It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Well with games like EU4 its a hell of a lot easier just to integrate the game into steam than to make multiple versions of the same game for different sites.
avatar
s23021536: What possible conceivable reason could a publisher have to not want to publish on GOG? I'm asking this question, based on all the awesome games I want to see on this site. I apologize if this was addressed on the Twitch thing, but my internet was simply to slow :P

Are the communication lines with the relevant people difficult / inefficient / awkward?
Can the process easily deadlock in bureaucratic mumbo jumbo?
Are the powers-to-be concerned concerned about their names next to games that might have significant compatibility issues on modern systems?
Do they underestimate sales figures and reason that it is not worth the effort?

Edit : Ok, perhaps I should add:

They're opposed to gog's drm-free policy?
They're greedy?
Piracy with a P. They are scared of people downloading copies of a game instead of buying, and in doing so the publishers miss out on $$$. That's probably the main reason imho.
avatar
Niggles: Piracy with a P. They are scared of people downloading copies of a game instead of buying, and in doing so the publishers miss out on $$$. That's probably the main reason imho.
Honestly, I think that's become the scapegoat for this industry, the way DRM is, it typically seems to be more aimed at abusing customers than hindering the pirates

Note I'm not saying piracy doesn't happen, anymore I think some of it happens because of DRM
avatar
skynet464: Well with games like EU4 its a hell of a lot easier just to integrate the game into steam than to make multiple versions of the same game for different sites.
But paradox claims the game is DRM-free on Steam, so how could a DRM-free gog built be different?
Plus Linux and Mac builds are going to be much harder than a DRM-free build that pirates created in a couple minutes.

Lets not make excuses, they WANT Steam.
Nobody mentioned mobile phone desease yet?

People who hold licenses on old games probably dream big dreams that their old game will be reborn on mobile phones .... and from what i have seen so far, it certainly doesn't have to be a very good game at all, for millions/billions of dumb shits to lap it up and think it is wonderful on their mobiles.
avatar
hoethoet: I apologize if this was addressed on the Twitch thing,

Fully Pc Games]Fully Pc Games
www.fullytoppcgames.net
why are you linking to a site of, let's say, dubious legality? I don't think that's a particularly good idea, even more so when you do it wihtout any kind of reasoning or context to it.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: It's all about the DRM because, as we are all acutely aware, no DRM has ever been defeated within, say, 12 minutes of a game's release and then posted as a torrent 18 seconds after that.
avatar
tinyE: I remember (and I can't prove) monitoring review sites the night Diablo 3 came out and hearing that cracks were showing up within an hour of release. Again I can't prove that but it made me laugh at the time.
I particularly enjoyed the news of the fellow that hacked through the always-online requirement of Simcity 5... Exposed!
avatar
hoethoet: I apologize if this was addressed on the Twitch thing,

Fully Pc Games]Fully Pc Games
www.fullytoppcgames.net
avatar
P1na: why are you linking to a site of, let's say, dubious legality? I don't think that's a particularly good idea, even more so when you do it wihtout any kind of reasoning or context to it.
not to mention when you try something their they are forcing you to install some dubious software.
reported as spam.
avatar
Immoli: ...
Lets not make excuses, they WANT Steam.
Yeah I also have that sneaking suspicion, or perhaps that they have steam due to some agreement.

avatar
P1na: why are you linking to a site of, let's say, dubious legality? I don't think that's a particularly good idea, even more so when you do it wihtout any kind of reasoning or context to it.
avatar
lugum: not to mention when you try something their they are forcing you to install some dubious software.
reported as spam.
Yep, alarm bells : fullypcgames.net is a legitimate site apparently (i.e. without the 'top')
avatar
cjrgreen: All of the above. Especially the problems with communication and championing in conglomerates. Nothing happens in these companies unless somebody sticks his neck out to make it happen. The usual consequence of sticking your neck out is somebody comes along with an axe. So it doesn't happen.

And not just compatibility issues, but also other issues involving the license holder's reputation. They may not want a game in circulation because it is not consistent (too retro, too buggy, can't support, doesn't mesh with current titles, too inexpensive) with the image they want to project. Whether we amateurs think so or not, the image and reputation projected by a publisher are extremely important and mean large numbers of dollars or euros or pounds or złotys to them.

Piracy is sometimes a reason but not the main reason. The main reason is the publisher is risk-averse to bad reputation resulting from problems with a retro title or their perceived assocation with a dealer in remaindered games.
Thx! that makes a great deal of sense, even if it is a bit depressing :P Hopefully the more popular that gog becomes, the less of an issue these things will become.
Post edited April 23, 2014 by s23021536