OR... youdunit! :O

@TB: I more meant that everyone should take responsibility for their votes. I wouldn't accept "Well it was Flub's idea!" as an excuse from someone else and I would hope no one would accept that from me (not that I intend to make excuses of that sort).

I didn't have time to check posts for prods today so I am giving you time to post until tomorrow in case you crossed the rules.

Vitek*

If Vitek amasses too many asterisks does he have to mod-suicide?

This is more than anyone can bear, but we will persevere.

Ok, on a quick re-read there is a post that does pop out a bit, but I'm not sure if I want to disclose it yet. It does seem like a PR trying to give hints, or I may be reading too much into that post.
Due to that I'd prefer to not point out the specific post, in case the scum haven't made the connection yet.

Damn it, I hate this game. Still no information.

Then why mention it at all? Are you suspicious that someone's trying to sow a falseclaim? If someone's breadcrumbing it's probably best just to sit on that information until it becomes relevent. (And hope that you don't get murdered)

it's not an asterisk it's a picture of a swallow. It just means that Vitek is graceful like a swallow.

Because there's nothing new in this thread. No discussion, no new information, no nothing. It feels as if we are sitting around twiddling our thumbs...

I didn't really think about falseclaiming, though that is a possibility as well. Will have to go over the posts a bit more carefully it seems.

And why didn't you think about falseclaiming? What position might you be in that gives you the benefit of questioning-somebodies-role without suspecting-that-they-might-be-mafia?

Where did Pazzer keep those biscuits?

Right. To start off with, unvote. From the reactions of others, "your playstyle bloody annoys me" should be considered insufficient evidence for a vote, and... Well, I suppose I've got to consider the fact that if Flub flipped town, I'd be the one being lynched the next day as well. :)

I keep coming back to TwisterBE's post #449 - something about it really doesn't seem to match up with the rest of the game. I suppose given post #323 it could be more of a re-interpretation but... Oh, I don't know what I'm on about. Blast it, did no-one think to investigate this man during the night, or am I just too daft to notice breadcrumbing these days?

I've noticed I still don't really have any form of read on SPF or Robb. This is worrying, especially as a voice at the back of my head keeps thinking "It's probably Robbeasy!". :P Rerereading will be attempted this evening.

I think you misunderstood me. I didn't mean that he may be lying about his role, I meant that I may be reading too much into what they are saying. As for the position I might be in, I think it would be "not paranoid enough", not sure if that is a good thing or not.

I don't have anything to add at the moment, I just wanted to pop in to say that I'll be re-reading all of day 2's posts tomorrow. From there I'll post a thought or two. Sorry that this post isn't more eloquent or useful, I've been busy today.

Sommehow there's not much new information since yesterday. But we have a deadline again. So probably things will get moving a bit more as the deadline approaches. But for now I have no new insights. And here I thought day one would be a bit easier than day one...

Hello peeps - i is back. Will catch up and hopefully post in a short while with current thoughts