It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
hedwards: Better yet ask for them to put a public statement on their website about it if possible.
avatar
orcishgamer: Has anyone actually made such a statement? If so, I might just think a lot more of said publisher.
Not that I know of, however I too would be significantly more likely to buy games from such a company. Most of the time they just turn a blind eye to it which makes it a bit risky for those wanting to post those videos as they're not really sure whether the publisher is going to try and have them taken down.
avatar
hedwards: Better yet ask for them to put a public statement on their website about it if possible.
avatar
orcishgamer: Has anyone actually made such a statement? If so, I might just think a lot more of said publisher.
Nintendo's European branch openly encouraged people to make Let's Play videos of Xenoblade. They even made a contest out of it.
avatar
Fred_DM: so, do publishers actually request the removal of gameplay videos on YouTube? there are thousands of Let's Play clips online, and apparently nobody gives a crap. this would be a problem with SOPA, but not now.

the only times i remember publishers demanding the removal of game-related videos were when officially unreleased footage was involved.
Companies request the removal of their own ads sometimes when they're posted to YouTube, so it wouldn't surprise me if some of those videos were removed.

And they can use the DMCA as most folks don't know their rights and enforcing them can get expensive with all the attorneys involved.
There are a few things to bear in mind

1: DRM-free has no bearing one way or the other on whether something is protected by copyright. LBA and LBA2 most certainly are under copyright.

2: A gameplay video could arguably be fair use or public performance. That's why it's complicated - it mostly depends on who's better at arguing.

The worst that's likely to happen is the video being deleted, so it doesn't seem like too much of a risk.
Post edited January 20, 2012 by Barefoot_Monkey
Another good example of how the US Fair Use laws need to be modernized. At least make it clear one way or the other.. no more ambiguity.

To me, this would be Fair Use, but as has been stated "it's complicated".
Thanks everyone for the attention! =)
ADM, you can close this topic now
avatar
lestatgss: Thanks everyone for the attention! =)
ADM, you can close this topic now
Mark it as "solved" by picking a solution post.