I noticed this bit in the article:
Of course, in the case of Steam, or any of its counterparts, this is a somewhat different situation. Steam isn’t a publisher, it’s a shop. This is the equivalent of being suspected of shoplifting from a GAME/GameStop, and having an employee come to your house and remove your entire gaming collection from your shelves.
With Steam it's more like you buy games and they say "Oh no, we'll keep hold of them for you. Don't worry though, we'll give you a way to get here really quickly from any computer so it's fine!" and you think it's really convenient until the day they suspect you of shoplifting and won't let you into the shop. Only then do you realise that it
really fucking stupid to buy your games from a shop that retains the right to decide whether you can or can't play your games.
------
kavazovangel: No, you don't own the games. And yes, the license can be taken away. GOG can delete your account when they want.
Yes, but GOG deleting your account would simply remove your ability to download the games from them. I don't see how it would revoke the invisible license permanently attached to you.