Posted February 10, 2014
![avatar](/upload/avatars/2011/06/cf47bbb3dfcf34e007cc1b8ef3348c21fa5272b3_t.jpg)
I wanted an e-reader to read technical books, most of which are offered DRM-free from various vendors (though I totally get why DRM would be a huge block if you mostly get non-technical books).
However, I wanted a ~10 inches screen and pretty much all vendors from North American offer 7 inches or less (because that's where most of the market is and screw you if you don't follow the majority).
...
So, I got a tablet and never looked back. Didn't have a problem getting a 10+ incher and the screen is resilient enough to last me years. Not as friendly on the eyes when reading, but a lot less BS to acquire a good device that will last me at least 2 years.
e-reader manufacturers and distributors lost my patronage due to their own ineptitude, not because of DRM.
The problem is that competing paper and tablet products are good enough that manufacturers simply skipped larger ereaders. Sony was coming out with something interesting in Japan that had a flexible display, but since they're getting out of ereaders who knows what that will come to. There's also been advances in LCDs to reduce eyestrain, but those are years away from production.
![avatar](/upload/avatars/2012/07/0442edd5dc369c6fec8f4338916d61a576b98122_t.jpg)
![avatar](/upload/avatars/2011/06/cf47bbb3dfcf34e007cc1b8ef3348c21fa5272b3_t.jpg)
I didn't go to the bottom of it, but from what I gathered from a quick search when I was looking for a ereader, I understood it meant that if you want Amazon books, you needed an Amazon ereader, if you wanted B&N books, you needed their ereader and many of those vendor-specific ereaders didn't have good support for open formats because they didn't want to encourage that (since it competed with their own ebooks).
Collusion of interests is the source of many evils (in this case, them wanting you to buy both their ereaders and their ebooks and tightly coupling both together so that it's hard to buy one without buying the other).
Why do you think I hate Mac so much? Complete collusion of interest, all the way down to the hardware.
Most ereaders can read a generic format, and then are locked into a specific bookstore. EX: Kindles can read regular DRM-free .mobi files, but can only buy books from Amazon's store. The solution to getting an epub file onto a Kindle involves cracking the DRM and converting. This is trivially easy, but does required a basic level of awareness and computer confidence. Adobe's upgrade is apparently designed in response to the trivial ease of cracking their DRM.
The current situation of competing vendor-specific DRM schemes was partially the result of the first Adobe upgrade, where Adobe proved they weren't interested in providing reliable infrastructure for the bookstores. After that, the big players came up with their own DRM schemes.
Adobe is so irrelevant in the US now that I can only see this upgrade reinforcing the lesson to have an in-house DRM solution. Many smaller ebook sellers are already interested in going DRM-free so they don't have to pay Adobe fees and deal with Adobe's bad customer support. This may push some over that edge, but it will also probably drive some out of business as they have to pay for new servers and handle customer complaints.
Libraries, including openlibrary.org which has many books not available elsewhere, are really going to get shafted. They have neither the technical expertise nor the money to deal with this. They may well not even be aware of it. But they're going to be the front line when Gramps has a problem with his ebook checkouts.
Post edited February 10, 2014 by HGiles