It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
N0x0ss: Very non-selfish you might say, as I won't vote against TwisterBE just to save myself, I'll vote against someone i'm CONVINCED is mafia.
Personally, I don't think I'll ever be convinced anyone is mafia, 100%. Best I can do is vote for the person who I suspect most is mafia, compromise temporarily to get to an agreement with other players when the deadline approaches, and refuse to vote for people I trust most not to be mafia.
I was rereading the last game and remembered how Twilight fooled me in the beginning. So I went through with fresh eyes to look over his posts.
avatar
pazzer: ..............<snip>......................

Twlight been the voice of reason telling people not to no lynch. Which makes CSPVG's no lynch vote more interesting. Half a cookie.

...............<snip>.................
This is making me uncomfortable.

avatar
TwilightBard: Well, I'm confused. Pazzer has been my biggest read, and with him getting a replacement, I guess I should back off so his replacement.

Other than that, Noxoss seems to be the one who has my interest in two respects. His defense of Pazzer (His explination seems, quite odd to me when pressed), I'm interested in seeing a reaction to the pointed out contridiction. And his answer to his 6 (why 6?) person scumlists. I'm really interesting as to how that will come about.
I'm not liking how Twilight and pazzer seem chummy. Granted Twilight has his vote on pazzer, but I'm just getting an uneasy feeling.

Unvote: TwisterBE

Vote: pazzer
avatar
flubbucket: Unvote: TwisterBE

Vote: pazzer
Well, that just determined my lynching. You may as well go ahead and vote against me to win time.
Why would I do that??
avatar
flubbucket: Why would I do that??
Unvoting TwisterBE, just furthered the number of votes between him and I.
He now only has 2 people voting against him and I have 4, wich (If TwisterBE isn't Mafia) would only encourage mafias that haven't voted against me and were studying the trend, to do so, instead of voting against TwisterBE.

I will however adress the people that have been questioning my behavior so far.
(Just need time reading everything and studying HOW exactly I want to answer.)
Howza 'bout studying exactly HOW you want to vote???
avatar
TwisterBE: Well it's either me or Noxoss and I ain't picking myself.
So vote Noxoss.
Time to choose.
avatar
N0x0ss: You do realize I didn't vote for anybody yet ...
Well, do as you see fit...
Not quite sure what Twister voting for you has to do with you not having voted. Are you trying to say that people shouldn't find you suspicious because you haven't voted yet?

Megavote N0x0ss!

(Please imagine this musical cue accompanying my vote)
Hm. Lynching Twister seems to have become unlikely. So what to do? Jump on the N0x0ss train? Or switch to Pazzer? Both are suspicious, but I'm not sure about either. So it still is a risk. But I'll stand by my previous reasoning: voting Pazzer does less potential damage because if we don't find replacement he will be taken out of the game anyhow. So even if my suspicion is wrong, we at least avoid a double kill. (but probably he is scum and lynching him will turn out to be justified anyhow. I hope).

Long reasoning short:

vote pazzer
avatar
N0x0ss: You do realize I didn't vote for anybody yet ...
Well, do as you see fit...
avatar
SirPrimalform: Not quite sure what Twister voting for you has to do with you not having voted. Are you trying to say that people shouldn't find you suspicious because you haven't voted yet?

Megavote N0x0ss!

(Please imagine this musical cue accompanying my vote)
Why do you twist my words to make me more suspicious ?

Twister is voting against me to SAVE himself, not because he suspects me of being MAFIA.
I won't vote against somebody just for the sake of voting against somebody, or to save myself... I'm not a selfish bastard, and I prefer finding a real mafia rather then just diverting the votes form me ...

Is it too complex for you to undestand or are you trying to always justify every single thing I say as an excuse for trying to pass off as townie ? It's sad really...
avatar
Lifthrasil: Hmm. Given that pazzer is suspicious anyhow (to me at least) and that it seems difficult to find a replacement for him, it might be best if all who find him suspicious agree on him. That way we would avoid a nolynch, which everyone seems to agree to be a bad thing. Also, if he turns out to be scum everything is fine. If he should be town that would be sad of course. But then again if vitek doesn't find replacement and Pazzer can't post regularly, he will be modkilled anyhow, so we will loose him plus whoever is lynched (if someone else gets a majority vote). Also waiting for pazzers replacement doesn't seem to make sense to me, because whoever takes over will still play the same role. Either the role is scum or town. That will not change. So IF we come to the conclusion that he is likely scum, waiting for his replacement (and thereby giving his role more time to do damage) would only hurt the town.

Does this all make sense? Or did I make some logic-error somewhere. If so, please point it out. (especially Pazzer might have something to say to this, I guess)
The logic-error is, of course, that YOU might be mafia and so we shouldn't trust you at all.
But, having said that, I like this post. It comes across as genuine and there's a sense of forgot-the-possibility-that-self-could-be-mafia which appeals to my trust.

avatar
flubbucket: I'm not liking how Twilight and pazzer seem chummy. Granted Twilight has his vote on pazzer, but I'm just getting an uneasy feeling.

Unvote: TwisterBE

Vote: pazzer
Dang! Now I have to go and re-think everything.

Could you explain again, Mr Bucket, why you decided to claim Human so early on in the game?
bah. hm.
To be quite honest and vulnerable for a brief moment, it was sort of a "crime of passion" if you will. If you read the post it is an uncharacteristic outburst.


We now return to our regularly scheduled programming.
avatar
N0x0ss: <Snippity>
Would you care to anwser the questions/accusations in post 193?

avatar
flubbucket: To be quite honest and vulnerable for a brief moment, it was sort of a "crime of passion" if you will. If you read the post it is an uncharacteristic outburst.


We now return to our regularly scheduled programming.
Did I goad you into that, or were you just feeling cantankerous?
It was most likely fueled by alcohol and a feeble attempt to be clever.
Woah!

Back after a hectic weekend away (camping turned out longer than i thought!)

Having had a catch up, I see nothing to make me budge from my vote of n0x0ss
avatar
N0x0ss: Why do you twist my words to make me more suspicious ?
Putting forward a possible interpretation of your words as a question, addressed to you isn't twisting words. I was asking what you meant and why you said it. If I'd said "N0x0ss said 'blah blah blah'" to someone else I could have been twisting your words, but surely not when I'm asking you for clarification.

Why are you twisting my words?

avatar
N0x0ss: Twister is voting against me to SAVE himself, not because he suspects me of being MAFIA.
I won't vote against somebody just for the sake of voting against somebody, or to save myself... I'm not a selfish bastard, and I prefer finding a real mafia rather then just diverting the votes form me ...
He's voting for you because there were only two viable bandwagons and one of them was him. Now he's still jumping on a bandwagon with not much stated reason other than that and I'm sure we've all noted that.
However, I'm also interested by the fact that you felt it worth mentioning that you hadn't voted yet. That in itself seems like an attempt to make Twister seem scummier and paint yourself as some kind of saint. :P

avatar
N0x0ss: Is it too complex for you to undestand or are you trying to always justify every single thing I say as an excuse for trying to pass off as townie ? It's sad really...
I... what?