It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Elmofongo: Amazing that this game gets all the controversy while these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZWDw3OqHx4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt4mzNEOXvI
Passed by almost unnoticed.
This is a bit off-subject though. We're not discussing what games should be considered erotic material or whatever, we're discussing why Steam would ban a specific game.
Considering neither of the games you cited are on Steam AFAIK, they really don't add anything to the discussion.
avatar
Mnemon: Couldn't they have just simply banned it from greenlight for being an awful game, 'controversial' content or not? I mean, basically, it's a card game simulator with absolutely horrible dialogue thrown in - 80s porn flick minus the corniness by all appearances.
that's even worse than banning it for it's content. "Awful" is a pretty objective indicator. They would have to stop selling the painkiller sequels to, since those get bad reviews to and so must be awful ...
avatar
Mnemon: Couldn't they have just simply banned it from greenlight for being an awful game, 'controversial' content or not? I mean, basically, it's a card game simulator with absolutely horrible dialogue thrown in - 80s porn flick minus the corniness by all appearances.
You can't really ban anything because of it being "awful" as there is no clear cut indicator of what is awful. It's a subjective matter. Something awful to you may be awesome to other, no?
It's the same old stupid censorship in games that we're used to. Games are still seen as "toys" for kids, even after all these years.

Australia, for example, finally got a M18 rating for games, after so many years with games being refused classification. Ninja Gaiden 3 Sword's Edge is the first 18 rated game in Australia.

Still, i don't think that this case here is that bad. Valve can accept or refuse anything they want, it's their store. What i can't accept is when a game gets banned by the government for some stupid reason.

One of the cases that pissed me off the most was Manhunt 2. I still fail to see why the uncensored version of that game was banned in most countries in EU, while extremely brutal movies like Saw are completely fine. I just can't fucking get it. The violence in Manhunt is far from feeling as real as the one in Saw, yet Saw is fine, Manhunt isn't. I think that the main issue is that games are still seen as products aimed only at kids.
I think GOG should get True Love and Knights of Xentar, btw. Edit: Oh, and the original Lula. I actually liked the porn movie tycoon bit...
Post edited January 11, 2013 by Zeewolf
While it would be nice for them to sell these more adult games, but at the same time Steam is basically the Wallmart of gaming. I don't mean this in a demeaning way either, what I mean by the "Wallmart of gaming" is that they are the mainstream seller of games at low prices and everybody buys from them.

You aren't going to see a porn section at Wallmart and for Wallmart to sell porn would cause a freaking uproar. And yet, they get away with it to a certain extent by selling unrated movies. Unfortunately, the core of the problem is that games are games. And when people think of playing games, they associate games with children :(

I think a place like amazon or gamestop to sell "unrated" or adult games would be the best bet to get adult games into the mainstream. One amazon has a little more power then Steam since they are not known as being the primary seller of games, so I think they can get away with it more.

Gamestop would also have the advantage of being offline and can manually card people before they can go behind the curtain. There will still be an uproar.
Attachments:
Post edited January 11, 2013 by Thunderstone
Not wanting to derail the thread, but

avatar
StingingVelvet: This actually leads to higher levels of sexual deviance, as teens and shallow adults search for attention through deviancy or experiment endlessly due to a lack of guidance.
Can you define what you mean by "deviancy"? Most of the time when I see the word used it's as a really vague term for pseudo-moralizations.

The negative consequences I see for sexuality being prevalent in media yet not being acknowledged are things like teen pregnancies and unprotected sex, but those are cases of irresponsibility rather than "deviance".
avatar
Aaron86: Can you define what you mean by "deviancy"? Most of the time when I see the word used it's as a really vague term for pseudo-moralizations.
Deviancy means against social norms.
avatar
Aaron86: Not wanting to derail the thread, but

avatar
StingingVelvet: This actually leads to higher levels of sexual deviance, as teens and shallow adults search for attention through deviancy or experiment endlessly due to a lack of guidance.
avatar
Aaron86: Can you define what you mean by "deviancy"? Most of the time when I see the word used it's as a really vague term for pseudo-moralizations.

The negative consequences I see for sexuality being prevalent in media yet not being acknowledged are things like teen pregnancies and unprotected sex, but those are cases of irresponsibility rather than "deviance".
Ha and people don't see its an epidemic now, I know five girls in my lifetime to have been pregnant at a young age.

