Nel-A: haha good post, but honestly, it wasn't that long ago that we could have said all of that for Chelsea!! So who knows if they can stay up, become established what they could do. If they have decent money behind them, then there's nothing stopping them from pushing on.
Delixe: The difference between QPR and Man City and Chelsea is the latter two were already big clubs. Man City moved into the City of Manchester stadium giving them a bigger capacity than Plastic Bridge or Shite Hart Lane all they needed was a sugar daddy to start pumping money in and that's what they got. Sure Chelsea was sold for £1 but Plastic Bridge is the biggest ground in West London and Chelsea were already a top ten Premiership team, again all they needed was that sugar daddy and along came Roman. Loftus Road is to put it mildly a complete shithole that makes Craven Cottage look like Old Trafford. Just looking at it on Sky Sports the other night makes you think of council estates and the 1980's. Unless Hernandes wants to inject serious money and develop a new stadium then there really isn't much he can do to improve the status of QPR.
Well I suppose he could employ cleaners to get the smell of piss out of the away end for a start.
On Man City though, I remember when they were playing in the old 3rd division as a kid. Didn't they get the council to pay for the COMS too? I think they and QPR were similar in terms of size once upon a time, (maybe not support) but Man City got some serious funding and backing, whereas QPR didn't and stagnated for a decade.
Also, not too many arguments about their ground, but truthfully, I don't mind it! It just looks like a proper, old English ground to me! I actually prefer that over the soulless stadia that have been built in recent times,