stoicsentry: Oh, I see. Back to this marxist shit.
Er...what? What does any of this have to do with Marxism?
stoicsentry: Bottom line is that both social justice warriors (TM) and the people you are fighting refuse to treat people respectfully in that way.
There's nothing disrespectful about the word "cisgender". If you were complaining that the term inaccurately described what you are then yes, that would be disrespectful. But, as far as I can tell, that's not what you're doing; you're complaining about a term like this being used of you at all. And that's not on.
stoicsentry: There is at least a 3rd group (if not more) which you do not allow for, apparently, but it nonetheless exists. It includes people that have nothing to do with your fight.
There is nothing neutral about your position here.
stoicsentry: I don't "get" to complain about being labeled something that I don't want to be labeled?
The privileged group doesn't get to decide that the oppressed group gets labelled and they don't.
stoicsentry: Who the hell do social justice warriors (TM) think they are to complain about privilege whilst simultaneously taking upon themselves the enormous privilege of defining words for everyone else, of defining the conflict the way they want and having the audacity to think the rest of us should unquestioningly do as they say? Do you not see how that's an enormous privilege?
You seem to misunderstand what "privileged" means.
stoicsentry: No, **** that. I am not "cis gender," I refuse to call myself that and I do not give you any moral authority to call me that anymore than you have the moral authority to call someone a "tranny" when they do not want to be referred to in that way.
The two are absolutely not equivalent. You might as well liken "heterosexual" to "faggot".