It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
There's a game I will never create, it's called Zoombie: The Quick and the Dead. It's a racer/shooter taking place in the wild west.

In all likelihood, I'll never even try to make this game, but I kept thinking of a comic style intro to it, and couldn't put it out of my mind. Problem is, I can't draw.

Still, I drew. But to make sure it's a little clearer what's happening on that page, I also wrote it down. You can see both here.

And this is where you, kind gentlemen and ladies, come in. If you can draw and would like to make this comic a little more real, I'd be very grateful.

If you need some incentive, perhaps I could offer a draw (bad pun intended): some game keys on Steam and Desura, perhaps even on GOG. But I'd prefer to see if there's any interest in all this drawing business before I make any concrete offers.

Thank you all in advance.
Drawing, the art of "you see it...now put it to paper" without ever explaining how to accomplish that. ^^
I'm afraid your best hope is to learn how to draw yourself if you have time, but it a LOT of hard work.
Hmm... sounds like it could be fun.

Challenge accepted. Whats my time frame?


EDIT: Uhm.... I mean I'll try my hand at the panel as described. Kicking off a few projects of my own, so I'm not sure I can promise much beyond that, but this does sound like it could be fun!
Post edited January 20, 2014 by Daggerknight
avatar
ET3D: There's a game I will never create, it's called Zoombie: The Quick and the Dead. It's a racer/shooter taking place in the wild west.

In all likelihood, I'll never even try to make this game, but I kept thinking of a comic style intro to it, and couldn't put it out of my mind. Problem is, I can't draw.

Still, I drew. But to make sure it's a little clearer what's happening on that page, I also wrote it down. You can see both here.

And this is where you, kind gentlemen and ladies, come in. If you can draw and would like to make this comic a little more real, I'd be very grateful.

If you need some incentive, perhaps I could offer a draw (bad pun intended): some game keys on Steam and Desura, perhaps even on GOG. But I'd prefer to see if there's any interest in all this drawing business before I make any concrete offers.

Thank you all in advance.
You should learn, it's not really that tough and it's quite rewarding. Comic style is generally fairly tough,unless you're going for something banal like a lot of the Anime style stuff you see.

The first two are commercial, but very reasonably priced, and the last two are completely free. Most of the people who say that they can't draw were never shown the basics. The basics aren't that tough to grasp, and it tends to build with practice.

https://www.udemy.com/learn-to-draw-and-paint/?sl=E0IacFlVQxMALBoeCRAcKBM%3D
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0929261518/qid=1146780749/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&v=glance&n=283155#reader_0929261518
http://johnkdesign.blogspot.com/
http://johnkcurriculum.blogspot.com/
I couldn't draw to save my life or anyone elses. lol
Yes I can.
Attachments:
picture.jpg (57 Kb)
avatar
monkeydelarge: Yes I can.
Win. lol
avatar
hedwards: Most of the people who say that they can't draw were never shown the basics. The basics aren't that tough to grasp
And have spent years trying to find and learn them* if you want to be specific. Everyone points to the same crap like Betty Edwards and Bert Dodson instead of any real basic resources. I have yet to find a paid resource that actually does what it/everyone claims, let alone websites doing it pro bono.

For example, on the udemy he follows the same line of thinking most 'art teachers' (who aren't actually teachers, just artists attempting to teach) that if you draw everything and add commentary about it, that that substitutes an actual explanation/demonstration. "I can draw it and talk about it" is not teaching, it's showing off. An artist sees it and says "this stuff is basic. well done!" while a student sees it and wonders "how am I supposed to do that?"

Here's the actual problem in case you missed it: the teacher did not take the student through the stages of art development, but rather through general topics expecting them to be developed enough. And this is the flaw with the thinking of artists, and why I greatly dislike Betty Edwards. She actually covers it ( http://www.learningdesign.com/Portfolio/DrawDev/kiddrawing.html ) but fails to take you through it in her works.

tldr: Don't pay to learn art unless you're getting tutored in person by someone you can beat up if they go off on tangents. Also, if you find some good free resources hit me up. :D
No .
avatar
hedwards: Most of the people who say that they can't draw were never shown the basics. The basics aren't that tough to grasp
avatar
MaximumBunny: And have spent years trying to find and learn them* if you want to be specific. Everyone points to the same crap like Betty Edwards and Bert Dodson instead of any real basic resources. I have yet to find a paid resource that actually does what it/everyone claims, let alone websites doing it pro bono.

