XD!

If Activision only could get a third team so the development-cycle would be on three years

...

Or God forbid, they make a decent game-engine that is not made from quake 2's engine. (I've heard of a good one called frostbite 2, although there is no good game made on that either)

Ditto.

They are going to milk that cow for all it's worth

going to get flamed for this but CoD is one of the worst things to happen to gaming(the first two where fantastic).

That is why they dropped the "Call of Duty" out of the title.

The game will be called Modern Warfare 4

I don't agree they are the worst but they aren't my favourite either but I agree about the first Call of Duty, it's a great game. I hope it and United Offensive arrive here some day.

And off topic again. You might be interested in this:

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=105589650&searchtext=

Actually I like the first and Modern Warfare.

They are operating on the same engine for ages, they could probably pop 2 COD games a year, if they wanted ;P

btw. I jump on "first 4 COD games were good" wagon. ;-)

That's the possible explanation, because I have never tried to become teh 1337 g4m3z0r. :P

According to my trusted (re: Wikipedia, lol) source, it's based on iDTech 3, the same engine used for Quake 3, a game released in 1999.
Holy shit are they milking that engine for all it's worth :/

2 and a half D Doom clone FPS :)
Only good thing the new CODs offered were Nazi Zombies in which now EVERY PC FPS features a Mod of it.

Man and despite the fact that the later CODs after 4 has pretty much the same multiplayer I rather play Call of Duty 4's its just more simpler.

You don't have too many weapon attachments just 2 sights, a grenade launcher, grip, and suppressor.

And not that many Killstreaks just UAV,Supply Drop, Air Streak, Helicopter.

And I like the weapon list

http://thetkclanxxx.webs.com/photos/CoD-screen-shots/Weapons_of_CoD_MW[1].jpg

and maps were better like Crash.