Immoli: ...
Lets not make excuses, they WANT Steam.
Yeah I also have that sneaking suspicion, or perhaps that they
have steam due to some agreement.
P1na: why are you linking to a site of, let's say, dubious legality? I don't think that's a particularly good idea, even more so when you do it wihtout any kind of reasoning or context to it.
lugum: not to mention when you try something their they are forcing you to install some dubious software.
reported as spam.
Yep, alarm bells : fullypcgames.net is a legitimate site apparently (i.e. without the 'top')
cjrgreen: All of the above. Especially the problems with communication and championing in conglomerates. Nothing happens in these companies unless somebody sticks his neck out to make it happen. The usual consequence of sticking your neck out is somebody comes along with an axe. So it doesn't happen.
And not just compatibility issues, but also other issues involving the license holder's reputation. They may not want a game in circulation because it is not consistent (too retro, too buggy, can't support, doesn't mesh with current titles, too inexpensive) with the image they want to project. Whether we amateurs think so or not, the image and reputation projected by a publisher are
extremely important and mean large numbers of dollars or euros or pounds or złotys to them.
Piracy is sometimes a reason but not the main reason. The main reason is the publisher is risk-averse to bad reputation resulting from problems with a retro title or their perceived assocation with a dealer in remaindered games.
Thx! that makes a great deal of sense, even if it is a bit depressing :P Hopefully the more popular that gog becomes, the less of an issue these things will become.