It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Emualynk: http://indiegamesfortheplayers.blogspot.fr/2012/04/mario-kart-64.html

This article is hilarious, he didn't even change the name of your blog in it.
Not only is he a thief, but a damn stupid one.
avatar
Emualynk: http://indiegamesfortheplayers.blogspot.fr/2012/04/mario-kart-64.html

This article is hilarious, he didn't even change the name of your blog in it.
avatar
lowyhong: Not only is he a thief, but a damn stupid one.
This is absolutely hilarious! Yeah, he's totally going to get away with this.
He might be just a kid who doesn't know better - I suggest to calmly explain to him that copyright doesn't work like he thinks it does, so that he might learn something. Don't spend more than 5 minutes on it though, since (according to his behavior so far) there's a good chance that any explanations will fall on deaf ears. And yes, I'd definitely report him.

If someone copied an article from me, and was genuinely interested in the content, then I would suggest working something out instead. Cooperations between bloggers are impoprtant to gain visibility. However, in the case you're experiencing, the sad fact is that he doesn't seem to have anything to offer, and his immature behavior makes him a bad candidate for any form of cooperation anyway.
avatar
Psyringe: He might be just a kid who doesn't know better - I suggest to calmly explain to him that copyright doesn't work like he thinks it does, so that he might learn something. Don't spend more than 5 minutes on it though, since (according to his behavior so far) there's a good chance that any explanations will fall on deaf ears. And yes, I'd definitely report him.

If someone copied an article from me, and was genuinely interested in the content, then I would suggest working something out instead. Cooperations between bloggers are impoprtant to gain visibility. However, in the case you're experiencing, the sad fact is that he doesn't seem to have anything to offer, and his immature behavior makes him a bad candidate for any form of cooperation anyway.
So true, thank you. I'll send him a message via comment on his latest stolen article. Should I tell him that it is against the law and his site could be taken down as well as Google IP banning him from particular services?
avatar
xXShaddowTXx: So true, thank you. I'll send him a message via comment on his latest stolen article. Should I tell him that it is against the law and his site could be taken down as well as Google IP banning him from particular services?
I think the most important thing he needs to understand is that every piece of work is automatically copyrighted by the author, and that copying something and adding a "coypright by me" note doesn't grant him copyright, but is a violation of the law he's trying to exploit instead. I don't know much about the IP banning stuff, and the "threat level" of mentioning it might be too high, but you're already giving it too much thought imho. ;)
avatar
xXShaddowTXx: So true, thank you. I'll send him a message via comment on his latest stolen article. Should I tell him that it is against the law and his site could be taken down as well as Google IP banning him from particular services?
avatar
Psyringe: I think the most important thing he needs to understand is that every piece of work is automatically copyrighted by the author, and that copying something and adding a "coypright by me" note doesn't grant him copyright, but is a violation of the law he's trying to exploit instead. I don't know much about the IP banning stuff, and the "threat level" of mentioning it might be too high, but you're already giving it too much thought imho. ;)
Lol, yeah. I filed a separate claim for each of the stolen articles and I linked him to a page that explains all of that.

I hope he takes it down.. he's certainly stopped posting them since I made that comment.
I link to Wikipedia when I can't be bothered explaining things.
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I link to Wikipedia when I can't be bothered explaining things.
LOL Yeah, I considered that. This just seemed to get to the point a tad bit quicker.
avatar
xXShaddowTXx: If you do not remove this content within 72 hours I will be forced to report this site to Blogspot to be reviewed for closure."
Threats like that rarely work. You should always try the polite, "please remove my content and ask for permission next time" approach first.
About three minutes ago, he replied to a comment, reiterating that stuff isn't copyrighted unless you file paperwork. Now he's removed all the comments. What a dipshit.
Post edited April 17, 2012 by Drat
avatar
Drat: About three minutes ago, he replied to a comment, reiterating that stuff isn't copyrighted unless you file paperwork. Now he's removed all the comments. What a dipshit.
I think he doesn't understand that copyright isn't patents.
avatar
Drat: About three minutes ago, he replied to a comment, reiterating that stuff isn't copyrighted unless you file paperwork. Now he's removed all the comments. What a dipshit.
this blog is turning into pure comedy gold! The other readers from the various ripped off blogs are finding it and starting to post soon he'll be spending all his time deleting posts!

::edit to add:: lol and his dark sector post is a BAD copy paste job it cuts off mid paragraph!
Post edited April 17, 2012 by wodmarach
The nerve (and stupidity) of some people.. When I saw the copyright I LMAO!!
Post edited April 17, 2012 by MrAlphaNumeric
Hahaha!
He's so stupid he's admitted stealing stuff on his blog

http://indiegamesfortheplayers.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/la-de-da-de-dah-de-dah.html
avatar
Matchstickman: Hahaha!
He's so stupid he's admitted stealing stuff on his blog

http://indiegamesfortheplayers.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/la-de-da-de-dah-de-dah.html
Isn't he saying he's on GOG..?

Gentlemen, we have been infiltrated. Abort! Abort!