It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
JudasIscariot: So what would happen if you placed a Paris Hilton into another Paris Hilton??
avatar
Wishbone: You would exceed the critical mass of fail, which would then collapse into a super-singularity and annihilate the universe.

IMPLOSION!!!! :D
avatar
JudasIscariot: So what would happen if you placed a Paris Hilton into another Paris Hilton??
avatar
Wishbone: You would exceed the critical mass of fail, which would then collapse into a super-singularity and annihilate the universe.

Actually, does she fail? I think the most bizarre thing about her is how she enjoys any success at all. It's almost as if people are so obsessed with how useless she is that they keep throwing new opportunities her way just to see if she'll screw it up. Either she's secretly a genius and it's all just an act, or the world is comprised entirely of cataclysmic levels of fail.
Haha, I should bring my sister to the USA!
avatar
Wishbone: You would exceed the critical mass of fail, which would then collapse into a super-singularity and annihilate the universe.
avatar
Navagon: Actually, does she fail? I think the most bizarre thing about her is how she enjoys any success at all. It's almost as if people are so obsessed with how useless she is that they keep throwing new opportunities her way just to see if she'll screw it up. Either she's secretly a genius and it's all just an act, or the world is comprised entirely of cataclysmic levels of fail.

I'm leaning towards option #2...
avatar
Wishbone: You would exceed the critical mass of fail, which would then collapse into a super-singularity and annihilate the universe.
avatar
Navagon: Actually, does she fail? I think the most bizarre thing about her is how she enjoys any success at all. It's almost as if people are so obsessed with how useless she is that they keep throwing new opportunities her way just to see if she'll screw it up. Either she's secretly a genius and it's all just an act, or the world is comprised entirely of cataclysmic levels of fail.

Could be a bit of both?? She's like the Mr.Magoo of fail ...never sees it coming and miraculously she avoids it ..
avatar
Navagon: Actually, does she fail? I think the most bizarre thing about her is how she enjoys any success at all. It's almost as if people are so obsessed with how useless she is that they keep throwing new opportunities her way just to see if she'll screw it up. Either she's secretly a genius and it's all just an act, or the world is comprised entirely of cataclysmic levels of fail.
avatar
Wishbone: I'm leaning towards option #2...

Me too. If only because the idea of her being intelligent makes my head hurt.
avatar
Navagon: Actually, does she fail? I think the most bizarre thing about her is how she enjoys any success at all. It's almost as if people are so obsessed with how useless she is that they keep throwing new opportunities her way just to see if she'll screw it up. Either she's secretly a genius and it's all just an act, or the world is comprised entirely of cataclysmic levels of fail.
avatar
JudasIscariot: Could be a bit of both?? She's like the Mr.Magoo of fail ...never sees it coming and miraculously she avoids it ..

It might simply be that she fails so utterly that it goes full circle and becomes success. She has the inherent ability to pull a Homer.
Post edited July 28, 2009 by Navagon
It could be a subclassification of clarke's law, "any sufficiently advanced form of vulgar vapid brainless train wreck stupidity is indistinguishable from self promotional genius"
To veer suddenly and erratically back to the topic like a drunk driver, there's more news on the Inferno PR debacle, this time in the form of some Gay Pwnage. Suppose that answers my earlier question about support for gay gamers even if the gentleman in question is slightly suspicious of it.
avatar
chautemoc: EA has clarified the situation.

An interesting comment from Kotaku's coverage of that story: "This was also illustrated by a tramp-stamp logo atop some kind of crack, be it butt or boobs."
Apparently Kotaku's writers either don't see very well, or know very little of human anatomy. At least, I've never seen a butt with collarbones right above it.
avatar
chautemoc: EA has clarified the situation.
avatar
Wishbone: An interesting comment from Kotaku's coverage of that story: "This was also illustrated by a tramp-stamp logo atop some kind of crack, be it butt or boobs."
Apparently Kotaku's writers either don't see very well, or know very little of human anatomy. At least, I've never seen a butt with collarbones right above it.

That's not what that is. It's any tattoo.
avatar
Wishbone: Apparently Kotaku's writers either don't see very well, or know very little of human anatomy. At least, I've never seen a butt with collarbones right above it.
avatar
chautemoc: That's not what that is. It's any tattoo.

What?
avatar
chautemoc: That's not what that is. It's any tattoo.
avatar
Wishbone: What?

What.
Eh?
avatar
Wishbone: What?
avatar
chautemoc: What.

What you said made absolutely no sense in the context it was said in. I have no idea what you mean.
I thought it was baically "tattoo != tramp stamp"
avatar
chautemoc: What.
avatar
Wishbone: What you said made absolutely no sense in the context it was said in. I have no idea what you mean.

I think he equated a tattoo being placed on ANY section of a woman's body with a tramp stamp...