svmariscal: Slightly related question: I played and immensely enjoyed the original C&C back in the day, and I don't know anything about the other titles in the series. Which one would you say is the closest (gameplay wise etc.) to the original?
ED: typos
Red Alert 1 essentially is a massive expansion pack to the original... or a reskin. Whatever you would call it. Gameplay wise it's superior. I absolutely love both C&C 1 and Red Alert 1 to death, but I think C&C 1 has a slightly cooler setting. Theres more Kane.
Tiberian Sun is fantastic, and the least dated. My personal favorite. However, it does do quite a bit different from the first, and has more of a sci-fi thing going on. Red Alert 2 is basically Tiberian Sun gone Red Alert.
rampancy: Well, the SAGE Engine went on to power LOTR: Battle for Middle-Earth, which got a lot of good reviews (IIRC) so not all of their work was utter crap, right?
Delixe: Battle for Middle Earth was indeed good I really enjoyed it. The sequel was meh because they changed some of the mechanics and set it away from the events of the movies. Fine for Tolkien lovers but no so much for the casual LOTR fans. Command & Conquer 3 and Red Alert 3 are divisive across the community. Some consider them abominations but I've been playing the series since the original before it was called Tiberium Dawn and I loved both of them. Red Alert 3 in particular I thought was fabulous.
Battle for Middle Earth 1 was excellent. I didn't know that C&C devs went on to make that. The campaign in BFME 1 is one of my favorite RTS campaigns of all time. It's the only LOTR game that I actually wanted to be like the movies instead of the books. Because the movies translate well into RTS form.
I'm a huge fan of the LOTR books and I LOVED LOTRO for capturing the feel of them perfectly. But when BFME 2 was supposedly more "true to the books", I call bullcrap. That campaign was utter boring trash. The gameplay improved I felt, but I wasn't buying the game for the online. I want me a good damn campaign.