It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Aliasalpha: Dragging it back to the game angle, am I the only one who'd love a close support chopper sim where you have to face choices like this? Stuff where its not just locating and shooting bad guys but where you have to actually act with greater care to avoid civilian casualties?

It's called COD 4.
Wait a minute.
avatar
Arkose: Accidents like this happen in every war, it's just that they don't always become public knowledge.

This is maybe a very important point. Do you remember Video in wich an American soldier in Iraq killed an enemy lying on the ground wounded?
The trouble is not american, russian, arabians, etc. The trouble is war. War never changes as a great game says to us. In war you have to shot before you enemy. Everything could be a danger for your life. This is the point of view of every soldier. There is not a way to build rules in a situation of war.
This is the reason I don't accept every war, it's not important who is fighting for what.
My two cents
avatar
stonebro: Other than the special forces, we don't really need a large standing army as we are not aggressionist dickwads.
avatar
Catshade: stonebro
Fearsome Viking

Too perfect.
avatar
stonebro: Norway has the best special forces in the world, with the possible exception of Israel.

Well, you know, I actually put in one of my posts that I was NOT comparing special forces. I was comparing basic enlisted troops, in terms of training. In terms of equipment, I was counting anything and everything that helps them do their job (e.g. satellites, UAVs, and other such technology).
As for special forces, I would put up the U.S. Delta Force boys against anything any other country has to offer. That goes double for operations in enclosed areas like office buildings and planes. However, since they exist outside the normal U.S. Military chain of command, whether they should be included for comparison is debatable.
avatar
stonebro: Norway has the best special forces in the world, with the possible exception of Israel.
avatar
Krypsyn: Well, you know, I actually put in one of my posts that I was NOT comparing special forces. I was comparing basic enlisted troops, in terms of training. In terms of equipment, I was counting anything and everything that helps them do their job (e.g. satellites, UAVs, and other such technology).
As for special forces, I would put up the U.S. Delta Force boys against anything any other country has to offer. That goes double for operations in enclosed areas like office buildings and planes. However, since they exist outside the normal U.S. Military chain of command, whether they should be included for comparison is debatable.

I bet you regret that best in the world remark.
avatar
Salsa_Shark: I bet you regret that best in the world remark.

Hehe, I already said it was ill advised of me to post that remark.
I still think my Daddy can beat up your Daddy though! ;)
avatar
stonebro: Norway has the best special forces in the world, with the possible exception of Israel.
avatar
Krypsyn: Well, you know, I actually put in one of my posts that I was NOT comparing special forces. I was comparing basic enlisted troops, in terms of training. In terms of equipment, I was counting anything and everything that helps them do their job (e.g. satellites, UAVs, and other such technology).
As for special forces, I would put up the U.S. Delta Force boys against anything any other country has to offer. That goes double for operations in enclosed areas like office buildings and planes. However, since they exist outside the normal U.S. Military chain of command, whether they should be included for comparison is debatable.

Hard to say. I'd have to say British SAS, as well as a few other European units (German, Dutch, etc) have a bit more discipline, and I'd assume Israeli SF are pretty hardcore what with their having to be trained in an extremely hostile environment with training from some of the top nations special forces.
I've heard personal accounts from the Russian Spetznaz still being insanely good, but I don't know how accurate that is what with some of the absolute failures in anti-terrorism ops conducted there.
Honestly, I think we are overlooking the personal aspect of this. The chopper pilot was protecting his buddies on the ground, there is a DAMN close bond formed in the military and when it is your job to watch backs, you bet your gonna get excited about watching backs. And the whole van thing, I may of made the same decision given the circumstances.
No body is mentioning that simply using a pair of binoculars would have prevented this. I bet they are standard issue on helicopters. I think they just wanted to shoot.
In another line of musing; reports like this have been streaming in since the begging of the war, I wonder why this caught such attention.
avatar
Cor: No body is mentioning that simply using a pair of binoculars would have prevented this. I bet they are standard issue on helicopters. I think they just wanted to shoot.
In another line of musing; reports like this have been streaming in since the begging of the war, I wonder why this caught such attention.

Why would binoculars be issued to helo pilots? Their hands are JUST a little busy, what with keeping the bird in the air...
avatar
Crassmaster: Why would binoculars be issued to helo pilots? Their hands are JUST a little busy, what with keeping the bird in the air...

Apaches are manned by two people, the pilot and a co-pilot/gunner. However, binoculars would probably be rather redundant, as Apaches are also equipped with a high-resolution camera that feeds the images to the gunner. Remember that in this instance the helicopter was firing from over a kilometer away, and you don't hit things at that range unless you have the means to get a good look at just where you're aiming.
avatar
Wraith: Hard to say. I'd have to say British SAS, as well as a few other European units (German, Dutch, etc) have a bit more discipline, and I'd assume Israeli SF are pretty hardcore what with their having to be trained in an extremely hostile environment with training from some of the top nations special forces.
I've heard personal accounts from the Russian Spetznaz still being insanely good, but I don't know how accurate that is what with some of the absolute failures in anti-terrorism ops conducted there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinejegerkommandoen
"MJK is believed to have been the only unit among the other Coalition special forces which has not been airlifted out of areas due to dehydration and/or altitude sickness in the extreme conditions in Afghanistan. MJK is also the unit with the highest number of operations among the other special operation forces of the Coalition in the area (2001-2005)."
avatar
Crassmaster: Why would binoculars be issued to helo pilots? Their hands are JUST a little busy, what with keeping the bird in the air...
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Apaches are manned by two people, the pilot and a co-pilot/gunner. However, binoculars would probably be rather redundant, as Apaches are also equipped with a high-resolution camera that feeds the images to the gunner. Remember that in this instance the helicopter was firing from over a kilometer away, and you don't hit things at that range unless you have the means to get a good look at just where you're aiming.

Quite true. And if you're flying around in a helicopter, you're going to be better off looking at your view screens than trying to jam a pair of binoculars up to your face and look through those.
avatar
Wraith: Hard to say. I'd have to say British SAS, as well as a few other European units (German, Dutch, etc) have a bit more discipline, and I'd assume Israeli SF are pretty hardcore what with their having to be trained in an extremely hostile environment with training from some of the top nations special forces.
I've heard personal accounts from the Russian Spetznaz still being insanely good, but I don't know how accurate that is what with some of the absolute failures in anti-terrorism ops conducted there.
avatar
stonebro: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinejegerkommandoen
"MJK is believed to have been the only unit among the other Coalition special forces which has not been airlifted out of areas due to dehydration and/or altitude sickness in the extreme conditions in Afghanistan. MJK is also the unit with the highest number of operations among the other special operation forces of the Coalition in the area (2001-2005)."

It would help if that article had some statistics to back it up. I can't help but take it with a grain of salt since it's on Wikipedia and there are absolutely no citations on it.
avatar
Wraith: It would help if that article had some statistics to back it up. I can't help but take it with a grain of salt since it's on Wikipedia and there are absolutely no citations on it.

Eh. You don't think such statistics are confidential, what with there being an ongoing conflict and all? All I know is Norway has a disproportionate amount of special forces in action in such theatres compared to the overall size of the army.
They must be held high in regard then for NATO to utilize them more than others.