For example, on the udemy he follows the same line of thinking most 'art teachers' (who aren't actually teachers, just artists attempting to teach) that if you draw everything and add commentary about it, that that substitutes an actual explanation/demonstration. "I can draw it and talk about it" is not teaching, it's showing off. An artist sees it and says "this stuff is basic. well done!" while a student sees it and wonders "how am I supposed to do that?"

Here's the actual problem in case you missed it: the teacher did not take the student through the stages of art development, but rather through general topics expecting them to be developed enough. And this is the flaw with the thinking of artists, and why I greatly dislike Betty Edwards. She actually covers it ( http://www.learningdesign.com/Portfolio/DrawDev/kiddrawing.html ) but fails to take you through it in her works.

tldr: Don't pay to learn art unless you're getting tutored in person by someone you can beat up if they go off on tangents. Also, if you find some good free resources hit me up. :D
I don't agree with this at all. I made the mistake when I was younger at cheaping out on things and usually it doesn't work out very well. Ed Emberley has a brilliant set of books for beginners. They're all 2d art without any shading or perspective, and virtually anybody can draw that.

From there I'd move onto that course on painting.

Art is a bit like foreign language learning, there's tons of people out there making excuses as to why it didn't work for them, but most of the time it's their own damned fault.

EDIT: Sounds to me like your the problem here,not the instructor. He goes through it in a reasonable sequence and if you do the work, you get the results. There's no way that a teacher can overcome a students bizarre beliefs.
Post edited January 20, 2014 by hedwards
avatar
hedwards: I don't agree with this at all. I made the mistake when I was younger at cheaping out on things and usually it doesn't work out very well. Ed Emberley has a brilliant set of books for beginners. They're all 2d art without any shading or perspective, and virtually anybody can draw that.

From there I'd move onto that course on painting.

Art is a bit like foreign language learning, there's tons of people out there making excuses as to why it didn't work for them, but most of the time it's their own damned fault.

EDIT: Sounds to me like your the problem here,not the instructor. He goes through it in a reasonable sequence and if you do the work, you get the results. There's no way that a teacher can overcome a students bizarre beliefs.
Yes, it's all my fault. You're right. I should just go and kill myself or something. My opinions and experiences are completely worthless. Thanks.
avatar
hedwards: I don't agree with this at all. I made the mistake when I was younger at cheaping out on things and usually it doesn't work out very well. Ed Emberley has a brilliant set of books for beginners. They're all 2d art without any shading or perspective, and virtually anybody can draw that.

From there I'd move onto that course on painting.

Art is a bit like foreign language learning, there's tons of people out there making excuses as to why it didn't work for them, but most of the time it's their own damned fault.

EDIT: Sounds to me like your the problem here,not the instructor. He goes through it in a reasonable sequence and if you do the work, you get the results. There's no way that a teacher can overcome a students bizarre beliefs.
avatar
MaximumBunny: Yes, it's all my fault. You're right. I should just go and kill myself or something. My opinions and experiences are completely worthless. Thanks.
Nice trolling there.

The fact is that the methods work for a lot of students. And nobody would ever manage to complete art school if they were as bad as you seem to think. Students who look at the examples as if they are unattainably good are clearly not listening to what the instructor is saying. Or they've got a shitty instructor that isn't adequately explaining what the point they're illustrating is.

And yes, your whole post is dripping with venom which leads me to suspect that you're not actually making use of the instruction available.

Art is art, while there is a fair amount of leeway as to what exactly good art is, the rules necessary to create decent pictures are hardly as complicated or unattainable as you seem to believe. This sounds more like a mental problem than one of pedagogy.
avatar
hedwards: Nice trolling there.

The fact is that the methods work for a lot of students. And nobody would ever manage to complete art school if they were as bad as you seem to think. Students who look at the examples as if they are unattainably good are clearly not listening to what the instructor is saying. Or they've got a shitty instructor that isn't adequately explaining what the point they're illustrating is.

And yes, your whole post is dripping with venom which leads me to suspect that you're not actually making use of the instruction available.

