It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Dzsono: Yes, you especially, lol :D

My backlog is probably 1/6 the size of yours, but it's full of RPGs, games with high replayability, and games with lots of collectables and secrets (which I despise, but try to complete anyway!).

For your sake, I hope most of your games are short indie titles that can be finished in an afternoon :)
avatar
snowkatt: why me ?!

uhhh not likley
i have yet to start skyrim
i have morrowind somewhere
i have never winter nights 1 and 2
i want to replay kotor
i stil need to bruninate everything in icewind dale 1
i have balders gate 1 and planescape toment

i havet vampire redemption and i want to replay bloodlines

i have that time sink called the sims 2 and oblivion

i have the pc versions of ff 7 and ff 13 ( gods help me )

i have the new shadow gate
several monkey islands
3 broken swords
both syberias
3 saints rows
all 3 batman titles

the megadrive collection which includes at least 5 old school jrpgs

...im totally fucking fucked arent it ?
That's already much more than 1000 hours of gameplay...
Well I have too many games to finish them all in my lifetime, yes, but personally I see that as more a fault with the length of my lifetime, maybe I can work out how to report that to the devs so it can be fixed in Life 2.0...
Nah. 70 games with the 12 free ones, and the one or two gifted ones from time to time (i missed many free games given out here from the moment i joined in), is not a big number. They would be less, but i always try to complete the entire series of a game i like, buy and play. More of a collector rather than an actual player, lol.
avatar
ET3D: It's not exactly that I have too many games as that I play them too little. :)
avatar
Nirth: I think this is a conundrum. No point in owning more games than you have time to play unless owning them is more important than playing them.
That's like saying that there's no point in having more money than you spend. :)

The thought is of course always that you'll play them in the future. It's a lie, of course, but it's a convincing lie. I mean, it certainly convinces me to buy more games. (I also have the excuse of "my kids will play it in the future".)
avatar
snowkatt: why me ?!

uhhh not likley
i have yet to start skyrim
i have morrowind somewhere
i have never winter nights 1 and 2
i want to replay kotor
i stil need to bruninate everything in icewind dale 1
i have balders gate 1 and planescape toment

i havet vampire redemption and i want to replay bloodlines

i have that time sink called the sims 2 and oblivion

i have the pc versions of ff 7 and ff 13 ( gods help me )

i have the new shadow gate
several monkey islands
3 broken swords
both syberias
3 saints rows
all 3 batman titles

the megadrive collection which includes at least 5 old school jrpgs

...im totally fucking fucked arent it ?
avatar
Dzsono: That's already much more than 1000 hours of gameplay...
and thats just what i can remember ^^

i also have all 4 dirt games
several colin mcrae rally games
front mission 3 and 4
ni no kuni
hyper dimension neptunia 2
3 saints rows
la noire
lego hobbit
lego lotr
lego marvel heroes
lego batman 2

and moar !
Ohh, you picked a baaaad time to ask that particular question... ;P
Most certainly. Over 100 on GOG, 200 on Steam, and at least 50 more DRM-free that I need to sort through. A large number of the games I have on GOG are due to bundles and me wanting to play through in order (despite knowing that Ultima 7 is the best, I'm not going to skip over 1-6 to play it; at the very least I'm going to give the early ones a look-in to see how the series progressed).

Exceptions are for the game franchises where the early ones were reportedly done very well, and the sequels were, well, considered pretty naff (Master of Orion 1+2 vs. Master of Orion 3, for example).
avatar
fronzelneekburm: Ohh, you picked a baaaad time to ask that particular question... ;P
Late evening would have been better, yes!
After reading this topic I can only think about this. :P
Post edited December 04, 2014 by Trid
avatar
ET3D: That's like saying that there's no point in having more money than you spend. :)
I definitely don't agree that's an acceptable analogy because of obvious reasons regarding money.

avatar
ET3D: The thought is of course always that you'll play them in the future. It's a lie, of course, but it's a convincing lie. I mean, it certainly convinces me to buy more games. (I also have the excuse of "my kids will play it in the future".)
Exactly and even worse, a convincing lie which means people won't stop even when they ought to. Personally I still buy games even if I've a backlog but now I make sure that I know what I want instead of impulse buying which mean I buy far less than I used to.
I like to have a library so that me and my kids have many options to choose from. I love finishing some games and I like just trying out others.

I buy a game when it's A) Something I'd love to try, B) Something that comes in a bundle that comes with something I'd love to try.

Sometimes I even try the games that I don't care about and I end up loving them (Power-Up is a good example of that recently).

With my recent fresh reformat and 64-bit reinstall, I have greatly limited the number of games on my machine, though. I'm trying a new method: Play until I beat or get rid of. I often stop playing a game b/c something else catches my eye, and then it ruins the game that I've been loving. So I'm trying to stop doing that. Now I'll play it until I beat or tire of it, then off it goes and in goes something else. We'll see how that works out for me. My goal is to more fully enjoy the complete story arc of games (I'm so used to playing the beginnings and not the endings now) and to save some money.
avatar
ET3D: The thought is of course always that you'll play them in the future. It's a lie, of course, but it's a convincing lie. I mean, it certainly convinces me to buy more games. (I also have the excuse of "my kids will play it in the future".)
avatar
Nirth: Exactly and even worse, a convincing lie which means people won't stop even when they ought to. Personally I still buy games even if I've a backlog but now I make sure that I know what I want instead of impulse buying which mean I buy far less than I used to.
I try at least to keep track of my purchases and don't let them get too much out of control. This year I spent so far $82 + £18 on games (outside of Kickstarter). I could probably have spent $80 (including £ purchases) less, but I still feel it's not that bad. I've collected more expensive things in the past.
Yes, way too many, I kinda try to convince myself that they will see me through my retirement, so they are an "investment", but that's just BS, I cant resist a really good bargain.
Absolutely. Heck, if I could, I'd give quite a few away to charity (Next Feed the Children AD: "You can help this starving child by donating...a video game). My collection is rather conservative compared to some at:

94 on Steam (that includes things such as expansion packs, and other modes that have their own game link)
44 on GOG

Most of the stuff I will never play I acquired through humblebundles and other bundle deals, and I bought them because I wanted 1 or 2 of the games, and the bundle came with like 7 other ones. There were also a few games I got for free in there.

I do have a few that I'll never play that I bought straight out, but I think this is limited to

Syberia 1+2, Vampire: The Masquerade Bloodlines, and Cthuthlu Saves the World
Yes and no. I'm spending less than in the old days but getting a bit more for it, but this also leads to the never-gonna-play-it backlog. But it isn't causing financial hardship and I don't pick up every new release "just because it's there."