2 of my Cousins of both side of my family

A girl I know in my childhood school (mabye even more girls of that school if I am not aware)

And (well she is 18-20 age but still too young) a girl I know in my first college.

And my own Mother which was my sister she carried.

So despite this day and age's more restrictiveness in sexuality in media they still had sex too early.
I forgot all about that game, thanks for reminding me.
avatar
Aaron86: Can you define what you mean by "deviancy"? Most of the time when I see the word used it's as a really vague term for pseudo-moralizations.
avatar
StingingVelvet: Deviancy means against social norms.
You seemed to have been talking about bad kinds of deviancy, so I was wondering what the bad part was.

Surely you're not saying that going against social norms is itself what makes the "deviancies" wrong.
Post edited January 11, 2013 by Aaron86
I remember playing Strip Poker on my Apple IIe, dying to win so I could see those green and black topless babes.

But I do tend to agree that, what with all the violence and sex in movies (and even on tv now), it seems pretty weird that games are still generally frowned upon when it comes to showing anybody naked. After all this time, too many people probably think that games are still just for kids.
avatar
Aaron86: You seemed to have been talking about bad kinds of deviancy, so I was wondering what the bad part was.
Surely you're not saying that going against social norms is itself what makes the "deviancies" wrong.
Deviancy doesn't really have morality. What I meant was when the social norm is repression and condemnation for anything sexual then deviance becomes expected and common, which leads to confusion and repercussions from an actual lack of sexual morality due to the expected morality being unattainable.

Something like that anyway.
avatar
KneeTheCap: I find in incredibly odd that Valve, for instance, is perfectly okay with blood, gore and horrible violence, but then games like Seduce Me (http://www.seducemegame.com/) gets banned from Greenlight. Why?

Average games is what, 30+ years now? Do we still see video games as kid entertainment, where if you see a nipple, run for the hills, burn all copies of video games you can find and sue the makers ?
Lemme explain this as much as I can. I've played the game, so that helps.

First, let's start with what I wrote about the game in the "worst games you've ever played" thread:
And then there's Seduce Me. I got gifted it as a joke, but it's pretty bad. It's a casual game and you can tell it is, but pretty much all of your progress in the game is determined by card games. And the random dealing of the cards regularly puts you in situations where you lose no matter what. It doesn't matter what kind of game it is, it's not fun to watch a decent amount of progress slip away based on being dealt a bad hand.
Second, it shows a lot more than "a nipple." At one point, there was even a screenshot on the homepage that had to be censored (I think it was) due to showing off too much. Given you DO succeed at the game, you're regularly going to be shown full frontal nudity for both sexes. Chances are you WON'T succeed for more than the odd 10 minutes at a time, but it's still got a LOT of nudity.

Third, I agree. It's pretty stupid that they pull games with sex in them for the reason that they "have sex in them," especially when Valve isn't exactly going for a 'family friendly' store, what with regularly advertising M-rated games on their homepage using large banners. Some might even recall that Direct2Drive sold the AO versions of LSL: Magna Cum Laude and Singles (of which I've never played either, so I don't really know how significant that is) or that, at one point, GTA: San Andreas was, indeed, rated AO.

However, here's where the whole "DON'T SELL AO-RATED GAMES ON THE STOREFRONT" thing probably comes from. Most retailers have rules against selling AO-rated games in stores, probably in an effort to keep things family-friendly as you walk through (you can't tell a kid they can't walk past a video game because it's rated M, but you CAN restrict them from accessing it online to a degree). Places like Wal-Mart and Target. It's been that way for a while, and I wouldn't be surprised if it just sort of bled over into Steam's philosophy on things.

avatar
DieRuhe: (and even on tv now)
Hey now. Don't jeopardize the notion of them finishing the Game of Thrones TV show over it having nudity. :P
Post edited January 11, 2013 by johnki
i am not asking for censorship, lets be honest sex is part of life and why not explore it in games. Hell knows in this country, we need to relax about it.

*I do have 1 exception - correct me if i am wrong, but a few years ago, there was a game about rape - i cannot understand any justification for that in a game.

I am not surprised by Valve, but instead of censorship perhaps make a mature area ?