Art is art, while there is a fair amount of leeway as to what exactly good art is, the rules necessary to create decent pictures are hardly as complicated or unattainable as you seem to believe. This sounds more like a mental problem than one of pedagogy.
The point of my last post was that you were ignoring the fact that everyone is not at the same place, and you're simply villainizing me to maintain your worldview of art. I could argue with you about that, or I could just say you win to make you happy because you're not content in understanding how something could be different than what you've come to accept.

And you're welcomed to continue hurling insults rather than help, because that's what I've come to expect from 'artists'. Nothing in my post was offensive, yet you decided to tell me that I'm the problem, the system is fine, and that everything I said should be ignored by everyone.

I'm replying to you not because I want to argue with you, which I'd like to see an end to, but because I don't like your portrayal of my several years of going through hundreds of resources and communities with no success. Paid resources, free resources, all the same. I'm obviously doing things wrong, and the solution for me would also be beneficial to everyone beginning art. Though if you'd like to promote "learn perspective, then learn shading, then learn this, then that" that's good for you who have developed enough skills prior from scribbling on walls to learn the classic route. But like language and music, it's still something that you develop and you need to start at the beginning.
avatar
hedwards: Nice trolling there.

The fact is that the methods work for a lot of students. And nobody would ever manage to complete art school if they were as bad as you seem to think. Students who look at the examples as if they are unattainably good are clearly not listening to what the instructor is saying. Or they've got a shitty instructor that isn't adequately explaining what the point they're illustrating is.

And yes, your whole post is dripping with venom which leads me to suspect that you're not actually making use of the instruction available.

Art is art, while there is a fair amount of leeway as to what exactly good art is, the rules necessary to create decent pictures are hardly as complicated or unattainable as you seem to believe. This sounds more like a mental problem than one of pedagogy.
avatar
MaximumBunny: The point of my last post was that you were ignoring the fact that everyone is not at the same place, and you're simply villainizing me to maintain your worldview of art. I could argue with you about that, or I could just say you win to make you happy because you're not content in understanding how something could be different than what you've come to accept.

And you're welcomed to continue hurling insults rather than help, because that's what I've come to expect from 'artists'. Nothing in my post was offensive, yet you decided to tell me that I'm the problem, the system is fine, and that everything I said should be ignored by everyone.

I'm replying to you not because I want to argue with you, which I'd like to see an end to, but because I don't like your portrayal of my several years of going through hundreds of resources and communities with no success. Paid resources, free resources, all the same. I'm obviously doing things wrong, and the solution for me would also be beneficial to everyone beginning art. Though if you'd like to promote "learn perspective, then learn shading, then learn this, then that" that's good for you who have developed enough skills prior from scribbling on walls to learn the classic route. But like language and music, it's still something that you develop and you need to start at the beginning.
Oh please don't give me that crap. Nothing in any of your posts here has been constructive.

It's shitty advice to tell people not to pay money for art lessons unless you can physically intimidate the instructor. There's tons of good resources and classes out there. Some of them are free and some of them cost money. Nothing, I suggested is likely to break ones budget.

What's more I wasn't born a natural artist. I spent years working on various art forms and putting a ton of effort into it. The attitude that you're taking about how nobody should go through the steps is just bullshit advice. The steps that are involved with a classical education in drawing or painting are the way they are because they're by and large necessary. Yes, some of the steps that the masters had to go through were that way because it was a more efficient use of resources to make people apprentice so that the master didn't have to stretch the canvasses etc, but these days most of those things are done by machines or by non-artists anyways.

If you don't understand why art classes are taught in the way that they're taught, then you shouldn't be commenting in such a categorical way about how stupid it is. My only regret with my art education is that I didn't get enough of the classical approach as most of what's held me back over the years was adequate exercises and fundamentals.

I realize that it doesn't work for everybody, but realistically if things were as dire as you're suggesting, art colleges would have gone out of business decades ago and realistically probably wouldn't have been created in the first place.

In any endeavor, there's effort that the student has to make in order to understand the utility of the techniques and integrate that knowledge. An instructor can show the techniques and lead by example, but the student ultimately has to draw some of the connections themselves and learn to analyze other examples.

Back to the advice I had for the OP, if you want to learn to draw, it's almost certainly well within your grasp. Assuming that you're interested enough to put in the effort. Most people can draw, even if they never attain the level necessary to make a living by drawing. There's no reason why most people can't draw simple cartoons or pictures.