Delixe: Well the apocalypse in Fallout is based on the science of Fallout which is what science fiction thought in the 1950's.
CymTyr: Right. I get that. I'm just not feeling eloquent enough to describe what I'm feeling regarding Fallout 3. As I said, I love the game, it's just that Fallout: New Vegas seems much more in the spirit of Fallout than F3 was, in my experience.
That was the first thing I said, actually ;) I don't hate F3, I just didn't enjoy it as much as I'm enjoying NV.
As much as I loved Fallout 3, I agree with you on that point: New Vegas is much more of a Fallout game than Fallout 3 was. There is much, much more to do, and the environments and designs better capture the feel of FO1 and FO2. I feel that New Vegas is substantially more open-ended and sandbox-ish, which is what FO2 seemed to be like.
One of the flaws of Fallout 3 is that it wasn't very populated. My best friend, a huge Elder Scrolls fan, had a difficult time enjoying Fallout 3, but fell into New Vegas almost immediately because of the population density.