Vlad Tepes was a great ruler - he thought the largest empire of the time and won, very few rulers in history can say that. As for the "psycho" part - He lived in the 15 century for fuck's sake, any ruler that wasn't cruel was dead 5 minutes after he got his throne.
morciu: There are these legends that this guy was some sort of medieval batman defending wronged and keeping the land crime free when he was actually just a guy who enjoyed shoving stakes up Turk asses.
keeveek: Yeah, it's funny how much this thing depends on a country. Vlad Tepes is depicted in Polish classrooms as twisted evil son of a bitch with real love for cruelty. Not even a word suggesting he was fighting crime. He impaled people because he enjoyed it. Also, he was a vampire, of course ;P
This is the picture painted in polish schools.
Maybe if you had some rulers like Vlad, your country wouldn't disappear off the map every time someone in Bavaria takes a fart...
BlueMooner: My understanding of Vlad was that he seized the throne, and the people weren't happy with him for that. They kept rising up against him and as soon as he arrived with his army and quashed one uprising, there'd be another one on the other side of his kingdom. So, he had to race over to deal with that, when a third would pop up.
I read that he spent something like 7 years moving around the kingdom nonstop, dealing with all the petty rebellions, never being able to just kick back in his castle and enjoy his position. As a result, he became so frustrated at all these peasants just not getting the fact that he was king now, and so irritated at having to deal with a million flea bites, that he became more and more incensed, and started dishing out harsher and harsher punishments. In that sense, I can understand his reaction.
I don't recall him having any particular problem with rebellions. He's best known for fighting the Ottoman Empire :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_the_Impaler#War_with_the_Ottomans