I was just pointing out (At the time with him voting against me, I was at 4 votes, against 3 for him) that it wasn't really useful to vote against me, as it wouldn't break the tie, since I still had a vote left, and it wouldn't necessarily guarantee him being saved from lynching...

But then, I'm pretty sure I'm a lost cause to Robbeasy, CSPVG, and yourself, so I won't bother trying to explain my actions or defend myself to you guys...

C'est la vie, on ne peut plaire à tout le monde.

With immediate effect QuadrAlien is replacing pazzer.

Please give him a warm welcome.

Vote CSPVG

Yo Quad, good to have you back!

Hooray! The either-appropriately-or-ironically named QuadrAlien! Nice to be a full team again. You are appointed with the wonderful task of explaining pazzer to us all.

Flub's reason - I laughed, then I went back and checked and read the first dramatic bit (You might be right, but you're not) then CSP's question, then the claim. I can sort of see how you might be accidentally put into a corner without thinking about it.
Still you should have thought about it.
And then saying "probably under the influence"
I'm not sure, that unsettled me again.

I'm confused, but I think I'm going to end up doing this sooner or later - vote QuadrAlien
Welcome welcome. You also have the difficult task of getting Joe to change his mind - he is notoriously straight-thinking and ditherproof.

There was no messing around, I think from the beginning I'm afraid.

Welcome to the fray, QuadrAlien. You have the honors of entering on spot 3 of the average most suspect list. Though a part of my reasoning falls with the sucessful replacement, the suspicious behavior of your predecessor remains.
The only question is now: do I change back again because the 'statistically least damage' argument is void? Or do I stick to my vote? Hmm. Difficult. I might have to think on that for a while.

@vitek: do votes on pazzer automatically transfer to QuadrAlien? Or do we have to confirm a vote on him before it is valid? (might make a difference, voting-train wise)

Welcome, QuadrAlien.

N0x0ss-Once again, sir, I am confounded. No, you are not a lost cause. Your style of play, at least for this game, strikes me as odd. I must point out that while my vote remains on you, all I'm asking for is a little explanation. Why did you defend Pazzer, and then make as if you had suspected him all along? Why did you vote for me? What is your shoe size? This is all vital stuff.

They do.

I don't want players to confuse me with more voting. :-)

Fine, I'll Play your game.

Easier answer first, My Shoe Size is 39 (European). Seeing as how I'm 5'6 Inch , I have small feet and I am a little person.

Why did I defend Pazzer and seemingly reverted back to thinking he is mafia ?

I've been suspecting Pazzer of being Mafia since the post where he proposed we vote no-lynch.
His contributions had been little to non-existant, and the fact that was nearly inactive only made my suspicions grow.
As I stated previously, I don't always like to tell to people I suspect them, as I prefer to catch them of guard instead of alerting them of their suspicious behavior. I tried forcing Pazzer to react and give me something to work on my asking him what he thought about me.

When he said he needed replacement, suddenly things became clearer. He may have been town all along but didn't have time to participate. It did explain why he was practically inactive... furthermore, the way he suddenly decided to quit without trying to leave an impact on the game as a Mafia was very Townish.

Then he came back and blabbered, so I figured, I might as well pressure him into giving us more info or provoke him, before he leaves and another player replaces him and his secrets... Furthermore, the more I thought about it, the more the thought that he might have been mafia all along, coming up with a sudden excuse of having to quit without giving more details to cover his past lurking abilities and try to push the heat away from him made sense.


So this was my train of thoughts... No massive trickery, no wicked plans.. just plain old confused brain of mine very indecisive.


As for why you're my preferred suspect, and why I voted for you when I said I wouldn't vote unless I was convinced ?
I recently asked to Vitek if it was possible for me to leave a message already written in his possession; a message that he would deliver to every player once I am lynched/Killed.
He told me that even if the message was already written before my death, such demand can't be fulfilled.
Seeing as how I may get lynched any moment now, and seeing as how you are my number one suspect; even if un-convinced by your malicious intent, I want it to be clear before my death that you were my number one suspect.
So in fear of somebody missing this, I chose to vote against you, so it can be engraved eternaly and clearly on the pages (one of the pages at least) of this mafia game.

As to why you are my suspect number 1 ? So many reasons... The first one being that you've brought up, or at least contributed largely to the Alien/Townie conversation.

Truth be told, I'm getting more and more suspicious of TwisterBE. I didn't say anything because it would be dismissed as "You're suspicious of him because he voted against you, or because he's the 2nd on the list, and you want to survive", and I thought that I'd at least be taken half seriously if pointing my fingers at you.

Why am I more demotivated now then previously ?
A simple message from one of you has managed to break my moral...
I'm a very suceptible and sensible fellow apparently.

JoeSapphire
"But lynching N0x wouldn't make me too unhappy. I would be unhappy to lynch Mr Twister, but I've been proven wrong before to my great shame - it could happen again"

Why would you care what JoeSapphire thinks of you ? You say
He might be mafia ? You even said so yourself ? You ask
Well I'm not sure... and the Idea of him preferring to sacrifice me over MrTwister, if Joe is townie, I take as a personal defeat.


There you have it all. Anymore questions ?

Currently running around a bit. I'm going to Unvote Quad for a simple reason. It's Day 1, and all of the suspicion is on odd posts of Pazzer. I'm going to keep watching, but I'd like to see what Quad himself has to say before I throw my vote down.

Joe struck me as odd with his vote, as I thought he would be under the same thought process there. Since, Quad can offer only so much about what was going through Pazzer's head, but even that is minimal at this stage, and no more then anyone could come up with about what's going through MY head.

Noxoss' recent post, is kinda strange, and sorta looks like someone who is getting a bit too nervous about having to claim. My own question about the 6 scum thing was also ignored, and I'd like a response. Noxoss, out of the people that have given their list, is there anything that you can gleam from it? What were you hoping for?

I'm mildly curious about what I"might be right"about. Having been married for over half my life, I'm quite clear what it is I'm wrong on.



Only two things, everything I say and everything I do.

*warmly welcomes*


...I hope I did it right...

Please excuse my rudeness QuadrAlien...Welcome!! I look forward to reading your assessment of this thread.

As far as this -----------------> http://www.gog.com/forum/general/extraterrestrials_gog_mafia_16/post266 <----------- is concerned. Well I wonder about someone who claims to provoke in order to illicit a response and who then says their feelings are hurt because of what someone says.

You set yourself up as Agent Provocateur and then get offended at the results?!?! What gives?? I have a hard time believing this on the surface.

I'm not accusing you of lying, I'm just not understanding what the point is of your post.