Posted September 27, 2008
Lanttu
I=B000-B7FF
Lanttu Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Finland
Nudiustertian
DayB4Yesterday
Nudiustertian Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Netherlands
Lanttu
I=B000-B7FF
Lanttu Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Finland
Posted September 27, 2008
Nudiustertian: I have a clearer dislike for forums that allow enormous signature blocks with (animated) images, since it wastes everyone's time just to allow people an ego boost (or something, I have no idea why they still think their signatures are cute the seventeenth time you see them). It invariably becomes a sport to see who can make the biggest, most attention-grabbing signature possible.
Been there. I am regular reader of uk-polos forum and it is pretty good forum, I have to say... However I am still using some picture blacklist plugin to mozilla, so I can blacklist their 300x640px enormous sized sigs... "Yes. You have a Polo. Me too. Now, get it off so I can read the forum." Sometimes thread with 8 short messages grows to several screen size, just because of those sigs. :D
SkullCowboy
E Dravens Mentor
SkullCowboy Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United States
Posted September 27, 2008
I'd have to agree with the nay sayers. Too often a post will consist of three words and 30 'moties. Gets annoying.
Nudiustertian
DayB4Yesterday
Nudiustertian Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Netherlands
Posted September 27, 2008
SkullCowboy: I'd have to agree with the nay sayers. Too often a post will consist of three words and 30 'moties. Gets annoying.
I think this is more a "forum culture" issue rather than one with emoticons per se. Nothing's forcing people to sound like overexcited morons.
I mean, it's not like you can't do the same in a text-based forum, even if it doesn't have the same impact!!!oneoneeleven :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D and now I put on my hat because I'm so quirky >:-) >:-) >:-) >:-) >:-) >:-) >:-) and now I'm taken out and shot *-x
That said, it does seem to be the case that any forum with *animated* emoticons will eventually grow a culture of people who will post entire pages full of dancing smileys as a way of saying "me, too".
Snowcrashed.386
................
Snowcrashed.386 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted September 27, 2008
I can't stand emoticons myself. It is rather distracting having an annoying bright yellow ball right in the middle of a sentence.
Ois
Mr. Eucalypt
Ois Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Australia
Posted September 27, 2008
Keep it text.
(And no sigs while we are at it, unless you can keep them to a single line, reduced font size.)
Do we really want silly grinning (animated!) faces? I mean *really*?
(And no sigs while we are at it, unless you can keep them to a single line, reduced font size.)
Do we really want silly grinning (animated!) faces? I mean *really*?
Shadowcat
One of Many
Shadowcat Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From New Zealand
Posted September 28, 2008
Another vote for no emoticons, and also for never ever letting people have a signature with an image in it. Both those things are quite obnoxious.