gooberking: Same.
To test it I inquired about a number of games I had running and known to be working well enough, and they pretty much all turned up as not runable. There may be some disparity between what companies say the minimum requirements for a game are, and what will work, but if the site isn't doing much more than comparing your stats to the official requirements, then I'm not sure it provides any real useful information to someone that knows what all those numbers mean.
Maybe that is the point. It's really just a rough guide for all of the people that don't know what computer stats translate into and can't do the comparison. Most people are probably in that group, so it's probably useful to them. I wish it was based on something a bit more real world that it feels like, but I'm probably a difficult to serve minority, and "runs"is pretty subjective even before you start talking to opinionated know it all's
javier0889: It's not this particular page, it's how vague the "minimum/maximum" concept is. There are many things involved in a game's performance, from hardware to drivers, but when the devs talk about "minimum" requirements, they're probably talking about something like "you need this to be able to start the program", which still doesn't say anything about performance.
Aye, to both. Personally I use the site to gauge whether or not it's worth running even with the so-called minimum requirements. For instance, it tells me I can run Divinity:Original Sin at min but I know just from past experience after reading the comparison of my pc stats and the requirements that I can likely run it at closer to medium.