in other EU countries. Of course, projects can fail in ways that wouldn't qualify for such a refund (delivering an unplayable game due to bugs or bad design) and that is where the risk lies IMHO - even the best developers can turn out a turkey.